Nov 1, 2012

Makers of fake brands and inferior food fined

‘The traders who failed to meet quality standards would be fined up to Rs five lakh. The traders indulging in sale of inferior food will be punished with imprisonment’

Eluru: West Godavari District Joint Collector Dr T Baburao Naidu warned businessmen selling inferior quality foods and fake brands with fining heavily as per latest laws. Whipping his legal powers as an authority under Food Safety and Standards Act, he organised a court for trial of dozen cases of adulteration of food at Collectorate here on Wednesday.

Speaking on the occasion, he said the traders who failed to meet quality standards would be fined up to Rs five lakh. He warned the traders indulging in sale of inferior food with imprisonment. The guilty would be tried under the law. A fine of Rs three lakh would be imposed with respect to traders selling fake brand food products. For preparation of food products under unhygienic conditions, the authorities could penalise the traders up to Rs one lakh, he said.

The legal authority on implementation of law said that the act enacted in 2006 would safeguard consumers from adulteration and harmful ingredients in food. Any violation of rules would enable the authorities to fine the traders up to Rs 10 lash, besides 10 years of imprisonment, he warned.

The Joint Collector said a penalty of Rs five lakh and jail term of six months would be slapped against the businessmen engaged in food preparation without licence. After the enactment of new law, as many as 12 cases of violation were registered in the district, he said.

The cases the Joint Collector conducted trial included two adulteration of chilli and turmeric products, seven cooking oil and vanaspati, two contaminated water and one inferior quality ghee. While five cases were posted for hearing on November 24, food product makers in five cases were fined on Wednesday. He asked the authorities to submit detailed reports regarding adulteration of chilli and turmeric powder cases.

Dr Baburao Naidu requested people to inform the food authorities about adulteration and fake brand sales of food products on phone No 08812230443. He asked the consumers to demand bills from the traders for their purchases to make their cases more effective in case of any violation of law.

FSSAI under food law introduces rules for new food products entering India

With continuous innovation and research happening in the area of foods, a lot of new products and new ingredients can be seen coming into the food segment especially under the nutraceutical and functional food category.

A lot of foods imported into the country also may contain ingredients which are being introduced in India for the first time.

Under the PFA (Prevention of Food Adulteration Act) regime, there was no provision to regulate such foods. The FSSAI ( Food Safety and Standards Authority of India) under the new food law has introduced a regulation providing for requirement of new food product/ingredient approval before obtaining a license for the manufacturing of such foods.

The requirements

It has been provided under Schedule 1 of FSS (Licensing & Registration) Regulation, 2011 that food business operators manufacturing food containing ingredients or using technologies that do not have a history of safety or having ingredients which are introduced in the country for the first time need to obtain FSSA licence. According to the Food Authority, such FBOs must apply for product approval before applying for a central licence.

Who all are covered

All the food business operators who are manufacturing or importing any article of food containing ingredients or substances or employing processes or technologies whose safety has not been established. It also includes any food article containing ingredients or employing technologies which do not have a history of safe use.

The process

Applicant must apply for every product or ingredient approval separately in the format prescribed by the authority. Application must be made with a demand draft of Rs 25,000 in favour of senior accounts officer, FSSAI payable at Delhi.

This payment shall be made towards initial screening of the application by the Approval Screening Committee. The envelope must be superscribed with the heading "New Product/Ingredient Approval".

The committee will decide whether the product shall fall under either of the categories mentioned above. Category A shall include applications where the product safety can be established.

Applications where further assessment is required are classified under category B. They will be sent to scientific committee. The applicant will have to furnish an additional payment of Rs 25,000.

Furnishing information

The format provided for application describes extensively the information and data supporting to be provided by the applicant. Administrative information, technical details, information on efficacy and nutritional impact of the product are the aspects to be covered by the applicant.

Technical information is the second section of the application. Name of the new ingredient or new product must be provided. In case of product application, the common name, product composition and the brand name if applicable must be provided.

With respect to new ingredient application, the chemical or other name, name of the food in which it is proposed to be used along with the concentration, and the brand name must be provided.

The functional use of the product/ingredient as defined along with its composition and its affects and side-effects for different category of people (like children, pregnant women etc) must be detailed in the application.

FBOs’ licensing & registration process across India makes slow progress

The licensing and registration of food business operators (FBOs), FSSAI’s mega campaign to bring all the FBOs and food processing companies under the umbrella of the Food Safety & Standards (Licensing & Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011, is once again in rough weather.

The programme, which was given a six-month extension to its previous deadline of August 4, 2012, could not utilise it properly as many states did not start the registration and licensing process as was expected of them. The regulations under FSSR for licensing and registration were first notified on August 5, 2011.

In some states, the state of affairs is shocking. For example, officials in-charge of licensing and registration in some states admitted to that the process was yet to start. Meanwhile, the online process, the software for which was developed with much fanfare, was also started on a trial basis in some states but even this could not gain the required momentum.

No wonder, a top official from FSSAI, on the condition of anonymity, informed FnB News, “Relaxation will be given to those states who have not yet started the process of registering and licensing the FBOs under the new regulations.”

As for Maharashtra, K B Sankhe, joint commissioner (food), FDA, Maharashtra, explained, “In Maharashtra, around 2,60,000 FBOs have already registered and licensed. Many FBOs are coming ahead to get themselves registered and licensed before the deadline of February 4, 2013. We are also organising awareness camps at many places in Maharashtra to make all the small and big food business operators aware about the importance of registration and licensing. Even though we initiated with online registration and licensing, the process through online is very slow.”

B Vijayan, food safety commissioner, Goa, stated, “More than 60 per cent of FBOs have been registered and licensed in Goa. The online process has not been successful here and the ratio is 70:30. Lack of awareness about online registration and licensing has forced many FBOs to apply manually.”

Talking about the progress in Gujarat, H G Koshia, food safety commissioner, FDCA, Gujarat, said, “We have registered and licensed more than 70,000 food business operators. Most of the registration and licensing was done manually and not online. The reason for this was lack of English and computer knowledge.

However, he added, “We are continuously organising awareness camps to make all FBOs aware about the importance of getting registered and licensed.”

Raji Srivastava, food safety commissioner, Punjab commented, “We have been conducting various awareness camps to make all the FBOs aware about the importance of getting themselves registered and licensed. The awareness camps organised by us are helping us to get more people to come ahead and get themselves licensed and registered. Till October 10, 2012, 4,576 and 24,599 FBOs have been issued licences and registration respectively.”

Meanwhile, Ashish Kumar, designated officer (headquarter), Bihar, said, “More than 14,000 FBOs from Bihar already have their licences and registration in place. We are waiting for more FBOs to come ahead and get them registered and licensed before the deadlines. They should not rush at last moment. We have also asked various organisations of FBOs to arrange awareness camps themselves and get more people for registration and licence. The online process is yet to start in our state.”

S Rajan, statistical officer, Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), Tamil Nadu, said, “Till date we have licensed and registered 1,51,310 FBOs. The number of FBOs who have been licensed are 17,316 and those who have registered themselves are 1,33,994. We are sure that before the deadlines we will be able to complete the process of licensing and registering of all the FBOs in the state. The process is offline because online work is under process.

Regulation 3.2.1 registration of petty food business
Every petty food manufacturer shall register themselves with the registering authority by submitting an application for registration in Form A under Schedule 2 of these regulations along with a fee as provided in Schedule 3.

The FBOs shall follow the basic hygiene and safety requirements provided in Schedule 4 (Part I) of these regulations and provide a self-attested declaration of adherence to these requirements with the application in the format provided in Annexure-1 under Schedule 2.

The registering authority shall consider the application and may either grant registration or reject it with reasons to be recorded in writing or issue notice for inspection, within 7 days of receipt of an application for registration. In the event of an inspection being ordered, the registration shall be granted by the registering authority after being satisfied with the safety, hygiene and sanitary conditions of the premises within a period of 30 days.

If registration is not granted, or denied, or inspection not ordered within 7 days as provided in above Sub-regulation (3) or no decision is communicated within 30 days as provided in above Sub-regulation (4), the food business operator may start his business, provided that it will be incumbent on the FBOs to comply with any improvement suggested by the registering authority at any later time provided that registration shall not be refused without giving the applicant an opportunity of being heard and for reasons to be recorded in writing. The registering authority shall issue a registration certificate and a photo identity card, which shall be displayed at prominent place at all times within the premises or vehicle or cart or any other place where the person carries on sale/manufacture of food in case of petty food business. The registering authority or any officer or agency specifically authorized for this purpose shall carry out food safety inspection of the registered establishments at least once in a year.

Regulation 3.2.2 license for food business
Subject to regulation 3.2.1 no person shall commence any food business unless he possesses a valid license under these regulations. Provided that any person or food business operator carrying on food business on the date of notification of these regulations, under a license, registration or permission, as the case may be, under the acts or orders mentioned in the second schedule of the act shall enable the licensing authority to collect complete information of all food establishments, get their existing license converted into the license/registration under these regulations by making an application to the licensing/registering authority within one year of notification of these regulations. No license fee will have to be paid for the remaining period of the validity of the earlier license or registration granted under any of the said acts or orders non-compliance with this provision by a food business operator will attract penalty under section 55 of the act. Provided further that any food business operator holding registration/license under any other act/order as specified under schedule 2 of the FSS Act, 2006, with no specific validity or expiry date, and other wise entitled to obtain a license under these regulations, shall have to apply and obtain a registration/license under these regulations within one year from the date of notification by paying the applicable fees.

DINAKARAN NEWS


Food items brought to Raj Bhavan kitchen rejected

Food Safety officials are said to have detected and rejected certain items, which were brought to the Raj Bhavan kitchen here on Tuesday to prepare food for the President during his visit to the State, on grounds that they were unfit for consumption. Food Safety Commissioner in-charge K. Anil Kumar said inspections of items brought for preparation of food for VVIPs were a standard procedure and if any of them were found to be of sub-standard quality, the norm was to reject them and replace the same with superior-quality ones. The same had happened on Tuesday, he said, stating that “one or two items” were replaced. A report on the same was expected on Wednesday. Similar procedures were followed when inedible materials were detected during a visit of A.P.J. Abdul Kalam when he was the President as well, Mr. Anil Kumar said, stressing that it was ensured that Mr. Mukherjee was served only safe food. Unconfirmed reports said at least six items were rejected, including cashew nuts and other spices, from a total of about 350 items.