Nov 10, 2012

BIS certification mandatory for packaged water: court

Holding that packaged drinking water comes within the purview of Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006, the Karnataka High Court on Friday said that certification from the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is mandatory for packaged drinking water.
The court also directed the State government to take action to prohibit and prevent the manufacture and sale of packaged drinking water without BIS certification.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Vikramajit Sen and Justice Aravind Kumar passed the order while disposing of a public interest litigation (PIL) petition by Lochamesh B. Hugar of Hubli complaining inaction by the authorities against manufacturers of packaged drinking water operating without BIS certification, and a batch of petitions filed by the manufacturers claiming that certification from BIS was not necessary.
The Bench also directed the authorities to take action against the manufacturers if they found them operating without certification from BIS.
However, noticing that there are 564 packaged drinking water manufacturing units without BIS certification as against 224 with BIS certification across the State, the court has given an opportunity for those operating without BIS certification to apply for certification.
The Bench said that all manufacturers will have to submit applications for BIS certification in the prescribed format within 15 days. It directed the authorities concerned, including the BIS, to process the application within three months and notify the deficiencies, if any, in these units. The Bench said that entire exercise will have to be completed within four months.
Meanwhile, the court has given liberty to the authorities to initiate action against those manufacturers who fail to adhere to the directions and comply with conditions for manufacturing packaged drinking water.

Adulterated sweets keep food inspectors on toes

Unchecked supply of adulterated sweets during the Diwali festival has put Food and Civil Supply Department on its toes. To curb supply of adulterated sweet stuffs the department has asked districts officials to start a drive and collect samples from shops.
Confectioners of city have already started stocking dry sweets with preservatives giving an excuse that it is the only way to store special sweets brought from Kolkata and Delhi.
Jharkhand Director-in-Chief (Food) TP Burnawal said, “Inspection is going on and food safety officers are collecting samples every day. These samples will be tested in the Food Testing Laboratory. Strict actions will be taken those who will be found guilty.”
The Food and Drugs Testing Laboratory which was virtually defunct for more than two years is also functional now. In Ranchi there are only three food inspectors to check the food quality of more than 3000 registered hotels and restaurants here. Officials of Health Department are also keeping an eye on shopkeepers and agents dealing in adulterated food stuffs.
According to the Food Safety and Standard Act 2006, a person selling or producing adulterated food can be fined up to Rs 10 lakh. The punishment ranges between imprisonments of three months to life.
Nitin Churuwala, owner of Churuwala Inn, “To elevate profits confectioners do deliberately mix adulterants and spurious maawa. Buyers can themselves recognise artificial sweets. There are some easy ways to identify adulterated sweets like the silver coating done on ladoos and barfis will not stick to fingers if they are silver and if it sticks the coating is of aluminum.”
“The trend of gifting sweets is now changing. People prefer dry fruits and chocolates over sweets,” added Churuwala.
Not only dry fruits and chocolates, the malpractice has brought traditional sweets like baalushahi, chandrakala and besan ladoo in bad taste.
Darshana Gulati, a homemaker said, “Milk is being sold at Rs 35 per liter, how can a shopkeeper sell cheese at the rate of Rs 100 per kg? I prefer making shakkar para and gujiya at home rather than buying sweets from market.”

Raids, whistle-blowers programme launched to curb adulteration

FDAs and FDCAs (Food & Drug Administration and Food & Drugs Control Administration) that are busy ensuring complete compliance with the Food Safety and Standards Regulations, 2011, have come up with a two-pronged strategy to crack down on adulteration, a rampant malpractice that increases during the festive season.

In this regard, the authorities concerned have not only vested in food safety officers (FSOs) of all states to raid errant food business operators' (FBOs) establishments, but also put in place a whistle-blower system across the country to be vigilant and inform FSOs of any cases of adulteration.

Meanwhile, the Food Safety & Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has announced that information providers will be duly rewarded. In fact, raids have already been conducted on FBOs' premises in various parts of the country, and adulterated food, estimated to be worth several crores of rupees, has been seized by the authorities. The food safety commissioners of a few states confirmed.

Maharashtra
K B Sankhe, joint commissioner (food), Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA), said, “Before the festive season, we selected about 109 samples of mithai and mawa from all over the state and sent these to the laboratory for tests. We are awaiting the results of the same. Adulterated mawa is sourced from Gujarat and used to make sweets for the festive season.”

“Before the festive season commenced, we seized mawa and mithai worth more than Rs 3 lakh, and will prosecute the culprits or impose a fine of upto Rs 1 lakh if they are found indulging in adulteration. Adulteration not only reduces the quality of food, but it also weakens the person who consumes them, thereby resulting in an increase in the cost of healthcare,” he said.

Sankhe said the regular intake of adulterated food could lead to a number of heath problems, which include both curable and incurable diseases and disorders. “The use of toxic colouring agents as adulterants in fruit, vegetables and sweets is very dangerous when it comes to the health of a person. It can lead to serious health issues such as cancer, cardiac problems, insomnia, paralysis and other neurological problems, and could even lead to death,” he said.

The official explained, “As far as the adulteration of honey is concerned, it appeared to be safer than using toxic chemicals as adulterants. Moreover, this will merely have an adverse economic impact and is unlikely to result in any health issues. Even milk can be adulterated with artificial chemicals, and this may not have any tangible impact on the milk itself.”

Gujarat
H G Koshia, food safety commissioner, Gujarat Food and Drug Control Administration (FDCA), said, “Recently we raided three big factories in Gujarat which indulged in the act of adulteration. These factories used artificial colours and Rajasthan marble dust powder to adulterate cumin (jeera) seeds and thereby increase their quantity and reduce their quality, with the sole objective of increasing their profit margin.”

He added, “We seized about 20,000 kg of cumin seeds – estimated to be worth more than Rs 7 lakh – and have sent the samples for analysis. We have also registered a case against the company involved in the act of adulteration. Acting on our complaint, the offenders have been arrested by the local police. Water in milk is the most common example of adulteration. Argemone oil is a harmful substance of a low grade which is mixed with mustard oil.”

“Other common adulterants include other kinds of leaves and sawdust, which are mixed with tea leaves. Toxic chemicals may be used to colour sweets. Methanol is an adulterant in alcohol. Ghee may be mixed with vanaspati, and honey is mixed with other kinds of sugars. Pulses are adulterated with artificial colours in order to make them appear fresh. Likewise, fruit and vegetables may be adulterated with toxic colours to increase the profit margin,” said Koshia.

A food official from Gujarat FDCA,  on the condition of anonymity, said, “Turmeric, red chilli powder, coriander and other essential ingredients of food cooked in our homes may actually be fake. Red chilli powder is in fact sold at a price far lower than actual chillies. Despite being a processed food, how is this possible? The answer is red chilli powder often contains only 30 per cent of good chilli.”

“The remaining 70 per cent of chillies are those that are either rotten or have been rejected by shops. These are first dried and then red food colour is added to them before they are powdered and sold. This is what ensures the reddish colour the moment it is added to our food. Cumin seeds are sold at Rs 70-80 per kg and their twigs are sold at Rs 5 per kg. Since the twigs smell and look the same, the powder is likely to fool most customers,” he added.

The official added, “After the powder is packaged, the profit margin is huge. Turmeric powder may not actually be turmeric. The powders of maize grain and damaged rice are mixed with yellow edible colour and artificial flavour and the result is fake turmeric, which is sold cheap. Ghee has the maximum scope for adulteration. Pure ghee might not even contain a drop of pure ghee.”

Kerala
V S Sivakumar, health minister, Government of Kerala, said, “It is clear that be it salt, meat, fish, vegetables or fruit, adulteration has been common. It is not only the retailers who are involved in malpractices, but also the wholesalers and others who bring the commodities from outside the state. But there are limitations for the food safety commissioner and other officials to trace it.”

“It is against the backdrop that a mechanism to engage the civil society also for better results is being probed. Whistle-blowers should be rewarded by the state government for providing information about adulteration to FSOs. Adulteration is a big issue in India and it is affecting the health of the people. The Act needs to be implemented so that those who are involved in food adulteration should fear before indulging in the malpractice,” he said.

Bureau of Indian Standards tag must for packaged water: HC

BANGALORE: Holding that packaged drinking water falls within the domain of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, the Karnataka high court on Friday said that certification by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is mandatory for packaged drinking water.
Disposing of a batch of petitions, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Vikramajit Sen and Justice Aravind Kumar directed the state government to take all necessary steps to prohibit/prevent the manufacture and sale of packaged drinking water without the certification of BIS.
The bench further directed the authorities to take action against those manufacturers of packaged drinking water if they were found to be running their units without BIS certification.
Noting that as against 224 units with BIS certification, 564 without certification are operating in Karnataka, the bench decided to give them an opportunity to apply for certification. All these manufacturers have been granted 15 days time for submitting the prescribed application to the authorities concerned under the FSS Act, BIS Act and also regulations for issue of BIS certificate.
The authorities have been asked to process the same within three months and notify the deficiencies if any. The entire exercise has to be completed in an outer limit of four months, in case of exigencies.
The petitioners had complained that even though there was a bar on selling packaged drinking water without the ISI mark, the authorities have not taken steps to prevent it. Some of the manufacturers contended that they were not covered under the FSS Act.

The question of food safety

- Hueiyen Lanpao Editorial :: November 10 2012 -

Though already late, it is good to know that the Government of Manipur has finally woken up to giving due importance to the cause of general health and hygiene of the people, and decided to act tough against shops selling eatable items and other food manufacturing units being operated in the State without possessing the required registration certificates and license.

After being passed by the Indian Parliament on August 23, 2006, the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 has been implemented as a law with effect from August 5, 2011 throughout the country including Manipur.

Under this Act, owners of shops and other business establishments selling eatable items as well as companies manufacturing food items need to register themselves and possess the required registration certificates and licenses from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), which has been mandated under the provisions of the Act to ensure availability of wholesome safe food for human consumption.

At the State level, the Commissioner of Food Safety is the highest regulatory and implementing authority of the Act. It is unfortunate to learn that people of the State in general and the owners of shops and other business establishments dealing in food items in particular do not understand the significance of the Act.

As some of the Food Safety Officers in the State have themselves admitted, lack of awareness has been at the root cause of total neglect of the Act and its provisions in Manipur, and consequently, the failure of the shop-keepers and proprietors of food manufacturing units to register and possess the required registration certificates and licenses from FSSAI.

So, the authorities concerned need to find out ways and means to generate awareness among the people. Here, we should understand the simple fact that for successful implementation of any legislation or developmental scheme/project, mass publicity campaign out in the field is imperative.

Organising a couple of workshops or seminars within the confined of an air-conditioned conference hall of some classy hotels and then claiming that publicity campaigns have been carried out to convey the message to owners of shops and other business establishments dealing in food items or extending deadline for registration wouldn't simply work.

One needs to be more sincere and dedicated towards ensuring availability of wholesome safe food for human consumption.

Let's be clear that unsafe food not only causes many acute and life-long diseases, but also pose a growing threat to public health.

So, when it comes to the question of life and death, do we need time to wait for an answer?