Jul 1, 2018

Trouble in Paradise

India’s food safety regulator is getting stricter about who gets to retail food labeled organic. Small farmers are upset
Sujatha Rajeswaran made the kind of career shift those stuck in the corporate rat race tend to wistfully talk about, around the office water cooler. Eight years ago, she and her husband quit their IT jobs in Chennai and began farming on a three-acre plot near Puducherry, where they grow paddy, millets, pulses and sesame free of chemicals and pesticides. The switch meant losing a steady monthly income but Rajeswaran says they enjoy other luxuries, such as eating fruit plucked fresh from the garden. Some of the crops they grow, such as traditional varieties of rice, are sold directly to customers, while others are sold to a few retail outlets in Puducherry.
By the time you read this, though, Rajeswaran would no longer be able to sell her produce to retail stores under the organic label. A new rule framed by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), which kicks in on July 1, bans the retail sale of food labelled as organic unless it has been certified according to one of two processes. “I don’t know what will happen,” says Rajeswaran, who chose to sell by building trust with the stores over getting her products certified.
So far, certification was compulsory only for export. Farmers who wanted to export organic produce had to opt for third-party certification by one of 28 agencies recognised under the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) guidelines. Those selling at home could either get NPOP certification or choose the cheaper Participatory Guarantee System-India (PGS), under which farmers form a collective and vouch for the others’ produce. But neither was compulsory for domestic sales.
“It was a free-for-all situation where anyone could call anything organic and get away with it,” says FSSAI CEO Pawan Kumar Agarwal. “We are trying to create a clearer system.” The new rule will empower food safety officers to test samples from the market and prosecute transgressors.
A 2016 Yes Bank white paper on the organic market in India estimates the organised market to be ₹250-300 crore and the “uncertified, unmonitored” one to be ₹300-500 crore. On an average, organic produce sells at a 30% premium. At online retailer Big Basket, for example, a kilo of organic carrot costs ₹100 while local carrot is ₹80.

But small farmers argue the two certification options are either expensive, cumbersome or both and doesn’t always guarantee quality. The samples in a 2014 study by the Indian Agricultural Research Institute had found pesticide residues above permissible levels, though the samples had been certified by third-party agencies. Erode-based Ramaswamy Selvam, who started organic farming in 1996, says certification under NPOP would cost him ₹15,000-₹50,000, while the PGS system is cumbersome and time-consuming. For example, the fee structure of Bureau Veritas, an NPOP-recognised agency, includes ₹15,000 per man day for organic certification for one farmer, ₹7,000 as certificate fees and ₹2,000 for a transaction certificate, apart from expenses for lab analysis, travel and accommodation. A certification is typically valid for three years and renewals cost less.
Under PGS, which is supposed to be free, a farmer has to form a collective with at least four other organic farmers. “We would have to visit the others’ farms twice in one cropping season, which is not easy if the farms are not nearby. I see the new rules as a kind of punishment to me for having turned organic,” says Selvam, who has circulated an online petition demanding the rules be withdrawn.
Vishalakshi Padmanabhan, founder of farmer collective Buffalo Back, says they are trying to help the 35% of their farmers who have not yet been certified under the procedure. “But it is not easy.” Others, like NCR-based iOrganic, which sells 3,000 litres of milk a day, have been able to sidestep the rule by having organic only in the brand name. “We have not called our milk organic anywhere, we only say it is farm-fresh,” says founder Aditya Sinhal.
Kavitha Kuruganti, a former member of the government task force on organic and non-chemical farming, warns that the new rules will keep a whole set of farmers out of the organic market. “It will become an elite market dominated by big brands serving wealthy customers.”
FSSAI’s Agarwal argues that a clause exempts a “small original producer or producer organisation” directly selling to the consumer from certification. But Selvam asks why the exception for direct sales should be restricted to “small farmers”, a term that has not even been clearly defined.
For now, the non-certified farmers are hopeful of getting some leeway and the FSSAI says it is willing to listen. For starters, a small farmer is likely to be defined as one earning less than ₹12 lakh annually. “We might also extend the July 1 deadline. The regulations are final but in the course of implementation, if we face any difficulty, we are open to renewing these,” adds Agarwal.
Dairy firm iOrganics says the FSSAI rule does not affect it as it does not say its milk is organic, only farm fresh

MENACE OF FOOD ADULTERATION

India's consumer-driven economy has unleashed a large number of brands in the country. These brands meet top quality standards and requirements that are laid out by national food regulator, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). Normally, such brands carry a higher price as they have to deliver on multiple benchmarks. However, this has also provided an opportunity for many unscrupulous players to either produce cheap products or indulge in counterfeiting. Such is the greed for money that those indulging in food adulteration knowingly refuse to see its unabashed disregard for human life. What makes this problem even more complicated is the fact that there are a host of cheap, easily available and life-threatening options at the disposal of the adulterators that frankly it's difficult to pinpoint the most effective strategy in this situation. It’s indeed a hydra-headed monster that we are dealing with.
Economically, adulteration cuts production costs and boosts profit margins, but from the health and safety perspective, it plays a deadly game with all those it comes in contact with. The travesty of justice is evident from the fact that no matter what the health damage, people literally go scot free under the present law. While there is a provision for life imprisonment for adulteration, the police don't have the power to invoke the FSSAI act; this can only be invoked by the food safety authorities in the States. The net result is that most cases receive a maximum imprisonment of six months or a fine of `1000. The FSSAI, which is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through regulation and supervision of food safety has collected a total of 84,537 adulterated food samples from all States in 2014-15, 77,941 in 2015-16 and 80,463 in 2016-17. However, the convictions stood at only 1,402 in 2014-15, 540 in 2015-16 and 1,591 in 2016-17. To my mind, this rate has to simply skyrocket in times ahead and this could be a vital part in dealing with the complex maze of adulteration.
Commonly adulterated items in India include milk, pulses, rice, local sweets, vegetable oils and ghee, honey, liquor, medicine and so on. According to the National Survey on Milk Adulteration 2011, in States like Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Mizoram, adulteration of milk was up to a 100 per cent with the national average at 68.4 per cent. The adulterants of choice were found to be urea and detergent.
Pulses are consumed by a large number of people. This makes profit easy to come by and adulterants like asbestos (polishing), metanil yellow (colour) and soluble coal tar (shine) are added. These are all carcinogenic and compromise consumers’ health. Rice, which is a staple food in India, has become a favourite with the adulterators, who till recently, were adding marble chips, mixing sand, chalk and brick powder, and have also started a synthetic replication of rice called ‘plastic rice'. Experts warn that this form raises the risk of cancer by 15-20 per cent and damages the digestive and reproductive system.
Local sweets are a rage in all parts of the country. However, sulphur dioxide in excessive amounts, starch, aluminium and more are added to save cost and enhance the visual appeal. These can cause severe allergies and in worst cases, fatality.Vegetables oils and ghee are necessities that are exploited by the adulterators. In mustard oil, argemone seeds and papaya seeds, which are used to add bulk and weight, can cause epidemic dropsy and severe glaucoma. People have lost their eyesight by consuming sub-standard edible oil. The young, old and those with immunity issues are particularly vulnerable.
Recently, an article in a newspaper in the month of April, 2018, carried a report about a fake ghee factory that was busted in Uttar Pradesh. It contained packets of prominent dairy brands like Amul, Paras, Sanskar and Madhav. It was found that they were using a combination of dalda (vegetable ghee), refined oil and essences to make desi ghee. Officials say that this combination was like poison and played havoc with the lives of the people.These were sold at a cheaper price and nexus with local wholesale traders ensured its penetration in the markets.
Honey, which is known for its overall health benefits is being denatured with the addition of corn syrup, which is imported from China and invert sugar which is locally available. The net result of all this, according to the experts, is that 85 per cent of the honey sold in India, is adulterated. I have limited my scope to the very basic and essential items sold across the length and breadth of our country. The situation is no better in spices, ice creams, liquor, medicines and bottled water.
Last year, understanding the gravity of the situation, the law commission had recommended a set of stringent measures.It recommended that sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code be amended to make adulteration a serious crime. The commission also recommended increasing the fine on adulterators from `1000 to `10 lakh and increasing jail time from six months to imprisonment till death.To their credit, States like Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Odisha have already implemented the second point. However, a lot more needs to be done and more States have to follow suit if we are to effectively tackle the menace of food adulteration.
The Government needs to intensify its efforts in creating large scale awareness campaigns that educate the consumers about the ill-effects of buying counterfeit products and the consumers on their part need to be aware that a small saving that is made by purchasing counterfeits can have life-threatening results. The need of the hour is to set up systems for regularly monitoring through a large number of accredited laboratories across the country. These will check, verify and satisfy that the products available in the marketplace are meeting the quality and safety standards and that they are indeed genuine. Such a mechanism should be on a fast track basis so that examples are made out of such unscrupulous elements and they never muster the courage to break the law again.
(The writer is Chairman, FICCI-CASCADE and Sr. Vice President, ITC Ltd )

Display of food safety boards a must

Chandigarh: The state government has instructed the district authorities to ensure that food safety display boards are installed at places where food business operators ply their trade. A spokesperson said under the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011, it was mandatory to display a copy of the licence at a prominent place at all times on the premises used by the operators concerned. 

தேங்காய் எண்ணெய்யில் கலப்படம் செய்த 51 நிறுவனங்களுக்கு சீல்!

கொச்சின்: 51 நிறுவனங்கள் கலப்படத்தில் ஈடுபட்டதால், உணவு பாதுகாப்புத் துறைஅதிகாரிகள் சீல் வைத்து நடவடிக்கை எடுத்துள்ளனர். 
கேரள மாநிலத்தில் அதிக தென்னை மரங்கள் காணப்படுகின்றன. இதனால் தேங்காய் விளைச்சல் அதிகம். எனவே அம்மாநில மக்கள் சமையலுக்கு தேங்காய் எண்ணெய் பயன்படுத்தி வருகின்றனர். 
ரீபைண்ட் எண்ணெய்யில் உடல் நலத்திற்கு தீங்கு விளைவிக்கும் வேதிப் பொருட்கள் இருக்கின்றன. எனவே இதனை பெரும்பாலானோர் பயன்படுத்துவதில்லை. தேங்காயில் எண்ணெய்யில் இருக்கும் கொழுப்பு, நல்ல கொழுப்பு ஆகும். 
இந்நிலையில் ரீபைண்ட் எண்ணெய் பயன்படுத்துவோரும், தற்போது தேங்காய் எண்ணெய் பயன்பாட்டிற்கு மாறியுள்ளனர். இதனால் எண்ணெய் வியாபாரம் நிறுவனங்கள் நல்ல லாபம் ஈட்டி வருகின்றன.
ங்கிருந்து பல்வேறு மாநிலங்களுக்கும் தேங்காய் எண்ணெய் ஏற்றுமதி செய்யப்படுகிறது. இந்த சூழலில் தேங்காய் எண்ணெய்யில் கலப்படம் செய்யப்படுவதாக உணவு பாதுகாப்புத் துறைக்கு புகார்கள் வந்தன. 
இதையடுத்து பாலக்காடு, கோழிக்கோடு, கொச்சி உள்ளிட்ட இடங்களில் செயல்பட்டு வரும் நிறுவனங்களில் ஆய்வு மேற்கொள்ளப்பட்டது. அதில் 51 நிறுவனங்கள் சிக்கின. இவற்றிற்கு உணவு பாதுகாப்புத் துறை அதிகாரிகள் சீல் வைத்து நடவடிக்கை மேற்கொண்டனர்.

DINAMALAR NEWS


DINAMALAR NEWS


Raid in Store