Feb 6, 2014

Government takes on food contamination with plans for 'product recall' safeguard

Shaken with the rising incidents of adulteration of food products manufactured in India and sold locally and abroad, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) - under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare - is all set to usher in a 'product recall' procedure to ensure food safety in the country. 
Once the procedure is in place, any food product, ranging from tinned products to packaged milk, if found to be counterfeit, adulterated or contaminated, can be seized and recalled at the production stage, retail stores or even from consumers.
If a product is found to be spurious, the entire quantity of the item produced in the 'production batch' period will be recalled. It could be thousands of butter packets belonging to the specific period in question, or lakhs of baby food packets. 
It would also be possible to trace and remove a tainted product at any part of the supply chain. 
In November last year, Tasty Nuts, a variety of spice-coated fried peanuts, from Haldiram's Nagpur plant were recalled in Australia as the product was found to be contaminated with aflatoxin, a highly toxic compound. The product was recalled from retailers and even consumers. 
Warning
In January this year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued 11 warning letters to food manufacturers and processors, including Gadre Marine Export of India, for violations of packaging norms. 
Similarly, the FSSAI is in the process of issuing draft regulations on food recall procedures so that stocks belonging to a specific batch can be completely pulled off the shelves. 
Taking a cue from such incidents, in a meeting held last week, the FSSAI has passed the product recall procedure and will soon forward it to the Law Ministry for further action. 
"We had a meeting with the representatives from food industries, GS1 India (a nonprofit organisation). We discussed the feasibility of executing the product-recall procedure. We will soon forward it to the Law Ministry for further implementation," FSSAI chairperson K. Chandramouli told Mail Today.
Fssai has entrusted the job of tracing counterfeit or tainted packaged products to GS1 India. GS1 is an NGO facilitating collaboration among traders, in order to solve together business challenges that leverage standards and to ensure safety, efficiency and visibility along the entire value chain.
"We get regular complaints regarding counterfeit drugs and food products. We have been able to curtail the sales of counterfeit drugs in past few years, now we are looking at food products. Product recall is uncommon in India, while it is widely practised in other countries," he said. 
The Right to Food Act was signed into law on September 12, 2013 to cover approximately two thirds of India's 1.2 billion people. Thereafter, in October, the Supreme Court directed that the right to life guaranteed under the country's Constitution also includes the right to safe food.
Several incidents of adulterated food distribution have come to light in the last couple of months that have thrown up a huge challenge to the authorities. 
Recall
The industry-driven work of GS1 has led to a standard, which identifies the key principles of traceability and demonstrates how to apply them for effective product recall. This standard is applicable to companies in all industries using GS1 standards, and can be used by companies of all sizes.
The procedure when put in place, will act as a major deterrent to the proliferation of counterfeit products.
"Once the law ministry approves the procedure, the state governments would be directed to implement it," said Chandramouli.
Holograms to fight fakes
Industry bodies are banking on advanced technology to combat the menace of counterfeit products. The fake goods market in India has grown by over 10,000 per cent over the last two decades. 
According to a FICCI report, around 27 products have fake versions in the market ranging from drugs, food items, cosmetics, packaged goods, software and cigarettes. Industry bodies like the Hologram Manufacturers Association of India (HOMAI) are working on new generation anti-counterfeiting solutions to help pharma companies in combating the fake medicines problem. 
The HOMAI member companies are banking on sophisticated holography technology which provides three layers of security.
Pradip Shroff, former president of HOMAI, said: "The fact is that security holograms work as an authentication partner to drug companies. No other competing technology works on so many levels like overt (visible with naked eyes), covert (nonvisible or machine readable) and forensic security which hologram provides." 
Centre and state spar over toxic food
The Centre and Delhi government are busy playing ping-pong when it comes to providing healthy food to people. 
Faced with the question of who should ensure that banned pesticides do not get into the food system, the Central and Delhi governments on Wednesday blamed each other in the Delhi High Court. 
The court hearing began with the amicus curiae, senior advocate Sanjay Jain, who has been asked to assist the court as an independent person, making it clear that the governments were simply trying to "turn ostrich to the harsh realities". 
He said the studies conducted by the Central and Delhi governments, claiming there was no pesticide or chemical residue on fruits and vegetables in Delhi's markets, were futile since the samples were very small and they were tested for the presence of only a few pesticides. 

Amicus curiae, advocate Sanjay Jain, said both Centre and state were failing to address the issue of banned pesticides in fruits and vegetables
"The Union of India and NCT of Delhi in their responses have failed to address the larger issues and only concentrated on testing samples of a few fruits and vegetables to find or rule out traces of only a few pesticides, completely oblivious to the fact that a few test reports on inadequate sample size, not representative in character, cannot address the problem which is of enormous proportions," Jain said. 
Lawyers of both the Centre and state rushed to counter Jain. Delhi government's counsel claimed no banned or restricted pesticides had been found in any of the several samples of fruits and vegetables it had tested, whereas the Centre's counsel argued maintaining of food standards in Delhi was the exclusive duty of the city government.
Unimpressed, the court reminded them that the moot issue related to people's health.

Are the vegetables you eat laced with pesticide?

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday expressed concern over a report that said pesticide residues were found to be ‘beyond permissible limits’ in vegetables and edible items sold across the country.
A division bench of Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, taking note of a report filed by amicus curiae Sanjay Jain, issued notice to the central and city governments on the issue.
It sought response from the department of agriculture and cooperation, department of agriculture research and education, department of chemicals and petrochemicals, department of biotechnology, ministry of environment and forests, food safety and standards authority, and department of food safety.
The court will hear the case on March 5.
It said high content of pesticides in vegetables and fruits required a ‘pan-India’ concerted effort.
Jain submitted a report and said pesticides are used in a ‘growing number of vegetables which have the potential to cause serious neurological problem, kidney damage, skin diseases, cancer and other diseases’. (Read: ‘Test packaged food for pesticides’ says CSE)
Going through the report, the court said: ‘India is not a country to allow such type of chemicals to be used in vegetables and fruits. The central government has to make the effort. It has to be pan-India effort.’
Jain told the bench that the issue required efforts from all stakeholders, including various government departments.
Appearing for the Delhi government, advocate Zubeda Begum told the court that the Delhi Agriculture Marketing Board found ‘no pesticides residues beyond permissible limit’ on 1,134 samples reviewed in a year, from January 2013 to January 2014.
The samples collected and tested by the government were very small and did not reflect the actual ground figures, said the amicus curiae, who was assisting the court in the matter.
He further said there was no effective public campaign to educate the farmers, despite the fact that ignorance of farmers was the fountainhead of the pesticide problem. (Read: Pesticides could be harming your unborn child)
The high court had earlier taken suo motu cognizance on an NGO report that said the amount of pesticides used by farmers in India was as much as 750 times higher than European standards.
Harmful effects of pesticide
Dr Rashmi Sanghi, who has done a lot of research in this field, found that the pesticide levels in breast milk samples were 400-800% higher than allowed levels. The show then visited a district in Kerala called Kasargod which had been sprayed with 22 lakh tonnes of endosulphan between 1976 and 2000.
Dr Mohan Kumar recounted his tale of working in Kasargod. He noticed that an abnormally large number of people suffered from chronic illnesses from a long time. He said that about 5000 people must have been affected. Children suffered from grievous malformations, cancers, deformities, etc. He said that since the spraying stopped the number of cases have gone down.
The show then visited various areas in the country to show how rampant the use of pesticides. Farmers actually refused to eat their own yields and would grow separate crops for themselves.
Kavitha Kurugganti of the Alliance for Sustainable Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) said that the blame didn’t lie with farmers alone but the policy-makers. She said that 67 pesticides that were banned in other countries that were still used in India. She said that the pesticides sprayed only 1% reaches its intended target and the rest 99% remains the environment.
Dr S G Kabra pointed out that pesticides caused the destruction of folic acid especially during pregnancy leads to stunted growth, mental diseases, etc. in unborn children.
The talk then turned to the Green Revolution. Would the revolution have been possible without pesticides? Dr Vandana Shiva believed that the because of the pesticides, India has to import more crops because they ruin the symbiotic relationship between the soil and plants.

New deadline for grub hubs

A roadside vendor in Bistupur on Wednesday. 

Eateries in Jharkhand just got six-month breathing time. 
For, the Centre has extended the nationwide deadline for licence/registration under the Food Safety and Standards Act (2006) till August 4. 
This has spelt relief for Singhbhum Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCI), the state’s largest trade outfit, that has heartily welcomed the decision. 
“We are happy that the Union ministry of health and family welfare has extended the deadline from February 4 to August 4. This will provide adequate time for food businesses to organise things,” said Bharat Vasani, vice-president (trade and commerce) of SCCI. 
Sources said Sanjay Gupta, assistant director (enforcement) of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India under the Union ministry of health and family welfare, issued a notification in this regard on Tuesday. 
The extension was given keeping in mind the demand of the Confederation of All India Traders (Cait). 
A delegation of Cait had met Union health minister Ghulam Nabi Azad in the last week of January, requesting him to extend the deadline for at least a year. 
They had also asked Azad to constitute a joint committee comprising senior government officers and traders who would study the act and, consequently, recommend necessary amendments to make compliance easier. 
SCCI president Suresh Sonthalia said Cait general secretary Praveen Khandelwal would visit Jamshedpur on February 11. “We will discuss the act and start pursuing members to procure licence or registration,” he said.

REPORT ON LICENSING & REGISTRATION IN STATIONS/UTs


சங்க செயலாளர் கேள்வி அரசு உத்தரவை செயல்படுத்தும் உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்கள் மீது வணிகர்கள் குறை கூறுவது ஏன்?

நாகை, பிப். 6:
தமிழ்நாடு உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர் சங்க மாநில செயலாளர் அன்பழகன் வெளியிட்டுள்ள அறிக்கையில் கூறி இருப்பதாவது: 
சமீப காலமாக வணிகர் சங்கங்களின் சார்பில் உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தர நிர்ணய சட்டம் தொடர்பாக வெளிவரும் செய்திகளில் தமிழகத்தில் பணியாற்றி வரும் உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்கள் அனைவரையும் விரோதிகளாக சித்தரிக்கும்போக்கு கையாளப்பட்டு வருகிறது. 
உணவு வணிகம் செய்வோர் உரிமம் மற்றும் பதிவுச்சான்று பெற வருகிற 4ந்தேதி கடைசி நாள் என இந்திய உணவு பாதுகாப்பு தர நிர்ணய ஆணையம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. 
இது குறித்து தமிழ்நாடு உணவு பாதுகாப்புத்துறை உயர் அலுவலர்கள், உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்களுக்கு தெரிவித்துள்ளனர். இத்தகவலை உணவு வணிகத்தில் ஈடுபட்டிருப் போரிடம் கொண்டு சேர்க்க வேண்டியது உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்களின் வேலையாகும். 
உணவு வணிக நிறுவனங்களின் உரிமம், பதிவு தொடர்பாக, அரசு உத்தரவின்றி சுயமாக எதையும் செயல்படுத்த உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்களுக்கு அதிகாரம் இல்லை. உண்மை அவ்வாறு இருக்கும்போது உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்கள் தனி ராஜ்ஜியம் நடத்துவதாக கூறுவதும், உரிமம் தொடர்பான தொகையை அரசு கருவூலத்தில் செலுத்தி, இணையதளம் வழியாக மட்டுமே விண்ணப்பிக்க முடியும் என்ற நிலையில் உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்கள் அரசு நிர்ணயித்த கட்டணத்தை விட அதிகமாக வசூலிப்பதாக கூறுவதும் மன வருத்தத்தை அளிப்பதாக உள்ளது. 
தவறு செய்பவர்கள் யாராக இருந்தாலும் அவர்கள் மீது உரிய சட்டப்பூர்வ நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பதை வரவேற்கிற அதே நேரத்தில் அனைத்து உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அலுவலர்கள் மீதும் சேற்றை வாரி இறைக்க வேண்டாம். இவ்வாறு அன்பழகன் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.

Delhi HC Concerned over Pesticides in Vegetables

The Delhi High Court Wednesday expressed concern over a report that said pesticide residues were found to be "beyond permissible limits" in vegetables and edible items sold across the country.
A division bench of Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, taking note of a report filed by amicus curiae Sanjay Jain, issued notice to the central and city governments on the issue.
It sought response from the department of agriculture and cooperation, department of agriculture research and education, department of chemicals and petrochemicals, department of biotechnology, ministry of environment and forests, food safety and standards authority, and department of food safety.
The court will hear the case March 5.
It said high content of pesticides in vegetables and fruits required a "pan-India" concerted effort.
Jain submitted a report and said pesticides are used in a "growing number of vegetables which have the potential to cause serious neurological problem, kidney damage, skin diseases, cancer and other diseases".
Going through the report, the court said: "India is not a country to allow such type of chemicals to be used in vegetables and fruits. The central government has to make the effort. It has to be pan-India effort."
Jain told the bench that the issue required efforts from all stakeholders, including various government departments.
Appearing for the Delhi government, advocate Zubeda Begum told the court that the Delhi Agriculture Marketing Board found "no pesticides residues beyond permissible limit" on 1,134 samples reviewed in a year, from January 2013 to January 2014.
The samples collected and tested by the government were very small and did not reflect the actual ground figures, said the amicus curiae, who was assisting the court in the matter.
He further said there was no effective public campaign to educate the farmers, despite the fact that ignorance of farmers was the fountainhead of the pesticide problem.
The high court had earlier taken suo motu cognizance on an NGO report that said the amount of pesticides used by farmers in India was as much as 750 times higher than European standards.

Delhi govt passing the buck on food safety, says lawyer

The court, which has been monitoring the issue since 2010, has asked various ministries and departments to submit their responses by March.
Slamming reports filed by Delhi government’s Department of Food Safety that there is no pesticide or chemical residue in fruits and vegetables in the Capital’s markets, a senior lawyer appointed as amicus curiae in a PIL Wednesday told the Delhi High Court that “no results” have been achieved despite 12 affidavits being filed by the Centre and Delhi government since 2010.
“The attempts have been to pass the buck,” said the report filed by senior advocate Sanjay Jain, who said there is no coordination between various government departments. The court has now issued notice to the central ministries of agriculture, chemicals and petrochemicals, science and technology, environment, health and family welfare, as well as the department of food safety to respond to the report. “Delhi does not grow anything, everything comes from outside. There has to be coordination,” said the court.
Delhi government had filed an affidavit claiming it tested 59 samples from wholesale and retail markets between August 2013 and January 2014, but did not find pesticide residue or coloring matter in them. But Jain said the sample size was too small. The court also observed that “pan India action” is required to “educate farmers”. During arguments, advocate Sugriva Dubey, who filed the PIL, said, “Distributors inject fruits and vegetables with chemicals to speed up the ripening process and give color. Nothing is being done about that,” said Dubey. The court, which has been monitoring the issue since 2010, has asked various ministries and departments to submit their responses by March.

CAIT, Chamber demands joint committee to analyse Food Safety and Standards Act

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry has demanded the government to constitute a joint committee of officials and trade leaders, to make an in-depth study of the Food Safety and Standards Act and recommend necessary changes in it. The Chamber hasbeen making efforts with the CAIT to get the Act deferred, and also to review its strict provisions, which are harsh for the trading community.
The Act, in the present shape is applicable not only on traders, but also has wider implications on common man, as wherever the food items are served for profit or non-profit motives in restaurants, eating joints, religious places, wedding ceremonies, social functions, seminars, meetings and social services like midday meals, the government would be under the purview of the Act.
The continuation of food trade without registration would attract a fine of `5 lakh and imprisonment of 6 months.
Even the entrepreneurs/people involved in processing, packing, storage, transportation, distribution of food items would be liable to comply the provisions of the Act.
Chamber of Commerce & Industry president YV Sharma thanked the CIET, especially general secretary Parveen Khandwal, who undertook a massive exercise and finally succeeded in persuading the government of India, especially the union health and family welfare minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, to postpone the implementation of the said Act for at least 6 months and appoint a committee to review and recommend the amendments in the provisions of the said Act.
The government has issued notification no. 1/1/Enf-1/FSSAI/2012 dated February4,2014, extending the time line for seeking registration / conversion / renewal of existing licenses up to August4,2014.

CCI wants Food Safety and Standard Act deferred

Jammu, Feb. 05: Chamber had been making efforts with Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) to get the Food Safety and Standards Act deferred and also to review the draconian provisions of the said act, which are harsh for the trading community. The CAIT and the Chamber has demanded the government to constitute a joint committee of the officials and the trade leaders to make an in-depth study of the act to recommend the government necessary changes in the said act. The Food Safety and standard Act in the present shape is applicable not only on the traders but has also wider implications even on common man as wherever the food items are served for profit or non-profit motive like Restaurants, Food Places, Religious places, wedding ceremonies, social functions, seminars, meetings and social services like Midday meals etc of the government will be under the purview of the Act. The continuation of Food trade without registration will attract a fine of Rs. 5 lakhs and imprisonment of 6 months. 
Even the entrepreneurs / persons involved in processing, packing, storage, transportation, distribution etc of the food items will be liable to comply the provisions of the Act. 
Sh. Y.V. Sharma, President Chamber of Commerce & Industry expresses thanks to the Confederation of All India Traders especially Mr. Parveen Khandwal, Secretary General who undertook a massive exercise and finally succeeded in persuading Government of India especially the Hon’ble Union Health and Family Welfare Minister Sh. Ghulam Nabi Azad to postpone the implementation of the said act for atleast 6 months and appoint a select committee to review and recommend the amendments in the provisions of the said act. Ultimately the government has issued Notification No. 1/1/Enf-1/FSSAI/2012 dated 4th February 2014 extending the time line for seeking registration / conversion / renewal of existing licenses upto 4th August 2014.

Food safety license deadline extended

COIMBATORE: In a major relief to food business operators, the deadline for getting registered with the food safety department has been extended till August 4, 2014. The decision was taken in New Delhi on the basis of a petition from Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) demanding an extension, claiming that it would be a major relief for six crore traders across the country. Though there were reports coming in on Tuesday evening about further extension of the deadline, it was officially confirmed on Wednesday. 
"We have received instruction about the six month extension till August. As of now, there will be no further changes in other procedures and we will continue to seek applications online, carry out the necessary formalities for registration and issue licenses," said R Kathiravan, designated officer, food safety department, Coimbatore. 
This is the third extension given to traders to comply with the norms of the Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Business) Regulation 2011. The traders' associations have been claiming that the act is extremely stringent and impractical to follow, especially for domestic food producers. 
"The norms of this regulation cannot be practically implemented. Besides, it will wipe out the entire small and medium scale food business operators. The fact that even outlets like provision stores, grocery stores and bakeries are included in its scope itself is not at all logical," claimed VC Natarajan, district secretary, Federation of Tamil Nadu Traders Association. 
As on February 4, 2906 food business operators had got their license from the food safety department and another 6905 got registered as per the norm. In total, there are 22,000 food business operators in Coimbatore district. According to officials, they were facing maximum resistance from small and medium scale food business operators. 
"As per the law, grocery stores are also supposed to get registered with the department. There are different parameters to analyse and confirm whether products like rice, pulses and cereals sold through these outlets could be certified as safe for consumption," said an official from the food safety department. 

Food safety licence: confusion over extension of deadline

The FSSAI’s order extends the earlier deadline for conversions/renewals of existing licences/registrations and not for new applications 
Roadside eateries, canteens and other small food outlets comprise a majority of the 12,000 food business operators in Coimbatore district who are yet to obtain licences/registrations under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India’s (FSSAI) order issued on Tuesday extending the deadline for food business operators to comply with Food Safety Act was said to be causing confusion among enforcement officials and business establishments.
Order
The order extended the earlier deadline of February 4 to August 4 for conversions/renewals of existing licences/registrations obtained under the earlier legislations such as Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. It does not include applications for fresh licences. The deadline for fresh licences/registrations was February 4.
A Food Safety Wing Official told The Hindu here on Wednesday that there was confusion over this order as it would not be applicable for the 12,000-odd food business operators in Coimbatore who were operating without licences or registrations.
Extension
The earlier extension order issued by FSSAI on February 5, 2013, clearly stated that the deadline had been extended by a year for those seeking conversions/renewals of existing licences, as well as for those operating without licences. With reference to the new extension, the official said that a large number of local traders and food business operators have refused to accept this difference and have appealed to the authorities not to enforce this norm.
The Food Safety Act had replaced eight legislations that covered various food products ranging from milk to meat and made it mandatory for all food businesses, from pushcarts to restaurants, to get licences/registrations. It had provisions for stringent legal action, including imprisonment, for firms violating this norm.
Officials said that they cannot begin enforcing this Central legislation without orders from the Tamil Nadu Food Safety Commissioner. As of now, orders have not yet been issued.
When the Act was notified and implemented from August 5, 2011, businesses were given an initial deadline of a year to register. It was extended from August 4, 2012, to February 4, 2013, and again to February 4 this year. This has been further extended by another six months.
A senior official said: “What the food traders do not realise is that they were all covered under this Act regardless of whether they have got registrations/licences. Their products would have to conform to FSSAI standards, failing which they would face legal consequences.”

உணவுபாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தரநிர்ணய சட்டத்தின் கீழ் சாலையோர உணவகங்களை பதிவு செய்ய உத்தரவு சென்னையில் பணி தொடக்கம்

சென்னை, பிப்.6-உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தர நிர்ணயசட்டத்தின் கீழ் சாலையோர உணவகங்கள் முறையாக பதிவு செய்து கொள்ள வேண்டும். இந்தப்பணி சென்னையில் தொடங்கப்பட்டு உள்ளது என்று உணவு பாதுகாப்பு துறை அதிகாரி கூறினர்.உணவு பாதுகாப்பு சட்டம்அனைத்து உணவகங்கள் மற்றும் சாலையோர உணவகங்களில் உரிமம் பெறுவது மற்றும் பதிவு செய்யும் பணியை உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் மருந்து நிர்வாகத்துறை தொடங்கி உள்ளது.இதற்காக சென்னை அண்ணாநகரில் சாலையோரங்களில் உள்ள உணவகங்கள், டீக்கடைகள், ஜூஸ் கடைகள், காய்கறி மற்றும் பழ வியாபாரிகள் அனைவரையும் உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தரநிர்ணய சட்டத்தின் கீழ் கொண்டுவருவதற்காக அதிகாரிகள் நேற்று நேரடியாக இந்த கடைகளுக்கு சென்று விழிப்புணர்வு அளித்தனர்.
6 மாத காலம் நீட்டிப்பு
இதுகுறித்து மாவட்ட உணவு பாதுகாப்பு துறை அதிகாரி எஸ்.லட்சுமிநாராயணன் கூறியதாவது:-உணவு பாதுகாப்பு சட்டம் - 1954 தற்போது உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தரநிர்ணய சட்டமாக மாற்றம் செய்யப்பட்டு உள்ளது. இந்த சட்டத்தின் படி உணவகங்கள் மற்றும் அதுதொடர்பாக தொழில் செய்துவருபவர்கள் முறையாக உரிமம் பெறுவதுடன், பதிவு செய்யப்பட வேண்டும். இதற்கு கடந்த 4-ந்தேதி கடைசி தேதியாக அறிவிக்கப்பட்டிருந்தது.தற்போது மத்திய அரசு மேலும் 6 மாதத்திற்கு கால நீட்டிப்பு செய்துள்ளது. இதுகுறித்து உணவு தொழில் செய்துவருபவர்கள், உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தரநிர்ணய சட்டத்தின் படி உணவகங்கள் சுத்தமாகவும், முறையாகவும் பராமரிக்க வேண்டும் என்று விழிப்புணர்வு அளித்து வருகிறோம். பதிவு, உரிமம் அவசியம்
உணவுபாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தரநிர்ணயசட்டத்தின் படி, உணவு தொழிலில் ஈடுபடுபவர்கள் உரிமம் பெற வேண்டும். அதில் சற்று விதிவிலக்காக ஆண்டு வருமானம் ரு.12 லட்சத்திற்கு மேல் இருந்தால் உணவு பாதுகாப்பு துறையில் ரூ.2 ஆயிரம் கட்டணம் செலுத்தி கண்டிப்பாக உரிமம் பெற்றிருக்க வேண்டும். ரூ.12 லட்சத்திற்கு குறைவாக இருப்பவர்கள் ரூ.100 செலுத்தி உணவு பாதுகாப்பு துறையில் பதிவு செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்.சென்னையை பொருத்தவரையில் 12 ஆயிரம் பேர் உரிமம் பெறுபவர்களாகவும், 23 ஆயிரம் பேர் பதிவு செய்பவர்கள் இருப்பதாக கணக்கிடப்பட்டு உள்ளது. இதில் 10 ஆயிரம் பேர் சாலை ஓர உணவகங்களை நடத்துபவர்கள் என்று தெரியவந்துள்ளது. இவர்கள் முறையாக உணவு பாதுகாப்பு துறையில் பதிவு செய்ய வேண்டும் என்று அறிவுறுத்தப்பட்டு வருகிறது.
200 பேர் பதிவு
இதற்காக அண்ணாநகரில் நடத்தப்பட்ட விழிப்புணர்வில் 200 பேர் பதிவு செய்துள்ளனர். தொடர்ந்து தண்டையார்பேட்டை, சவுகார்பேட்டை, வேளாச்சேரி, அடையார், சென்டிரல் ரெயில் நிலையம் அருகில் உள்ள அல்லிகுளம் பகுதிகளிலும் விழிப்புணர்வு அளிக்க முடிவு செய்யப்பட்டு உள்ளது. உரிமம் மற்றும் பதிவு செய்யாதவர்களுக்கு ரூ.25 ஆயிரம் முதல் ரூ.10 லட்சம் வரை அபராதம் விதிக்கப்படுவதுடன், 6 மாதம் சிறைதண்டனையும் விதிக்கப்படலாம்.உணவு பாதுகாப்பு சட்டம் - 1954ன் கீழ் பதிவு செய்துள்ள உணவகங்கள் தற்போது புதிய சட்டமான உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தரநிர்ணய சட்டத்தின் கீழ் முறையாக தங்கள் உரிமத்தை மாற்றம் செய்திருக்க வேண்டும். இதுகுறித்து கூடுதல் தகவல் பெற விரும்புபவர்கள் 86828-68400 என்ற செல்போனில் தொடர்பு கொண்டு பெற்றுக் கொள்ளலாம்.இவ்வாறு அவர் கூறினார்.
மாற்றம் தேவை
சென்னை ஓட்டல் உரிமையாளர்கள் சங்க தலைவர் கே.டி.ஸ்ரீனிவாசன் கூறும்போது உரிமம் பதிவு செய்ய மத்திய அரசு காலகெடு வழங்கி உள்ளது. சிறிய தவறுகளுக்கு கடுமையான தண்டனை வழங்குவதன் மூலம் ஓட்டல் தொழில் பாதிக்கப்படுகிறது. இதனால் இந்த சட்டத்தில் இதனை மாற்றியமைக்க வேண்டும் என்றார்.

Merchants thank PM

Members of Tamil Nadu Foodgrains Merchants Association have thanked Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare Ghulam Nabi Azad for extending by six months the time for the foodgrains merchants to register themselves and take licence under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. In a statement, M. Karthikeyan, joint secretary of the association, said the members of the association met Mr.Azad on January 31. N.S.V. Chitthan, Member of Parliament, Dindigul constituency, and B. Manick Tagore, Member of Parliament, Virudhunagar, arranged the meeting with the Union Minister.

உணவு பாதுகாப்பு உரிமம் பெற அவகாசம்: வணிகர்களுக்கு நிம்மதி

சென்னை: உணவு பாதுகாப்புத் துறையில் உரிமம் பெற, பிப்., 4ம் தேதியுடன் கெடு முடிந்த நிலையில், மத்திய அரசு, மேலும், ஆறு மாதத்திற்கு அவகாசத்தை நீட்டித்துள்ளது. இது, நெருக்கடியில் இருந்த வணிகர்களுக்கு நிம்மதி அளித்துள்ளது. நுகர்வோருக்கு தரமான உணவுப் பொருள் கிடைக்க வழி செய்யும் வகையில், மத்திய அரசால், "உணவு பாதுகாப்பு மற்றும் தர நிர்ணயச் சட்டம் - 2006' கொண்டு வரப்பட்டது. விதிமுறைகள் வகுக்கப்பட்டு, 2011ல் அமலுக்கு வந்தது. இதன்படி, ஆண்டுக்கு, 12 லட்சம் ரூபாய்க்குள் 
வர்த்தகம் செய்வோர், 100 ரூபாய் செலுத்தி, உணவு பாதுகாப்புத் துறையில் பதிவுச் சான்றும்; அதற்கு மேல் வர்த்தகம் செய்வோர், 2,000 ரூபாய் செலுத்தி, உரிமமும் பெற வேண்டும். பதிவு, உரிமம் பெறாவிட்டால், 5 லட்சம் ரூபாய் வரை அபராதம், ஆறு மாத சிறைத் தண்டனை விதிக்கப்படும்.ஆனால், "விதிமுறைகள் தற்காலத்திற்கு ஏற்ப இல்லை; திருத்தம் வேண்டும்' என, வணிகர்கள் கடும் எதிர்ப்பு தெரிவித்து வருகின்றனர். 
இரண்டு முறை அவகாசம் : தரப்பட்டாலும், பதிவுச்சான்று, உரிமம் பெற, வணிகர்கள் ஆர்வம் காட்டவில்லை.
தமிழகத்தில், 30 சதவீத வணிகர்கள் கூட, பதிவு உரிமம் பெறவில்லை. மத்திய அரசின் ஓராண்டு அவகாசம், பிப்.,4ம் தேதியுடன் முடிந்ததால், உணவு பாதுகாப்புத் துறையின் நெருக்கடிக்கு ஆளாகும் நிலை ஏற்பட்டது.
"விதிகளில் திருத்தம் செய்யும் வரை, மேலும் கால அவகாசம் வேண்டும்' என, வணிகர்கள் 
வலியுறுத்தி வந்தனர். இந்த நிலையில், இதற்கான அவகாசத்தை மேலும், ஆறு மாதத்திற்கு மத்திய 
அரசு நீட்டித்துள்ளது. இதன்படி, ஆக.,4ம் தேதிக்குள் பதிவுச் சான்று, உரிமம் பெற வேண்டும்.
தமிழ்நாடு உணவுப்பொருள் வியாபாரிகள் சங்க நிர்வாகி, வேல்சங்கர் கூறுகையில், ""இது நிச்சயம் வணிகர்களுக்கு ஆறுதல் தரும். உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அதிகாரிகள், வியாபாரிகளை மிரட்டும் 
செயல் தொடராது,'' என்றார்.அவகாசம் நீட்டிப்பு செய்யப்பட்டதற்கு, தமிழ்நாடு வணிகர் சங்க பேரமைப்பு உள்ளிட்ட, வணிக சங்கங்கள், மத்திய அரசுக்கு நன்றி தெரிவித்துள்ளன.