Oct 4, 2012

350 kg of spurious tea seized from a trader in Tuticorin - THE HINDU

Officials seized 350 kgs of spurious tea stocked in the house of a wholesale trader at Ayyappan Nagar on Wednesday.
Following information from the public that a wholesale trader from Ayyappan Nagar in Tuticorin was selling spurious tea to other shopkeepers, Urban Food Safety Officers S. Chandramohan and T. Ramakrishnan on Wednesday raided the house of one Kannan, who had stored 350 kgs of tea dust packets with various brand labels for sale.
Unfit for human consumption
Since the officials suspected that the tea dust was not suitable for human consumption, the packets were seized.
If the tea samples sent for analysis under the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act,2006, showed that the tea was adulterated, fine up to Rs. 5 lakh could be imposed on the wholesale trader.
Consumption of spurious tea decoction may cause digestion problems initially, which may lead to ulcer and even cancer, the officials warned.

Labs will get Rs 25,000-30,000 cr; fisheries panel soon: FSSAI CEO Mohanty

S N Mohanty took over as the chief executive officer (CEO), Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), on May 7, 2012, at a crucial juncture – just a few months after the implementation of the Food Safety & Standards Regulations, 2011, in the country. During this five-month tenure, the new CEO has faced several challenges - extension of the licensing and registration deadline, establishment of proper infrastructure such as scientific panels, and labs, and perpetuation of deterrence mechanism like fines and punishments in ensuring complete food safety under the new law. In an exclusive interview with Abhitash Singh, he reveals the details.

It has been more than four months since you took the reins of the FSSAI CEO. How has your journey been so far?

Since taking charge as the FSSAI CEO, I have been able to do couple of things. Firstly the licensing part was under the table which I extended for a moratorium period of six months. Secondly I have standardised the lab testing parameters. We are inventing standard testing parameters like the one in Kolkata for Mumbai and other parts of the country too. Thirdly, I am concentrating on import control procedures, and fourthly, the risk management system is my priority, because it will fast-track the product approval. I have started the journey, and it is still on.

What is the status of food testing labs in the pipeline and scientific panels for various categories for food and beverages, as mandated by the Act?

We have about 70 accredited labs and 45 are being set up currently. By the end of the Twelfth Plan, there will be about 200 labs. In addition, there will be 70 intermediate labs and 30 referral labs. The investment for all these labs will be around Rs 25,000 to 30,000 crore. Presently we have eight scientific panels, and we will create a new panel for fishery products soon.

How much awareness has been built up with regard to food recalls under the new Act? Could you give some instances of food recalls in India since the Act came into force?

We are just ready with the Regulations. It has not yet come into effect. The Act came into force on August 5, 2011, and has just completed one year. We require Regulations in process. Regulations is pre-requisite. No, there is not even a single food recall under the new Act.

Is the process of formation of courts and adjudicating officers in various areas over? What are the highest fines and punishments that has been awarded to offenders?

Yes, it is over. With regards to tribunal only a few states have done it, and others are in the process of doing it. The highest fines at some places were Rs 20 lakh.

Under many FDAs and FDCAs, there have been numerous complaints about the lack of food safety officers (FSOs). What steps are being taken to solve this problem?
During the Twelfth Plan we will assess for enforcement. Minimality is expected from the state government. Some states have already started filling the posts. Universal applications are there for food safety officers (FSOs). We are providing regulatory training to FSOs. FSOs should have the knowledge of the Act. We are working on increasing the numbers of FSOs and very soon we will be able to succeed in our aim.


What were the agendas of the Authority and CAC meeting held in July-August 2012 with respect to labs, licensing and registration, categorisation of stake holders and regulatory officers and products approvals?

The Authority conducted its Ninth Authority Meeting. At the meeting, draft standards for olive oil, draft standards for caffeinated beverages, use of nutritional ingredients in various food items, amendment to the food safety and standards (contaminants, toxins and residues) regulations, fixing of antioxidant limit in honey and draft import regulations were discussed. We cleared eight standards during our Ninth Authority Meeting. During the Tenth Authority Meeting which was recently held we have cleared ten standards for food and safety.

The last date for obtaining licenses and registrations for all food businesses across the country is February 5, 2013. What is the current status on the streamlining of the process?

Central licenses are under control. We have to step up at the state level. I would like to urge all food business operators (FBOs) to approach their relevant authorities and designated officers and apply for food safety licenses well before the deadline. They should take licenses on a urgent basis and not rush at the last moment. FBOs of all the states should go to their designated officers and obtain the licenses as soon as possible, otherwise clogging will take place.

What is the current scenario regarding uniformity in licensing and registration?

We have allowed central licensing system for three states, namely Goa, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. We are rolling out bundled software for states because issuing large number of physical licenses is a difficult process. The online licensing system was introduced to have uniformity, easy accessibility and transparency. Some states is beginning to think about it. We have done our duty. Now the preparedness is expected of the states. FSSAI is also providing the details in writing to all the states.

Although co-production will become mandatory, could you throw some light on the individual roles of the regulator and the food business operators (FBOs) with respect to ensuring that they comply with the guidelines and self-regulation?
Regulators are doing their work through a science-based approach. FBOs should take the responsibility themselves.

One of the items on the agenda was regarding the approval of blue tinted plastic containers for bulk packaging, mineral water and packaged drinking water. Are there any other F&B packaging materials awaiting approval?

Yes, the approval of blue tinted plastic containers for bulk packaging and water has been cleared. And as far as other F&B packaging materials are concerned, a call will be taken on them in the Twelfth Plan.

The time period for setting up food testing labs has now become shorter. Are you satisfied with the current scenario? Please throw some light on the complaints that labs aren't functioning properly, and the delay in sending samples for testing, as a result of which punishments are not being awarded on time?

Yes, it has become shorter. I would like to have the lab at the quickest but we don't stay in the country where our wish comes true as per our wishlist. The Twelfth Plan has got the National Development Council's (NDC) clearance 15 days ago. The average time for lab testing is five days, but there could be a delay because some foods take longer time for testing. Functional food testing takes time. Safety of the food should be established first. The public has been allowed to take samples and prove it. FSSAI has enabled every citizen to be a regulator. Now consumers can take the samples themselves and can complain to the food safety officer of their area. Yes, it is true that adulteration takes place during festivals, and the process for the punishments takes time and the reason the offenders walk freely. This festive season we are trying to make people aware about the adulteration in Delhi and what action they should take if they find adulteration. Other states will follow suit. We should congratulate the authors of the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), 2006. It is a science-based Act and won't promote Inspector Raj.

November 1, 2012 is the deadline for compliance with the Metrological Act. How is the FSSAI gearing up for that?
We have looked at that. It talks about the pack sizes. There are similar types of prohibition in other countries also. Basically the metric system is not a great conflict for us. Genetically-modified (GM) food is not allowed at all in India.

Food importers were not happy with the labelling norms? What steps have been taken to solve that problem?
The Act come into force on August 5, 2011, and the transitory period is over for them. Who is happy and who is unhappy is not our lookout, and we can't do anything about it. There is nothing irrational about labelling norms, and that is the law.

People in India are not aware about food safety, what steps have been taken by you to create awareness?

Awareness generation is the most crucial component, which needs continuous and constant efforts targeted at various stakeholders, viz. consumers, FBOs, petty food manufacturers, hawkers, etc. A lot of promotional activities need to be organised to make people aware of the essential elements of the Act, mandatory parameters in starting a food business, clarifications with respect to online and manual licensing and registration systems. The Information, Education and Communication (IEC) materials that are being developed in the Authority would be provided to each state, which could be translated in its respective language. We are giving a priority for awareness campaigns on a consistent basis. We also ran a education programme on Kalyani TV on wholesome foods and hygiene earlier, and now we are running a programme on contaminated and adulterated supplements to educate the people.

'US FDA Modernisation Act not super bus of Indian regulator': Mohanty

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) organised a meet to discuss the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), 2006 and Regulations (FSSR), 2011 in Mumbai recently.

A number of critical issues, such as the food import clearance system, the new FSSA regulations and the registration and licensing were discussed at the meeting.

S N Mohanty, chief executive officer, FSSAI, and Raghu Guda, general manager, National Institute for Smart Government (NISG), addressed the gathering, attended by about 80 delegates, comprising members of the Association of Food Scientists and Technologists (India) [AFST(I)], importers and food business operators (FBOs).

Replying to an importer's query about the US FDA Modernisation Act and the loopholes in the Indian regulations, Mohanty replied, “The US FDA Modernisation Act is not a super bus for FSSAI. We have our own regulations, and a lab report is not a certificate for safety of the import consignments. Scientific panels decide the safety of the food products and hence the final decision lies with my scientific panel teams.”

While discussing the regulations and the new Act, Mohanty emphasised that safety and security of food items should be the priority of the importers. He also requested all the importers to apply for licences and also make the transporters aware about the importance of having licences. Any person whose annual turnover is less than Rs 12 lakh should register with FSSAI, and those whose annual turnover exceeds Rs 12 lakh should obtain a licence from the nation's apex food regulator.

One of the importers, whose consignment of dietary supplements has been delayed for the last six months, questioned the uniformity of FSSAI regulations.

To this, Guda replied, “The regulations for dietary supplements are not yet out. It is a long process and we are going through it. Earlier the Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Act, 1954, was in force. It merely looked into the quality of the food and not on food safety. The new Act has made the procedure a little difficult, but then the importers should obey the regulations.”

The provisions of the new law do not explain ingredients like sucralose. But Mohanty urged consumers, FBOs and stakeholders to follow the existing Act.

Hailing the new law as ideal for food safety in the country, Mohanty said, “Our effort is also to create a single window system for an effective implementation of the new FSSA regulation.”

The importers asked for clarity in the import clearance regulations, citing the issues that crop up when the food products are held back.

“It is the duty of every importer to look into the aspect of the necessary documents for the clearance and comply with the new law,” Mohanty said, adding that it was enough to comply with the USFDA approval.

After HC order, UP to ban gutka from April 1 next year, 2013


LUCKNOW: UP government on Wednesday announced to ban gutka as per the order of the Allahabad High Court and the food security act passed by Parliament. However, the order will come into effect from April 1, 2013. Chief minister Akhilesh Yadav said that six months' time has been given to find out alternative employment for the people rendered jobless due to the ban.
In an official note issued by the state government, chief minister Akhilesh Yadav said the decision was taken in keeping with the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and was also being implemented in several other states of the country.
On September 18, the high court had questioned "the sincerity and commitment of the UP government to care for the health of its citizens" by restricting the use of 'gutka' and pan masala containing tobacco in the state.
Apart from ordering the state government to ban 'gutka', the court also asked the government to submit a compliance report, on October 10, giving details of the steps it had taken to implement the court's directives.Though the order was also applicable to other food products containing tobacco as an ingredient, the state government's order, on Wednesday, remains silent on all other products.
With as many as 13 states in the country having effected the gutka ban, the high court, in its order passed on a public interest litigation filed by Indian Dental Association, also said it might consider passing an order banning gutka, if the state government failed to act within the stipulated time.
Earlier, the standing counsel for the Central government had submitted before the court three letters sent by special secretary, Union ministry of health and family welfare, between May and August 2012, directing UP government to prohibit the sale and distribution of gutka, in keeping with the provisions of FSSA and putting restrictions on adding tobacco and nicotine to any food product. In response, the state government had, on September 10, filed an affidavit in the court saying it would take the necessary steps to ban the sale of gutka in UP within 14 days.
Though UP has been under pressure to impose a ban on the gutka, there are several reasons that have forced the state to delay the decision. One of the reasons of course is the massive revenue earnings through sales of gutka. In 2011-12 alone, the sale of gutka and tobacco-mixed paan masla in UP fetched the state government over Rs 230 crore as tax revenue.
The ban was also believed to be "under consideration'' for a long time as a populist measure - to protect the interests of several lakh labourers, traders and entrepreneurs involved in the gutka business in UP. In fact, in August, the state cabinet had lowered the entry tax on gutka.

Maggot-like insects found in Disney snack bars for toddlers produced by healthy food guru Annabel Karmel

Insects have been found in healthy snack bars for toddlers carrying Disney character names and produced by the British child food guru Annabel Karmel.
Thousands of the bars have been removed from sale following the discovery of insect larvae that look like maggots.

The products involved are Annabel Karmel chewy bars, which are sold as an alternative to junk food snacks and carry images of Mickey Mouse to appeal to youngsters.
Baby and Toddler Meal Planner
Annabel Karmel
Child food guru: Annabel Karmel's Baby and Toddler Meal Planner has sold three million copies worldwide
Mrs Karmel has built a multi-million pound food empire from her ability to tap into the difficulties that parents have in getting children to eat healthily.

Her success stems from her book the Complete Baby and Toddler Meal Planner, first published 17 years ago, which has sold more than three million copies around the world.

To date, she has written 17 books on food and child nutrition, while her business has expanded to include baby products and, more recently, ready meals.
Annabel Karmel Disney Oaty Chewy Bars
Annabel Karmel Disney Oaty Chewy Bars
Annabel Karmel Apple and Blackcurrant Oaty Chewy Bars and Annabel Karmel Apple and Raspberry Oaty Chewy Bars, both pictured, have been recalled because of food safety concerns
She has devised healthy menus in attractions such as Alton Towers, Thorpe Park, Legoland, Chessington World of Adventure, Warwick Castle and Sea Life theme parks.

While in 2010, she signed a partnership deal with Disney to launch a series of healthy snacks featuring Mickey Mouse and Winnie the Pooh.

At the time, she heralded the deal saying: ‘I'm always looking for new and exciting ways to add fun to healthier foods. So I have teamed up with some all-time favourite Disney characters to create this yummy range of wholesome snacks.’
 
The food safety recall involves Annabel Karmel Apple and Blackcurrant Oaty Chewy Bars and Annabel Karmel Apple and Raspberry Oaty Chewy Bars, which both use images of Mickey Mouse on the packs.

Details were revealed by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) which said the company ordered the recall following three complaints from customers.

An FSA spokesman said: ‘The insects are believed to be a maggot - a larvae of some sort. They have been sent for analysis to find out more.
Recall: Insect larvae have allegedly been found in Annabel Karmel's chewy bars, similar to those pictured
Recall: Insect larvae have allegedly been found in Annabel Karmel's chewy bars, similar to those pictured
‘The company received three complaints, but decided to recall the whole range, not just specific batches.

‘The source is not known. This is being investigated by the company and local authorities.’

The range is produced by Lightbody Ventures, which has contracted an outside manufacturer to produce the bars under license.

Lightbody’s managing director, Neil Stewart, said: ‘We have been made aware of a potential foreign body contamination.

‘The health and well-being of the consumers of Annabel Karmel products is an absolute priority.

‘We demand of our licensees the very highest standards of product quality and require them to implement the necessary processes and procedures to ensure that all applicable food safety standards are met.

‘Lightbody is performing an internal investigation with its supplier to effect corrective action.’
No other Annabel Karmel or Disney products are affected by the recall.

After ban, gutkha makers expose 'more harmful' fag

Issue advertisements saying ban unfair when tobacco content is higher in cigarettes manufacturers in a few states have moved court against the ban 
Piqued by the number of states opting to ban the production, sale and marketing of gutkha, a group of manufacturers under the aegis of the Smokeless Tobacco Association have issued print ads saying it is unfair to ban their products when the tobacco content in these is lower than that in cigarettes.
The ads, which appeared prominently in newspapers, say that one pouch of gutkha contains 0.2 g of tobacco as against 0.63 g in a single cigarette. The ads also blame “the powerful lobby of cigarette companies” for the ban, which has compelled a number of small gutkha manufacturers to shut shop.
Joining the Smokeless Tobacco Association in the current drive are other bodies such as the Central Arecanut and Cocoa Marketing and Processing Co-operative Ltd and the All India Kattha Factories Association. Arecanut or betelnut and kattha are the ingredients in gutkha.
Gutkha manufacturers also argue that the ban has affected arecanut growers. Industry experts concede that the consumption of the red variety of arecanut has taken a hit due to the ban on gutkha and pan masala in 14 Indian states. They point out that arecanut prices are down by about 3 per cent to Rs 134 a kg in major markets such as Karnataka and Kerala.
The states that have banned gutkha and paan masala include Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Goa, Mizoram, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattis-garh, Haryana, Punjab, Bihar, Rajasthan, Jharkhand and Sikkim.
Konkodi Padmanabha, president, Central Arecanut and Cocoa Marketing and Processing Co-operative (Campco) said the advertisements were part of the body's initiative to protect arecanut growers. “We are not batting for any tobacco product. All we are doing is highlighting which product is actually harmful. Our attempt is to improve awareness,” he said.
A spokesperson for ITC, the largest cigarette maker in the country, declined to comment. Udayan Lall, director of the Tobacco Institute of India, a New-Delhi-based body of cigarette manufacturers, also declined to comment on the issue.
However, cigarette makers questioned the rationale behind the ads. “How are we responsible for the ban? Gutkha is a food product, which is why it has been banned in 14 states,” said an executive from a cigarette company.
Manufacturers in a few states have also moved court following the ban. In Maharashtra, for instance, the Pune-based Dhariwal Group, which makes Manikchand gutka, challenged the ban recently. Company officials, while choosing not to come on record, say that pan masala and gutkha cannot be considered as food products. That way, they say, these products will not be governed by the Food Safety & Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
Maharashtra had issued the ban on gutkha and paan masala this July under the Food Safety & Standards Act of 2006, on the grounds that these products, when consumed, were injurious to health. The notification issued by the state had said that paan masala contained chemicals such as magnesium carbonate, while gutkha contained chemicals such as zinc, among others. These chemicals are said to cause cancer. Following the ban in Delhi and other states, brokerages such as Edelweiss and Anand Rathi had issued reports saying that the move was positive for cigarette makers since consumers of gutkha would shift to cigarettes.
“We expect low-end cigarette brands such as Bristol, Flake and Scissors from ITC and Charminar from VST to benefit. Also, we estimate the new cigarette of 64mm (from ITC) to command higher volumes, finding favour with former gutkha consumers,” said Anand Rathi.

FDA notice to radio channel for 'misleading' ad

NAGPUR: The city branch of Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has sent a notice to a radio channel saying that an advertisement aired by them violated the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA). The advertisement for a brand of vegetable oil claimed that the product reduced the cholesterol levels of the consumer which the authorities say is a misleading statement.
The provisions of the Act enable the FDA to act against any manufacturer making tall claims about products. The said notice has asked the advertisers to provide copies of the agreement and communication between the channel and the manufacturer to establish who is at fault. "The advertisement is under Section 24 of the Act that prevents misleading information being relayed through media. This is not the first notice we have sent to a media house. At least six have been sent so far," said Sanjay Naragude, assistant commissioner (food).
 Though enacted in 2006, the Act has been implemented since 2011. This Act has been opposed by manufacturers and traders. Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Act 1955 that preceded it, surveillance was not very strong, say the authorities. Officials of the channel said the claims have not been made by them and they only relayed the information provided to them by the manufacturers.

Sumul dairy to take on local milk suppliers


SURAT: Surat District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limited (SUMUL) has become the first dairy in the country to launch high fat pasteurized milk.
The dairy launched the milk under the brand name 'Sumulya' on October 2. Sumul aims to capture the market share of consumers buying loose milk in order to get more fat in the preparation of a range of homemade sweet dishes, ghee, buttermilk and butter.
Officials said the high fat pasteurized milk launched by Sumul is available for Rs 50 per litre and has a fat percentage of 7 per cent and the Solid Not Fat (SNF) of 9 per cent.
Marketing manager of Sumul Manish Bhatt told TOI, "This is the only high fat milk brand in the country. We have been selling about 10,000 liters of high fat milk per day in the city and it is expected to double in the next few days."
In a recent study conducted by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) in Gujarat, about 89 per cent of the state's milk samples were not conforming to standards. The highest number of
non-conforming milk samples that were collected from urban areas in India as from Gujarat cities.
For instance in Gujarat, 75 of the 89 milk samples that were collected from cities were found lacking the desired Solid Not Fat (SNF) and fat content. This was due to the dilution of milk with water and other adulterants which could be neutralizers, hydrogen peroxide, sugar, starch, urea, salt, detergent, formalin and vegetable salt.
"The loose milk is not good for human health as it lacks SNF. SNF is one of the most essential components of milk that consists of vitamins, minerals and nutritional components. The price of the milk is based on its SNF and fat contents," Bhatt said.

Self regulation an effective measure to regulate misleading ads:CII report

"Constitution of legislation, in form of an Administrative Authority to curb misleading ads is not the solution," writes a white paper presented by Confederation of Indian Industries(CII) National Committee on Marketing.
Titled "Self regulation in advertising in India – a critical evaluation" suggest that the co-regulation between ASCI and regulators like Department of Consumers Affair(DCA), Food Safety & Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, etc, is an effective solution to control the misleading ads in India.
The paper embarks on partnering and strengthening, the current mechanism of self-regulation through ASCI which is a productive system for consumers, industry and the government.
The paper also recommends that in cases of non-compliance of the Consumer Complaints Council’s (CCC) decisions the matter should be referred to the parent regulatory body for further actions.
However the paper is a product after the DCA of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution had made a proposal for the intervention of the government to control misleading ads. However CII has requested the DCZ to consider its proposal and the constitution of an administrative authority will only delay the process of consumer redress and be counter-productive.