Jun 23, 2017

Eatables should not be packed in newspapers, plastic bags: Collector

Virudhunagar Collector A. Sivagnanam has warned hoteliers and tea stalls against packing eatables in newspapers and hot beverages in plastic bags.
In a statement, he said hotels, tea stalls and bakeries had the habit of packing eatables in newspapers. The ink used for printing on newspapers have chemicals, including lead and cadium, which could get mixed with the packed eatables. The chemicals on being consumed could lead to indigestion and cancer, and also affect liver and the brain.
Similarly, serving hot eatables on plastic papers or packing hot beverages in plastic covers will lead to melting of the plastic, leading to cancer and affecting the liver.
People can lodge food-related complaints through WhatsApp number 94440-42322.
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India has banned packing of eatables and beverages in newspapers and plastic covers.
Hoteliers and bakeries could use plantain leaves, arecanut leaf sheath, paper plates and cups made of leaves for packing eatables.
Mr. Sivagnanam said that tea, milk, sambar and rasam should not be packed in plastic covers. Stringent action would be taken against those who violate the food safety rules under the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006.
Hoteliers can apply for food safety licence through the websitewww.fssai.gov.in. This could be done through e-service centres, Mr. Sivagnanam said.

Register your food business with food safety officials: Collector

District Collector T.N. Hariharan has asked those in food business to register with the food safety office concerned or obtain licence. A release issued by the district administration said that those who cook food, wholesale traders, distributors, retail traders, bakeries, cool drink manufacturers and sellers, ice cream parlours, sweet shops, snack bars, grocers, rice mills, spices producers, food re-packers, milk producers, processing units and sellers and those who use vehicles to transport food and everybody in the food business chain should register with the authority as per the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2011.
Those who run canteen, mess in government establishments, hostels, street vendors, push cart vendors, caterers who undertake party, wedding or other orders, meat, poultry, pork stalls and noon meal centres should also obtain licence.
Those who had already registered or licensed should renew their registration or licence before expiry. The Coimbatore office of the Designated Food Safety Officer had issued licence to 5,722 persons and issued registration certificate to 9,521 persons.
It had initiated action on 204 persons on food adulteration charges and collected Rs. 16.60 lakh in fine, the release added.
The release also asked people to report complaints through WhatsApp on 94440-42322.

Many districts yet to comply with food safety rules

Madurai: In an age when most people are utmost vigilant about the food they eat, its safety has assumed paramount importance. However, an RTI filed by a law student has picked several holes in the imposition of food safety act including low fines due to lack of sensitisation among the officials. The RTI also revealed that many districts in the state were yet to constitute district-level steering committees which are mandatory under the act on food safety.
R S Aafreen, a second year student of law, said that district revenue officers were designated as adjudicating officer under the FSSA with powers of a civil court for imposing penalties other than jail. Due to lack of sensitisation, the fine that has been imposed in many cases ranged from Rs 500 to Rs 5,000 though the act stipulates imposing fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment of up to six months
Aafreen had filed the RTI seeking the status of district-level steering committees in the 32 districts. The Tamil Nadu government order G.O (D) No 923 dated September 12, 2014 had directed officials to constitute food steering committees at the state as well as the district level under the Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006. District level food safety steering committees have to be constituted with the district collector as chairperson to monitor the food industry.
The RTI which was addressed to the state commissionerate got the district level officers to answer it but only 15 of the 32 officers have answered the query indicating the absence of the committees. As per the reply to the RTI, Dindigul, Madurai, Ramanathapuram, Salem and Virudhunagar districts did not furnish any reply to the formation of the steering committees.
The state had integrated the food safety wing of the directorate of public health and the department of drugs control administration and formed the Tamil Nadu Food Safety and Drug Administration under FSSA and Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011. The food safety commissionerate of Tamil Nadu is one of the biggest departments in the country with 32 district designated officers, 580 food safety officers and supportive staff. However, the commissioner of food safety continues to hold multiple responsibilities.
It is specified that the district designated officer should have a medical degree and that the food safety officer (FSO) a degree in chemistry and allied subjects. Persons who are appointed as FSOs cannot be promoted to the next level of district designated officer as it needs a medical degree. This leads to a lack of motivation among them.
The annual report of 2013-2014 of the department says that the 580 FSOs had collected only 658 legal samples and that cases were filed against only 61 traders and the total penalty imposed during the entire year was only Rs 5.7 lakhs while the food commissionerate gets over Rs 50 crore annually for its functioning. The annual report says that Rs 35 lakh was collected as penalty in 203 cases in the year 2014-2015.

Food safety inspections continue

The Food Safety Department continued its Statewide inspections of shops on Thursday to ensure food safety and allay people’s concerns in the wake of social media speculations about the sale of food products such as rice and sugar laced with plastic.
Over the week, 677 centres were inspected and 136 of them were served notices for renovation and other issues. A fine of Rs. 1.8 lakh was imposed. A total of 436 samples of rice and sugar have been taken for examination. The test results of the samples would be available in two weeks, an official statement said.

27 food outlets asked to shut shop

Vadodara: Food safety officers of the Vadodara Municipal Corporation continued their crackdown upon eateries operating without registrations mandatory under the Food Safety and Standards Act. On Thursday, officers checked 48 shops, seven handcarts and 29 restaurants or eateries in different parts. It came to light that 27 establishments including 17 shops, four handcarts and six restaurants or eateries did not have registrations. The eateries include a prominent restaurant on the Old Padra Road, an Indian fast food chain outlet and prominent 'pan' shops.

FSSAI committed to robust and unambiguous standards for food supplements

Pawan Kumar Agarwal, Chief Executive Officer of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) said Thursday that the FSSAI is committed to ensuring robust and unambiguous standards for food supplements with the help of industry.
Addressing a FICCI seminar on Nutraceuticals - Seizing Growth Opportunities under Changing Economic and Regulatory Landscape held here today, Agarwal urged food processing industry players to work with the FSSAI on developing good manufacturing practices, document and adoption of it for overcoming challenges of spurious and dubious products flooding Indian markets.
Agarwal also mentioned that FSSAI is working with the central drug regulator to make a clear distinction between drug and food, which will clear a lot of ambiguity present among the stakeholders.
The other speakers in the inaugural session included Dr. B. Sesikeran, Chairman, Scientific Panel on Functional Foods, Nutraceuticals, Dietetic products and other similar products, FSSAI, Dr. A K Sharma, Consultant, FSSAI; Mr. Sanjaya Mariwala, Chairman, FICCI Task Force on Nutraceuticals and Managing Director and CEO, OmniActive Health Technologies Ltd; Mr. Sandeep Ahuja, Chairman, FICCI ? Wellness Committee and Executive Director, VLCC Healthcare Ltd and Dr. A Didar Singh, Secretary General, FICCI.
Dr. A Didar Singh emphasized the need for having standards for food products and how FICCI can collaboratively work with FSSAI to further expand the scope of standards beyond the current standards.
Sanjaya Mariwala highlighted the growth opportunities in Nutraceuticals and its contribution to Make in India initiative. He also invite industry member to work collaboratively on matters related to GST.
The seminar was attended by about 100 participants from the nutraceuticals industry.

FSSAI’s move regarding organic food’s certification not wise: CSE

Making organic certification mandatory will only promote the certification industry but not safe food 
Quick Read
FSSAI wants to make certification for foods sold as 'organic' in India mandatory
However, FSSAI's move might result in more Indian farmers giving up organic farming
This could impact food safety in India
Delhi-based non-profit, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has disapproved of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)’s move to make certification of organic food sold in India mandatory. It says that not only will such a move promote just the certification industry but also strike a blow to the organic farming movement in India and impact country's food safety.
On March 31, 2017, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) had issued a notice asking for comments on a proposed regulation titled “Draft Food Safety and Standards (Organic Foods) Regulations, 2017” (Draft Regulations). The regulation seeks to make certification mandatory for any food that claims to be “organic” in the domestic market.
Currently, certification for food sold as “organic” in India is not mandatory. However, there are two prevalent certification systems which are voluntarily followed by those who want to sell food under this category. The first system, which is governed by the Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry, is mandatory for exports. It is called the National Programme for Organic Production and is also referred to as “Third Party Certification”. The second system, governed by the Union Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, is called the Participatory Guarantee System (PGS) and is meant only for the domestic market. The Third Party Certification system is applicable to individual farmers or farmer groups, while the PGS is applicable only to farmer groups and works around the collective responsibility of the group.
The proposed Draft Regulations allow for the direct sale of “fresh organic produce” by producers or producer organisations to the end consumer without it having been certified. However, “processed food” is not exempt from the requirement of certification. This means that for any processed food to be sold as “organic” in Indian markets, it will have to be certified either by an agency under the Third Party Certification system or under PGS.
While both certification systems have a procedure for certification of processed food, practically, as of now, processed food certified under PGS is not a reality. The PGS guidelines allow certification of processed food as organic, only if the entire operation is carried out under the supervision of the PGS group of farmers (or a federation of few groups) and the items being processed are the direct produce of the group (or the groups forming the federation).In simple terms, for PGS-certified processed food, the raw produce must belong to the group of farmers and the processing must be undertaken under their supervision.
Amit Khurana, Senior Programme Manager, Food Safety and Toxins Unit, CSE says, “We understand that most PGS farmers are not undertaking any kind of processing and because they cannot not sell their produce for processing outside the group / federation, they are dealing only in fresh produce.” The sale of fresh organic food in India is already facing many challenges because of a lack of market linkages. As a result, farmers do not get the premium price they deserve for organic food and they are suffering, he adds.
Khurana said that the draft regulations could spell a lot of trouble if they became law, “If that happens, it will further eliminate any sale of PGS produce for processing outside the group and PGS farmers will be left with very limited options.”
One option could be to convert to the expensive system of Third Party Certification. But that too would be a futile move since it would only lead to the industry of certification agencies being promoted. Farmers who are unable to afford third party certification, might continue selling fresh produce despite the discouraging market situation, or worse, may quit organic farming. This adverse impact on the organic farming movement will lead to more food grown with the use of pesticides and other chemicals and will impact food safety in India.

Food safety authority’s draft amendments include fatty acids composition in edible oil

NEW DELHI, JUNE 22: 
In a bid to curb misleading claims and adulteration in edible oils, the Food Safety and Standards Authority (FSSAI) has notified a draft regulation that sets standards for the permissible composition of fatty acids in various types of edible oils.
The amendments in the regulation have been introduced at a time when edible oil companies have been increasingly looking at launching blended oil products to woo consumers with various health benefit claims.
The food regulator said the draft FSS (Food Product Standards and Food Additives) Amendment Regulation 2017 will pave the way for determination of the authenticity of edible oils by incorporating fatty acid composition in the standards. “Since the fatty acid composition is different for each edible oil, this amendment will go a long way in exposing and curbing two malpractices in the edible oil sector- adulteration of expensive oils with cheaper oils and misleading label claims on the composition of blended oils,” the regulator said in its notification. It is seeking comments from various stakeholders.
Ashwin Bhadri, CEO, Equinox Labs, said the new draft speaks about the percentage of fatty acids composition along with the different kinds of fatty acids founds in 20 types of edible oils besides their permissible limits. “This regulation will provide clarity to edible oil makers and testing authorities. It will also benefit consumers by bringing in transparency regarding the oil composition that they consume and ensure their safety,” he added.Organic food
Meanwhile, FSSAI also released a draft notification on organic food that aims to bring in a regulatory framework to ensure safety of such products as well their authentic organic status.
According to the draft FSS (Organic Foods) Regulations, any food offered for sale as “organic food’’ should comply with the provisions laid down under either the National Programme for Organic Production or the Participatory Guarantee System for India or any other systems notified by the FSSAI.
The draft regulation also mandates that such foods should convey accurate information on the organic status of the product and should carry a certificate or quality assurance mark, among other things.

BAN ON IMPORT OF CHINESE MILK PRODUCTS EXTENDED BY A YR

The Government on Thursday extended the ban on import of milk and its products from China for one more year till June 2018. India had first imposed the ban in September 2008 when it was feared that some milk consignments from the country contained melamine, a toxic chemical used for making plastics and fertilisers.
"Prohibition on import of milk and milk products (including chocolates and chocolate products and candies/ confectionery/ food preparations with milk or milk solids as an ingredient) from China is extended for one more year, i.e., till 23.6.2018 or until their safety is established or their credential is established on the basis of the credible reports," said a senior officer from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
The ban, which expired on June 23, is extended every year.
India does not import milk products from China, but has imposed the ban as a preventive measure. Milk contaminated with melamine, a chemical which causes kidney stones in young children had led to several deaths in China in 2008,
India is the world's largest producer and consumer of milk. Among states, Uttar Pradesh is the leading milk producer, followed by Rajasthan and Gujarat.

How Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu Effects On Health

Adulterated Milk, Kalthi Palu, Chemicals in Milk, Adulterated Milk Health Problems, Kalthi Palu Health Problems, Health Problems Due To Chemicals in Milk, Health Problems Due To Adulterated Milk
Are you drinking milk every day? Is your kid-child drinking milk daily? then beware, a daily glass of milk can cause serious health issues like heart problem, cancer, and sometimes even death. have a look.. According to the Government of India, over 68 percent of milk in the country does not conform to the standards set by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
A glass of Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu contains highly toxic chemicals which effect our health badly. urea, water, caustic soda, paint, sugar, detergent Hydrogen Peroxide, carbonates, bicarbonates, starch, glucose, salt, Skimmed Milk Powder (SMP) and vegetable fat are used to make synthetic milk or adulterated milk and milk products.
Unknown thing is some dairy farms are giving injections to yield more milk and that milk contains toxins that release into the milk which cause hormone imbalance in women and men, Early breast development in girls, Male breast (gynecomastia), Hormonal imbalance in children, Heart diseases including cardiac arrhythmia, increased or decreased blood pressure, premature ventricular contraction etc., Impaired menstrual flow in girls and women, Eye loss, Kidney diseases, Memory loss are seen. Also chemicals which are sprayed on grass is eaten by cow or buffalo or goat produces milk which may contains toxins which are dangerous to our health.
Below Are How Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu Effects On Health:
If Urea is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it damages the intestinal track and digestive system, It over burdens kidneys as they have to filter out urea content from the body.
If Detergents is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it creates health hazards like digestive system disorders, diarrhea (Motions), effects on kidney functioning
If Formalin is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it causes organ dysfunction besides damaging the intestinal track and digestive system, it can increase the chances of cancer, Skin diseases and eye disease, chances of kidney failure
If Starch is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it reduces the nutritive values in milk, you may suffer with diarrhea (Motions) and may prove fatal for sugar patients ie Diabetes (sugar disease)
If Sugar is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then chances of epidemic diseases. There are chances of getting Diabetes (sugar disease), It can be fatal for those who have kidney problems
If Salt is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it reduces the nutritive values in milk, people may suffer with high BP, It can be fatal for those who have kidney problems
If Hydrogen Peroxide is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it effects on intestinal track and digestive system causing ulcers, gastritis such as stomach burn, bloating and stomach cramps (stomach pains), it may increase heart beat and cause cardiac arrhythmia, It also cause early aging.
If carbonates and bicarbonates is present in Adulterated Milk-Kalthi Palu then it effects on fertility, It causes disruption in harmone signaling that regulates development and reproduction.

Hair in your food is not just disgusting, it's also poisonous

A doctor shares exactly why you should be extremely careful about human hair getting into your food.
Imagine you've taken a lunch or dinner break at your favourite restaurant, just to get a taste of your favourite dish. Your order comes, and you tuck into that yummy meal. But midway through, you find a teeny-tiny piece of hair in your food.
We know what your response would be: YUCK! And we thoroughly agree. It's gross, and you just shouldn't have to go through it. But the fact of life is that hair ends up in our food quite often and quite accidentally, whether it's in a restaurant or at home. Come on, admit it, you've discovered your dear mom's hair in the delicious dal at least once or twice?
It's still okay if you identify the hair in your dish in time. But what if you can't? What if you accidentally eat it? There's no way you an get away with it without repercussions. This is the reason restaurants, bakeries and food processing units have to follow hair control measures. Ingesting hair is just not healthy.
A very hairy issue
Human hair is made up of the protein keratin, which also makes up the outer layer of the skin and nails. In itself, keratin might not pose a problem. But the truth is that, besides making you feel nauseated, hair can lead to contamination in foods. It is one of the leading physical contaminants in food, along with stones, metal pieces, insect parts, rodent droppings etc.
All of these can cause physical harm as well as result in foodborne illnesses like cholera, typhoid, jaundice etc. To ensure food safety the FSSAI has established hygiene and sanitation guidelines as per Schedule 4 of the regulations, which mentions that human hair must be controlled from falling into exposed foods in eateries as well as in food processing and manufacturing plants.
Contamination
Human hair is termed a physical as well as a microbiological contaminant, because it can lead to the growth of microorganisms in the food. Oil, sweat, residue of hair treatment chemicals and shampoos, dyes or any other organic matter sticking to the hair becomes a breeding ground for pathogens when left in processed foods for long periods of time.
A report published by the National Institute of Science, Technology, and Development Studies, New Delhi, on human hair waste states that hair could contain a number of toxic chemical contaminants. These contaminants reach the hair from the environment, and so these same toxic substances can reach food from human hair.
Health risks and precautions
You can choke on hair in food, or it can make your vomit. But that apart, human hair can transmit ringworm as well as fungal infections if a person is infected by these. Staph aureus, as it's often called, is a type of bacteria that can be found on the skin and hair as well as in the noses and throats of people and animals.
Getting a bacterial infection is just not what you'd want, so it's always best to take some precautions. Make sure anybody who cooks for you wears hairnets, headbands, caps, beard covers or other effective hair restraints. If a restaurant is known for faulty safety or hygiene standards, don't go there (even if it means you won't be able to taste a dish you love), because prevention is better than cure any day.

Jun 22, 2017

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


Tobacco trader moves HC against action on product

Chennai, Jun 21 (PTI) A city-based trader of the tobacco product, Hans Chaap, today moved the Madras High Court for restraining government authorities from taking penal action against the item.
The petition by V N Arumugam and company, which came up before Justice M Govindaraj, sought a direction for restraining the Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration from taking penal action against the product, claiming that it was made of tobacco only.
When the matter came up, Special Government Pleader sought time to file a counter in this connection.
The judge then posted the matter for hearing to June 23.
Referring to a notification issued by the Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration, which was extended up to 2018, banning the manufacture, storage, transport, distribution or sale of gutkha and pan masala, the petitioner said their product is made of tobacco only and no eatables have been included.
Thus the notification is not applicable to the product, the petitioner said.
He argued that their product is nothing but a tobacco product falling under item 6 in the schedule to the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce, production, supply and distribution) (CTP) Act, 2003. The petitioner said theirs is a tobacco product, for which CTP Act will apply and not the FSSA (Food Safety and Standards) Act.
He also said the ban imposed by the Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration on manufacture, storage, distribution or sale of gutka, pan masala, chewing tobacco and any other food product containing tobacco or nicotine is not applicable to tobacco products.

Spice in your food could be brick dust

HYDERABAD: At a time, when police are cracking down on food adulteration, nutritionists and doctors are pressing alarm bells on health hazards from toxic concoctions on your plate.
At least seven big rackets were busted in last three months in Hyderabad and citizens are being told to be careful about what they buy from the open market.
Police officials who busted adulteration rings say gang members operate from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, where food adulteration is rampant. It's just not milk or cooking oil, prized spices too are heavily adulterated, according to officials of National Institute of Nutrition.
"Many times, papaya seeds are grounded and mixed with synthetic gum to make it seem like black-pepper.This happens as pepper is costly and mixing them with papaya seeds makes it cheaper for miscreants," Dr V Sudarshan Rao, a scientist from the Food Safety Division of NIN, told TOI.
Following black pepper, the next most adulterated food item is fennel, which is mixed with sodium hydrosulphite. "This is then blended with sawdust and brick dust and sold in the market as masala powder," said an official from Nutrition Society of India.
Not just food meant for daily consumption, even cold drinks and ice-creams are mixed with high quantities of glycerol monostearate, an emulsifying agent, which is meant to be used in moderate amounts as prescribed by Food Standards and Safety Authority of India (FSSAI).
"People are not aware that in current times, everything we eat could be adulterated. Earlier, the practice was limited to mixing rice with stones to fudge weight. Now, it has become modern with miscreants using chemicals. Even mustard oil is sold by mixing it with a low-grade oil. There's no mechanism in place to curb this menace," said Dr B Sesikiran, director of NSI.
"While the food regulator has to monitor, check and penalize people who adulterate food, nothing moves on the ground. Till punishment is harsh, you cannot expect to have safe food," he said.
TIMES VIEW:

While its a welcome move that cops have finally launched a sustained crackdown against adulteration of spices and other food items in the city, efforts must be made to ensure that these traders do not get back to their old practice. Authorities should also ensure that these offenders get strict punishment and are not allowed to get away with minor penalties for playing with lives of people on a daily basis.

Yet again, Cockroach found in lunch served at hotel Annapoorna

A customer at Annapoorna Hotel in R.S. Puram was shocked to find a cockroach in the lunch that was served to him this afternoon.
Subash Sundaram, an IT professional, ordered chapatis and curd semiya for lunch. When the curd semiya was served to him, he was shocked to notice a cockroach in the food. When he confronted the person who served the lunch, the server immediately removed the plate from the table.
However, Subash managed to click pictures of the curd semiya with the cockroach and posted it on social media.
“When I asked the manager, he admitted that it was a mistake and that he would take steps to prevent such incidents. But this is not the first time. Earlier on one occasion, I noticed a dead fly in the sambar that was served to me,” Subash said and added that he would formally lodge a complaint with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.
The customer has filed a complaint with the FSSAI on the unhygienic kitchen at the hotel that is supposedly considered the pride of Coimbatore.
The Covai Post had earlier reported about a similar incident in the same branch of the hotel. The hotel denied all the charges and the hotel management had unleashed a malicious campaign to tarnish the image of the news portal that had reported about the unclean kitchen and the callous attitude of the management in rectifying it.

FDA checking presence of performance boosters in nutraceuticals

Nagpur: With the aim of finding out whether nutraceuticals act as a booster to sportspersons, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is trying to collect samples of various nutraceuticals available in the market and sending them for testing of their ingredients.
It raided certain godowns of Herbal Life in city and seized material costing Rs17 lakh. Samples from this material have been sent for testing in the laboratory.
MS Deshpande, joint commissioner FDA (Food), told TOI that the sampling is being done to check the presence of any 'boosters' or performance enhancers in the nutraceuticals. The Food Safety Authority of India (FSAI) along with FDA is conducting a nationwide survey to check whether there are any performance enhancing elements in the health supplements.
"The National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) has found that certain athletes and players are testing positive despite not consuming any drugs. There is thus an assumption that the nutraceuticals might contain certain elements which act as boosters," said Deshpande. This particular lot was seized from Herbal Life's godown at 105, Royal House, Gajanan Nagar.
Deshpande said that as per labels on the containers of nutraceuticals like health supplements (personalized protein powder), proprietary food products (nutritional shake mix and nutraceutical (Herbal Control) have certain caffeine contents.
"We don't know whether the caffeine content is beyond the permissible limit of 300 ppm but we have sent samples for testing. And only certain beverages are allowed to put caffeine in their energy drinks and not all health supplement foods," added Deshpande.
Besides players a lot of younger generation is also consuming the nutraceuticals in the gymnasiums. Hence the issue gains more importance because of very high consumption of these health supplements in large quantities by young people.
The raid was conducted at the godown by a team of FDA officials headed by Deshpande and comprised FSO or Food safety Officer (vigilance) Abhay Deshpande, FSOs Pravin Umap, Seema Surkar and Kiran Gedam.

VMC orders 37 food vendors to shut shop

Vadodara: Food safety officers of the Vadodara Municipal Corporation (VMC) cracked down upon food business operators who had not taken permission under the Food Safety and Standards Act. Officials said that as many as 37 shops were asked to shut down immediately. They have been warned not to start operations again till they have registered themselves. Officials issued directives to shop owners to register themselves immediately.

Jun 21, 2017

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS

 

Tobacco Is Not A ‘Food Product’, No Action Can Be Taken Against Manufactures Under FSSAI Act

The Madras High Court has observed that tobacco is not a food product for the purpose of Food Safety and Standards Act and no proceedings can be initiated against the manufacturers under the Act.
Justice M. Duraiswamy referred to a decision of Madurai Bench of the High Court wherein it held that persons who are manufacturing Gutkha and Pan Masala cannot be proceeded under the FSSAI. Tobacco is covered under the COTA (Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003). 
The High Court of Kerala has also ruled in the same lines. It had (in facts of that case) held as follows:
  • Tobacco or tobacco products are not food as defined under Section 3(j) of the FSS Act and it is not a food product as specified in the Regulation 2.3.4 of the Regulations.
  • Tobacco and tobacco products are to be manufactured and sold strictly in accordance with the provisions of the CTP Act and the Rules framed thereunder.
  • The Food safety authorities have no right take any action against tobacco or tobacco products by virtue of Government Order dated 22.05.2012.
A firm which has been manufacturing tobacco products since the year 1972, had assailed the action taken by Food Safety officer wherein, tobacco products manufactured by the petitioner was collected by the Food Safety Officer from their shop. 
The High Court has set aside the proceedings against the firm. “The petitioner is manufacturing fine quality tobacco with prior licence obtained without violating any provisions of law, the ratio laid down by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court squarely applies to the present case.”, the Bench observed.

Six food business operators fined Rs 60,000 in Srinagar

Srinagar 
Six business operators were fined Rs 60,000 for selling and processing food articles in unsanitary condition in Srinagar, an official spokesman said here this evening.
He said a team of officers of Food Safety headed by Assistant Commissioner Food Safety inspected various areas of Srinagar district today.
During the inspection, on the spot tests of milk and milk products were conducted by virtue of mobile testing laboratory. On the basis of results of samples ten quintals of milk was destroyed on spot.
The milk suppliers and vendors were warned not to supply substandard milk to consumers.
The adjudicating officer Srinagar imposed a fine of Rs 60,000 on six food business operators for selling and processing food articles in unsanitary condition.

DON’T FEAR A DELHI BELLY

Health consciousness goes beyond hitting the gym every single day; it’s about what goes into your stomach. Team Viva explores the different aspects of food safety with experts
In these days of social media, the consumer response to food determines how well or badly a restaurant does. Feelings are vented by showering praises or heaping scorn on a food item and one bad review, even if uninformed, on a platform can make or break a business. During a talk on food safety at the Oxford Book Store, corporate chef at The Roseate, Nishant Choubey, talked about the perilous impact of instant noodles-type opinionating and how once he was at the receiving end himself when a customer threatened him with a bad review. But he insisted his method of preparation was safe and proper and he wouldn’t bend his ways to compromise food quality. 
Bad reviews are just one aspect of the food business, food safety being one of the primary things that has to be looked at. Delhi is known for a lot of reasons; its infamous Delhi Belly, which even inspired a movie, is one of them. Cleanliness, hygiene and food safety are ways to ensure one doesn’t suffer from it. “When it comes to relying on the quality of our food, be it the ones on sale in the supermarkets, the one we buy from our local sabzi mandis or the food that we eat in restaurants is based on trust”, says Saurabh Arora, founder of Foodsafetyhelpline.com.
What constitutes food? We constantly worry about the nutritional value of our food, we selectively pick and choose the things we fill our shopping baskets with. Arora clarifies, “There is a very thin line that separates what can be classified as food and what can’t be. Ayurvedic medicines, protein supplements and vitamin supplements fall outside the category of food, whilst water, beverages, honey and chips are all considered to be food.” Food does not fall under the food regulation guidelines that exist in India during the period in which it remains under the farmer’s control. However, as soon as it enters the processing stage, it is subject to regulations.
The Food Safety and Standards Association of India (FSSAI) was introduced in 2006. Arora explains that in between the producer and consumer, exists the Food Business Operator (FBO). “This refers to any individual who comes after the farmer in the supply chain and is involved in processing, manufacturing or selling food. This could be a transporter, the canteen wala or the golgappa vala. On the other hand, multinational companies such as Nestle, Heinz or Coca Cola are also FBO. A licence is essential for an FBO to operate.”
Excessive use of impurities like pesticides and heavy metals are always in the news and an area of concern. However, Arora feels that the eminent danger at microbiological level is that pathogens, crop-contaminating elements and antibiotics will make their way to our food. There have been instances where antibiotics have been found in honey. The regulations that existed before the FSSAI was put into place had neglected the microbiology of foods. He further adds that adulteration, although not as big a problem, is still rampant. Adultration refers to the addition of a food item in order to increase the quantity of food item in raw form or prepared form, which may result in the loss of actual quality of food item. Nowadays, even the non-intentional addition of extraneous substances to food is becoming a worry. With regard to packaged foods, the problem lies in using too many food additives. These are substances added to food in order to preserve flavour or enhance its taste, thereby making it fizzier, tangier or even last longer. At the end of the day, these are all chemicals. Fortunately for us, the FSSAI closely monitors the levels of these in all food substances.
The food business has the responsibility of ensuring that safe and healthy food is distributed to its customers. The regulating authorities such as FSSAI, the consumers and food businesses all have to work together towards a successful and self-regulating supply chain of food.
Thankfully, the people in charge of processing our food know the drill. They’re able to best judge what is healthy for us and what is not. According to Choubey, “There is ample awareness about food safety laws.” He says his restaurant does not compromise on the quality of raw material provided by the suppliers. “The chicken that we receive must be refrigerated rather than stored floating in water. I’m not sure how hygienic or pure that water is, so why should I accept chicken that’s been stored in it?”
Choubey advises his staff to follow certain rules. The first is ‘clean’. Upon his insistence, his team members keep washing their hands for as long as it takes them to sing the ‘happy birthday’ song. The song is an indicator of how long they should wash and rinse their hands. “Ideally, we should wash our hands every twenty minutes. Neither our workplace, nor our homes should be dirty. Keep disinfectants close at hand. Secondly, separate your food items. Don’t cut fish with meat, or fish with vegetables,” he says. Choubey advises against shortcuts. Butchery should be done separately. He says that even when you go shopping, you should carry two baskets — one for dry grocery and the other for vegetables.
There are precautions to be taken while cooking as well. “You must have heard of the food poisoning incident that took place in a very reputed hotel. The staff had been served food from the buffet. This had raised a lot of eyebrows because we had presumed the debate over preserving food for as long as possible in order to lower food costs was a thing of the past. Apparently not. Now, it is mandatory for any hotel or restaurant to throw away food that’s been kept for longer than four hours in a buffet,” he says.
Also, he elaborates on the need for serving food at the right temperature. “Hot food must be served hot and cold be served cold. For food to be served cold it needs to be lower than five degrees Fahrenheit and hot food is characterised by being above sixty-three degrees,” he says. 
Choubey’s last rule is regarding “chill.” This refers to the process of refrigeration. “Chicken and fish must be kept in separate, vacuum-packed shelves,” he says.
Dr Pawan Vats, vice-president at Auriga Research, explains the concept of making claims on food. “Food claims are a sensitive issue and must be substantiated in the form of scientific data. The total number of calories per 100 gm of the substance, total protein, total carbohydrate, sugars, and total fat content must be stated before any claim can be made.” Even the langar and prasad distributed in gurudwaras and temples have to follow FSSAI regulations.
Clearly, the need to obsessively worry over the contents of our food is a thing of the past. If things weren’t going so smoothly, there would have been calamities every other day. This is not the case right now. So, we are in safe hands.

Drive against substandard milk suppliers in Srinagar

Mobile food testing lab introduced to assess quality of milk
Srinagar: Drugs and Food Control Organisation Tuesday organised a drive against selling of substandard milk in Srinagar.
The drive saw introduction of mobile food testing van to test the quality of milk supplied and sold the city.
Assistant Commissioner Food Safety Measures, Hilal Ahmad Mir told Kashmir Reader that they had complaints about milk sellers selling substandard milk to people in the city.
He said that they held inspection of milk at Srinagar-Jammu highway near Sempora, Panthachowk, Dalgate, Khayam and Alamgari Bazar areas of Srinagar. He assured that the mobile food testing laboratory would help them to maintain standard of food items and people would get quality eatables in the city.

50 people taken ill owing to suspected food poisoning in Kolar district

Tension gripped Nukkanahalli village in Kolar taluk after around 50 people took ill owing to suspected food poisoning at a marriage reception on Monday night.
Some of the people, who attended the marriage reception and consumed meals on Monday night in the village, started vomiting and experienced stomach pain after returning home. They initially took treatment from local hospitals.
Later, a team of doctors and other Health Department staff led by , rushed to the village. They set up a camp at the government school in the village and treated the patients. Some were treated at Sri Narasimha Raja District Hospital and discharged. “It was a case of mild food poisoning and there is no need to panic,” the DHO told The Hindu. said. The condition of the victims is is stable, the DHO added . An ambulance has been stationed in the village. Also, food samples have been sent to the laboratory concerned for tests, he said.

Jun 20, 2017

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAMANI NEWS


187 milk samples were found ‘substandard’, TN tells court

CHENNAI, 
The Tamil Nadu government told the Madras High Court that 187 milk samples were found to be either ‘substandard’ or ‘misbranded’.
It had launched 143 cases, convicted 81 and imposed a penalty of ₹10.26 lakh. The milk samples were taken from all the 32 districts with 886 samples analysed.
Substandard could be dilution of milk with water or addition of vegetable fats while misbranded could be labelling mistake or ingredients not mentioned.
With regard to milk products, Tamil Nadu Health Secretary J Radhakrishnan said in a status report submitted to the Court today that out of the 338 samples taken from all the districts, 11 were found ‘unsafe’ and 132 were found to be ‘substandard’ and ‘misbranded.’ The State government had launched 83 cases, convicted 56 and imposed a penalty of ₹6 lakh.
Out of 11 unsafe samples of milk products, six were due to presence of colours (Tartrazine, Rhodamnine and Carmoisine) while in the remaining five, there were presence of micro organisms like Coliform, detergent, yeast and mould-1.
The survey was done between August 2011 and May 2017, the State government said in the report.
Radhakrishnan filed the report on behalf of the Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development Department in response to the Court seeking a status report on steps taken for the implementation the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 particularly in relation to allegation of adulteration of milk meant for children.
Early this month, the first Bench of Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar sought the status report while hearing a PIL filed by Congress advocate AP Suryaprakasam on allegations of adulteration in milk by private milk companies. The PIL also referred to recent statements made by Dairy Development Minister Rajendra Balaji that private milk producers indulged in adulteration, and that samples were sent to various labs for testing.
Radhakrishnan said that the State government has reconstituted state-level steering committee/district level steering committee to ensure availability of safe milk.
The Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration has been directed to check the menace of adulterated milk and take stringent action against dairy owners, dairy operators and retailers if chemical adulterants like pesticides or caustic soda were found in the milk.
The Food Safety and Drug Administration has been asked to identify high risk area where there is greater presence of petty food manufacturer/ business operator.

886 milk samples tested in 32 districts, safe: TN govt to HC

The Tamil Nadu government today informed the Madras High Court that 886 samples of milk taken from 32 districts were examined and found safe. 
However, 11 of the 338 samples of milk products tested were found unsafe for consumption.
The Health and Family Welfare department stated this in its report filed in the court with regard to the action taken on complaints of adulteration of milk. 
The department filed its report on the high court's direction issued during the hearing of a lawsuit filed by an advocate, Suryaprakasam, seeking a CBI probe into the reports of adulteration in milk by various private producers in the state. 
Health and Family Welfare Department Secretary J Radhakrishnan in his affidavit submitted that none of the 886 samples lifted and analysed between August 5, 2011 and May 31, 2017, were found unsafe. 
As many as 187 samples were found sub-standard and misbranded, following which 143 cases were registered and a penalty of Rs 10,26,300 was collected, he submitted. 
The affidavit added that the department had on June 15 formed a state-level steering committee headed by chief secretary and district-level steering committees under the chairmanship of district collectors for smooth operation of regulatory provisions of the 'Tamil Nadu Food Safety and Standards Act 2006.' 
On analysing the milk products, the counter stated, out of the 338 samples tested in 32 districts, 11 were found unsafe and 132 samples were found sub-standard and misbranded. 
As many as 83 cases were lodged and a penalty of Rs 6,00,500 was collected, it said. 
Elaborating on sub-standard milk products, Radhakrishnan said dilution with water, addition of vegetable fats, less fat are treated as sub-standard. 
The official further submitted that a communication had already been sent on November 1, 2016 to authorities concerned to adhere to the directions and observations made by the Supreme Court on the issue.

Report on milk adulteration finds 11 samples unsafe

56 convicted and Rs. 6 lakh penalty imposed, Health Secretary tells HC
The State government has informed the Madras High Court that out of the 338 milk/ milk product samples lifted from 32 districts in the State between August 5, 2016 and May 31, 2017, eleven were found to be unsafe, 132 substandard and misbranded.
Micro organisms
“Out of the 11 unsafe samples, six are due to the presence of colours Tartrazine – 3, Rhodamine – 2 and Carmoisine – 1. The remaining five samples were found with micro organisms like Coliform-3, Detergent-1, Yeast and Mould-1. Totally 83 cases were registered in which 56 were convicted and penalty imposed to the tune of Rs. 6 lakh,” the report field by the J. Radhakrishnan, Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department said.
Mr. Radhakrishnan made the submissions on a PIL filed by advocate A.P. Suryaprakasam seeking proper action by the authorities concerned on the allegations of milk adulteration in the State.
Survey conducted
The Health Secretary filed the detailed status report on the action taken to curb milk adulteration across the State. The report added that as per the instructions of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, New Delhi, a survey was conducted in Chennai, Coimbatore, Madurai, Tiruchi, Salem, Ambattur, Tirunelveli, and Hosur for the period from November 2016 to December, 2016.
Out of 106 milk samples tested, two were reported unsafe, 22 substandard, and 82 as conforming to standards, he added.
Out of a total of 32 fresh samples lifted from Vellore, Thiruchi, Thanjavur, Thiruvarur, Madurai and Ramanathapuram between February 1 and March 31, none was found to be unsafe, eight turned out to be substandard due to dilution with water and addition of vegetable fats, the report said.
The government further informed the High Court that through a government order dated June 15, State and district-level steering committees to check adulteration had been reconstituted by including the Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Fisheries Department, Director of Milk Production and Dairy Development, and the Deputy Registrar (Dairy).

Food traders warned against operating without licence

The district administration has warned operation of businesses in food commodities without the requisite licence mandated by the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulation, 2011.
All traders in food commodities, grocers, hotel owners, tea stalls, sweet and savoury manufacturers and retailers, roadside shopkeepers, bakeries, meat sellers, vegetable and fruit stalls milk producers, and traders, canteens running in schools, college, industrial units, caterers to wedding halls, wholesale and retailers among others are now required to be licensed with permit to operate under the Act.
According to the administration, enough time had been accorded since the coming into force of the Act in May 2011.
Therefore, it is illegal to operate business without permits. Businesses with an annual turnover of Rs. 12 lakh shall pay Rs. 100 per annum in the district treasury and register on www.foodlicencing.fssai.gov.in along with a photo and valid identity.
The affidavit may be downloaded and submitted to the Food Safety Officer in person or through post.
Alternatively, business operators may take the assistance of Common Service Centres.
Further, for those with an annual turnover exceeding Rs. 12 lakh, the annual fee towards permit is Rs. 2,000. Details regarding registration may be obtained from the District Food Safety and Drug Administration Department, Collectorate; 04342-230385.
Those already with existing permits are required to verify the validity and renew their licence before their validity expires. Renewal of licences before the expiry of validity will prevent levy of penalty and also enable the manufacturers to retain the same registration number printed on the packets of their food products.
Any complaints on food standards may be forwarded to the Food Safety Department’s whatsapp 94440 42322.

Packaged food firms will soon have to disclose GM content: FSSAI

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is working on the final guidelines on the labelling of GM foods
New Delhi: Soon, packaged food companies will have to disclose details of genetically modified (GM) ingredients used in processed food on the labels. The country’s food regulator, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), is working on the final guidelines on the labelling of GM foods, its chief executive officer Pawan Kumar Agarwal said.
“Genetically modified items are being used in a lot of processed foods. Consumers have the right to know which products may have GM items. The scientific panel has already started work on this, and we’ll soon finalise the labeling norms,” said Agarwal.
Earlier this month, officials of FSSAI and members of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), which regulates GM foods in India, had a meeting on the issue. FSSAI has the responsibility of regulating GM products used in processed food but those GM products have to be approved by GEAC, according to the Food safety and Standards Act, 2006.
At present, companies are not required to declare presence of GM ingredients in a food item in India, and a lot of imported processed foods have GM items. GEAC had, in April, expressed concern on the absence of regulations on processed GM foods, Mint reported on 9 May.
Last month, GEAC had approved commercial cultivation of GM mustard in India which the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change will have to clear. To date, India allows commercial production of GM crop Bt cotton only. While Bt brinjal has the approval, the government did not introduce this due to widespread protests against the technology.
Till recently, India did not allow import of GM foods. In a written reply to the Lok Sabha last July, Nirmala Sitharaman, minister of state, ministry of commerce and industry, had said that the customs can clear GM food products after necessary approval by FSSAI, and the food regulator had not cleared import of any GM food. According to norms, import of GM foods requires prior approval from the GEAC.
In an unrelated development, FSSAI allowed import of 72 special food items meant for children with ‘Inborn errors of Metabolism’ last week. These food items, which can only be consumed under the supervision of healthcare professionals, are manufactured by only a handful of companies worldwide. The makers of these products include the local arm of US-based baby food maker Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, French Dairy firm Danone SA-owned Nutricia International Pvt. Ltd, American healthcare firm Abbott Healthcare Pvt. Ltd and Swiss packaged food company Nestle SA’s local entity Nestle India Ltd. FSSAI has allowed import of these products for two years, or till it comes out with standards for them.

Beware, The King of Fruits Can Be Tainted With Carcinogens

As a kid, I used to get excited about the summer holidays for two reasons. One, because it meant not having to wake up early for school and two, it meant a near unlimited supply of mangoes (courtesy my extremely indulgent father). At the time, I had no idea that mangoes were often artificially ripened with calcium carbide, and even if I did, I wouldn't have been able to tell the artificially ripened mangoes apart from the naturally ripened ones. Thankfully, my dad knew the difference and it's a really good thing that he did because eating artificially ripened fruit can have some really nasty side effects. According to news reports, large quantities of artificially ripened fruits are being sold in the market.
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has noted that calcium carbide is a carcinogen, and the Food Safety and Standards Rules prohibit the use of carbide generated gas for ripening fruits.
Calcium carbide when mixed with water, releases acetylene gas which speeds up the ripening of the fruit. A study linked calcium carbide to a whole host of side effects, ranging from dizziness to memory loss and seizures. The study noted that these effects occur because calcium carbide contains traces of arsenic and phosphorous. The study also pointed out that calcium carbide can cause irritation in the eye and skin rashes. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has noted that calcium carbide is a carcinogen, and the Food Safety and Standards Rules prohibit the use of carbide generated gas for ripening fruits.
So, how do you tell the difference between delicious, naturally ripened mangoes and potentially toxic artificially ripened mangoes? One way is just by looking at them. Naturally ripened mangoes don't look as good as their artificially ripened counterparts and are not uniformly coloured. Another way to tell the difference is by the smell. Naturally ripened mangoes generally have a stronger aroma than artificially ripened ones. According to the FSSAI, artificially ripened fruits are also overly soft, and inferior in taste and flavour.
Despite being aware of the signs which indicate that a mango has been artificially ripened, it is still quite likely that many people will end up buying it. In that case, the FSSAI recommends that the fruit be washed thoroughly before it is consumed.
They also have a shorter shelf life.
Despite being aware of the signs which indicate that a mango has been artificially ripened, it is still quite likely that many people will end up buying it. In that case, the FSSAI recommends that the fruit is washed thoroughly before it is consumed. It also recommends that, as far as possible, its skin should be peeled off. For mangoes and apples, the FSSAI advises that they should be cut, rather than eaten as a whole (something I've been guilty of doing quite often).
Fruit is an important part of people's diets, and mangoes aren't called the 'king of fruits' for no reason. They are extremely popular and every summer, people, myself included, tend to eat a lot of mangoes. Given their popularity, it is crucial that we take the time to ensure that we only buy naturally ripened mangoes. Do your taste buds and your health a favour!

Modern slaughterhouses mooted in 12 local bodies

THRISSUR: The state government is planning to set up 12 modern slaughterhouses under urban local bodies across the state, apart from reviving about 20-odd slaughterhouses, which are remaining unused. The urban local bodies selected for implementing the project are Kanhangad, Kannur, Kozhikode, Perinthalmanna, Kondotty, Palakkad, Kunnamkulam, Chalakudy, Aluva, Thiruvalla, Punaloor and Thiruvananthapuram.
Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) is likely to invest Rs 100 crore for the project. According to minister for local self-government K T Jaleel the ensuing board meeting of the KIIFB would accord sanction to project.
The slaughterhouses would be equipped with modern facilities for slaughtering as well as for waste processing, he said.
The urban local bodies which have been selected for the setting up of the project, have been asked to submit willingness within a week.
The local bodies have to provide land for the project.
Suchitwa Mission has already invited companies to submit expressions of interest for empaneling the agencies for the execution of the project.
The KIIFB project evaluator Dr P V Mohanan said now only one modern slaughter house located at Brahmagiri in Wayanad was available for the public. Meat Products of India (MPI) has set up a modern slaughterhouse at Koothattukulam for the company's own use.
This is despite the fact that the 3.3 lakh cattle, 6.54 lakh buffaloes, and 3.38 lakh goats are being slaughtered in the state annually. Similarly, at least 15 lakh birds including chicken are also being slaughtered in the state per each day.
Latest CommentSaving Lives Is More Important Than Abstract Moral Concerns, Financial Incentives Should Be Used to Increase Organ Donation to save many lives, Consider Our financial reward that can change you and y... Read MoreJames Gullen
"About 15,680 slaughtering centres are functioning in the state, with the registration given by the local bodies. However, as per the Food Safety and Standards Act, the slaughter houses must have licenses issued by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, from 2016. But none of these slaughtering centres have those licences," Mohanan said.
"Similarly, around 9,600 tonnes of meat waste is being generated at the poultry slaughtering centres alone in the state," Mohanan said. "Currently, most of the waste is being purchased by some illegal agents, who then dump it on the roadside and uninhabited areas at night hours. With the setting up of modern slaughtering units, the issue of waste treatment will also be over, which might, in turn, reduce the stray dog menace as well," he said.

Jun 18, 2017

‘RO filter producers not following dissolved salts rule’

NEW DELHI: The country is facing a serious water crisis of a different nature. RO (reverse osmosis) filter machines available in India are sold without the mandatory certification of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), making the water they treat potentially dangerous to health. 
BIS rules mandate that any product sold in India, which relates to the safety of the consumer needs the ISI mark. The BIS in its wisdom has omitted to include ROs from its list, though many big bottled water companies have got the necessary ISI certification. 
Acting on a petition from an NGO, ‘Friends’, the National Green Tribunal has sought a response from the Ministry of Water Resources and other concerned bodies. RO companies, which aggressively market their products with celebrities offering 100 per cent pure water, do not state the water does not meet the approval of the certifying authority.
On the RTI question whether the RO companies have applied for certification, BIS said that queries on the matter have been sent to various departments.
The petition said that though the BIS has failed to set the minimum level of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), it has specified the maximum level.
TDS is the dissolved ionized solids, such as salts and minerals in water. BIS has stipulated the upper limit of TDS in drinking water at 500 ppm. The lower level is 30 ppm to keep the mineral content at safe levels. De-mineralised water is mostly used in batteries and various industrial works.
The petition points out RO manufacturers are blatantly flouting the statutory BIS rules which state that “all RO manufacturers should write on their products that ‘RO system is not recommended for Arsenic level above 0.01 mg/l and flouride level above 8.0 mg/l’.”
With water in Indian homes coming from questionable sources and containing various toxic substances and chemicals, there is no guarantee that ROs have the capability to treat it to meet health safety standards, thanks to BIS.

Think before you drink


NEW DELHI: The country is facing a serious water crisis of a different nature. RO (reverse osmosis) filter machines available in India are sold without the mandatory certification of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), making the water they treat potentially dangerous to health. BSI rules mandate that any product sold in India, which relates to the safety of the consumer, needs the ISI mark.
The BIS in its wisdom has omitted to include ROs from its list, though many big bottled water companies have procured ISI certification—most trusted safety stamp for Indian consumers. Acting on a petition from an NGO, ‘Friends’, the National Green Tribunal has sought a response from the Ministry of Water Resources and other concerned bodies. RO companies, which aggressively market their products with celebrities offering 100 per cent pure water, do not declare whether their water meets the approval of the certifying authority.
On a RTI question whether the companies have applied for certification, BIS said all queries have been sent to various departments. Moreover, though the BIS has failed to set the minimum level of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)—the dissolved ionized solids, such as salts and minerals in water—it has specified the maximum level at 500 ppm. The lower TDS level is 30 ppm at which the mineral content in water are kept at safe levels. De-mineralised water is mostly used in batteries and various industrial works.
The petition points out RO manufacturers are blatantly flouting the statutory BIS rules which state that “all RO manufacturers should write on their products that ‘RO system is not recommended for Arsenic level above 0.01 mg/l and Fluoride level above 8.0 mg/l’.” With water in Indian homes coming from questionable sources and containing various toxic substances and chemicals, there is no guarantee that ROs have the capability to treat it to meet health safety standards, thanks to BIS.
In places where arsenic and fluoride levels exceed the said prescribed limits of water, people who use Reverse osmosis (RO) filters do not realise they are drinking poisonous water. “They are misled into believing they are drinking so-called safe water purified by their RO filters because of marketing gimmicks by the filter companies,” the petition alleged.
RO companies are blatantly flouting the National Water Policy 2012. BIS has allowed up to 80 per cent wastage of pre-treated potable water or ground water for point-of-use RO water filters, contrary to the water policy.
“The RO system was originally invented to create potable water from otherwise unusable sea water and was never meant for filtering ground water. At present, lakhs of people are buying RO systems, meaning that lakhs of people will waste around 80 per cent of potable water,” the plea said, seeking restraint on the sale of ROs that are selling without mandatory ISI certification.

FSSAI plans labelling of GM foods

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is planning a regime of labelling genetically modified (GM) foods, which do not exist in India as of now.
The move comes after India's apex regulator for GM foods, the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), approved India's first transgenic food crop GM Mustard for commercial cultivation last month. The environment ministry has to take a final call.
FSSAI, though responsible for testing food standards, is passing the buck on independent testing of the impact of GM foods on human health. Its officials said that the environment ministry should look at it.
"We had a meeting with FSSAI two weeks back and requested it to take over the approvals of processed GM foods. But they asked GEAC to continue appraising proposals for processed foods until they are ready to take over the entire regulation of GM foods and imported processed foods. Meanwhile, they will handle the labelling process," said Amita Prasad, additional secretary of the Environment Ministry.
Till now only one GM crop — Bt Cotton — is grown in Indian fields. The only other food crop to receive all approvals was Bt Brinjal. However, the government blocked its introduction. There has been widespread political and public opposition to the technology.
As per Section 22 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, FSSAI has the responsibility to regulate GM organisms and products once they are approved by GEAC. FSSAI even submitted a status report before the Supreme Court, which is hearing a case against commercial cultivation of GM Mustard, and stressed that no regulation is yet framed to regulate GM foods. DNA has reviewed a copy of the status report.
The development comes after GEAC flagged in April the absence of any regulatory mechanism to deal with the import of processed GM foods.
India is dependent on imports to meet its demand for edible oils, including mustard oil. But there has been opposition from some farmer groups that the GM technology will lead to industrialisation of food production and compromise food security.
While the Environment Ministry had excluded approvals of processed GM foods from its mandate through a 2007 notification, the Union Health Ministry requested it to continue regulating GM processed foods till FSSAI is able to look into the matter in a scientific manner.
As a result, the Environment Ministry began keeping the 2007 notification in abeyance at regular intervals, till it last expired on March 2016.
Speaking to DNA, FSSAI's chief executive officer, Pawan Kumar Agrawal, said, "Regarding GM foods, we come into the picture when GEAC allows certain crops to be cultivated in India. After clearance, all GM foods would be subject to the same standards that apply to regular food."
"The only requirement will be to see if it is above a certain threshold of certain GM protein found, then that has to be declared and that is what we are working on...the categories of food for which the labelling requirement will be made mandatory," he said.
In its status report before the top court, FSSAI dwelt on the complexity of the labelling regime. "Any labelling regime... will have practical implications on trade as it will necessitate implementation of large-scale threshold testing regimes and traceability protocols with back up documentation, which would cause significant escalation of costs."
Activists said that FSSAI should go beyond simply labelling GM foods. "We are talking about rigorous independent health safety assessment, and FSSAI should not get away from that role and also look at edible oils derived from GM crops," said Kavita Kuruganti of the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, a loose network of more than 400 organisations from 20 states working on farm issues.