Food Safety and Standards authority of India
Today
morning, I went to a nearby hotel for breakfast. In my last four years
in Bangalore, majority of my daily meals were from hotels. In the
counter, two people were standing in front of me. My eyes went through
the menu list pasted next to the printing machine; after having a quick
look I decided on Idly.
Next to that, price for tea and coffee
were also listed. I am not a big fan of tea/ coffee. Last time, I
ordered a full tea. But today, seeing the entry itself created a
terrible feeling. After all, only yesterday I read the result of ‘The
National Survey on Milk Adulteration 2011’.
The National Survey on Milk Adulteration 2011According
to the survey - ‘to ascertain the quality of milk and identify
different type of adulteration in the liquid milk throughout the
country’,
1. ‘total non-conforming samples were 1226 (68.4%)’.
2. ‘non-conformity of samples in rural areas were 381 (31%)’ [Packet samples: 64 (16.7%), Loose samples: 317 (83.2%).
3. ‘In urban area, the total non confirming samples were 845 (68.9%)’ [Packet samples: 282 (33.4%), Loose samples: 563 (66.6%).
4. ‘deviations
were found highest on account of Fat and SNF content in 574 samples
(46.8%) of the total non–conformity, which includes 147 samples with
detergent and two samples with neutralizers respectively’.
5. ‘Detergent was also found in 103 samples (8.4%). Perhaps the reason may be dilution of milk with water’.
6. ‘The
second highest parameter of non conformity was the Skim Milk Powder
(SMP) in 548 samples (44.69%) which includes presence of glucose in 477
samples. Glucose would have been added to milk probably to enhance SNF’.
7. ‘The presence of Skim Milk Powder indicates the reconstitution of milk powder’.
If I summarize,
1.
68.4% of milk is not fine for human consumption.
2.
Apart from water, detergents are also present in milk.
3.
People are adding milk powder.
4.
Neutralizers are also present in the milk.
RegionsThis
issue is not limited to any single part of India. Survey was carried
out by five regional offices of Food Safety and Standards Authority of
India (FSSAI) in 33 states; sample size was 1791.
Moral IssuesAfter
having breakfast, I walked towards a supermarket located some 200
meters away. Young man of around 30-32 years old was walking in the
opposite direction. I could see half litre milk packet, inside a
partially transparent plastic bag he was carrying. He may have a kid of
2-3 years old. It is also possible that the kid may drink this milk as
well– which may contain detergents and other things.
We are
buying milk (any other item for that matter) with the belief that, other
side will play fair. Moreover, everybody can’t have a cow at their
home.
ConclusionIt is a known fact that a good
percentage of milk selling in India is not adhering to the highest
standards, people made water as the twin brother of milk long time back;
but detergents? adding milk powder?
Food Safety and Standards
Authority of India (FSSAI) conducted a survey and enlightened the
people. Good thing, but who will take action against the entities
contaminating milk? Simply conducting an ‘ease of doing business survey’
will not increase the ease to do business. It should be firmly backed
by action at ground level. Here, if I am not wrong, independent India
always had food inspectors, regulators etc. Even this ‘Food Safety and
Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)’ was not created yesterday. Still
this is the situation.
It is important for government and its
various arms to make sure the security of her citizens. Providing
security is not limited to protecting borders or conducting income tax
raids, it also includes the protection of consumer and sanity of market
place.
Sajeev.