Dec 20, 2019

101 food samples tested in mobile vans fail quality standards

Chandigarh: Punjab government’s food safety vans, launched under the Tandarust Mission, have evoked a positive response across the state.
Of the 567 samples brought for testing by the public to these vans in October and November, 101 failed to meet the prescribed standards.
Tandarust Punjab Mission director Kahan Singh Pannu said mobile food safety vans are deployed on rotational basis in different districts. In October, a van was deployed in Hoshiarpur district where people brought 368 samples for testing, including 78 samples of milk and milk products, 49 of spices and condiments, 16 of water and beverages and 225 of sweets. Out of these, 40 failed the quality test.
Similarly in November, a food safety van was deployed in Ferozepur where 199 samples were tested. These included 60 samples of milk and milk products, 54 of spices and condiments, 20 samples of cereal and cereal products, 9 of salt and 56 of miscellaneous food items. Of these, 61 flunked the test.
Lauding the citizens for their support, Pannu said for on-the-spot testing of samples in the food safety vans, a nominal test charge to the tune of Rs 50 per sample was levied. After the analysis, the citizens were given certified copies of the report on the spot.

Dec 19, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS




Now hygiene ratings at Haryana eateries




Junk food regulation stalled by food industry, CSE claims

The CSE tested the fast-food against yet-to-be-notified thresholds set by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and all were in breach.
Given consumers have a right to know what they are consuming, the government must provide clarity on the notification of the regulations.
The findings of a lab-analysis of 33 popular junk foods from top-billed brands, including PepsiCo’s Lays, Nestle’s Maggi, and Mc Donald’s, among others, by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) show consumers could be ingesting unhealthy amounts of salt and fat. The CSE tested the fast-food against yet-to-be-notified thresholds set by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and all were in breach—indeed, one brand of snacks marketed as a healthier alternative to conventional offerings had twice the level of salt allowed in a day from a snack. But, the real shocker is CSE’s assertion that consumers have been kept in the dark because the processed food lobby is thwarting the notification of the Food Safety Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations that would replace the existing Regulations.
FSSAI had already taken five years—work had started in 2013—when it came up with a draft in 2018 that was sent to the health ministry for finalisation. The draft proposed that packaged food containing more than its prescribed thresholds of salt, transfats, added sugars, and other nutritional components that pose health risks carry a front-of-the-pack red mark to indicate these risks. But, following objections from the food industry, FSSAI sent the draft for review to a committee headed by B Sesikeran, a trustee of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), in August 2018. ILSI is financed by Coca-Cola, PespsiCo, Nestle, Danone, and other food industry giants. While the final draft Labelling and Display Regulations—announced in June 2019—retains the ‘red mark’ provision of the 2018 draft, it dilutes several thresholds. For instance, as per the 2019 draft released after the Sesikeran committee submitted its report—the report was never made public—a product will have to be marked ‘red’ if the energy provided by the added sugar content is more than 10% of the total energy provided by 100g of the product. But, the 2019 draft dropped the 2018 draft’s labelling requirement for total sugar in favour of ‘added sugar’—that means the manufacturer doesn’t have to inform the consumer about the naturally occurring sugar in the food. Also, the threshold for added sugar has been set at 50 g, the same as the 2018 threshold for total sugar.
Whether or not the food companies are stalling the notification of the regulations is difficult to say. But, given consumers have a right to know what they are consuming, the government must provide clarity on the notification of the regulations. New York Times reports that, in China, ILSI shares office space and staff with the body tasked with battling the country’s obesity epidemic, and, in Brazil, its representatives occupy seats that were previously reserved for university researchers on food and nutrition panels. Against such a backdrop, the government needs to be very circumspect about the heft it allows food industry representatives in food standards regulation.

Time to junk packaged food!

Food items like noodles, fries contain high levels of salt, fat: Report
New Delhi, December 17
A new report by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) claims that most packaged food and fast food items being sold in India contain high levels of salt and fats in them, much higher than the threshold set by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), but not notified.
The study tested salt, fats, trans-fats and carbohydrates in 33 popular junk foods, which include 14 samples of chips, namkeen, instant noodles and soups and 19 samples of burgers, fries, fried chicken, pizza, sandwich and wraps. 
“These samples were collected from grocery stores and fast food outlets in Delhi and are known to be widely sold and consumed across the country,” read a statement by the CSE.
‘Consumers should know what they eat’
The industry is opposing the notification of draft regulation because then we will know how bad their food is. We have found dangerously high levels of salt and fats in all packaged food and fast food samples that we tested. Consumers have the right to know what is contained in the package. Sunita Narain, CSE Director General
They include brands like Knorr tomato soup, Nestle’s Maggi, Patanjali atta noodles, Haldiram, LAY’S and Too Yumm chips (endorsed by cricket icon Virat Kohli), Haldiram’s classic nut crackers and aloo bhujia, Kurkure, Bingo mad angles, burgers, fries and wraps from fast food chains like the KFC, McDonald’s, Burger King, Domino’s, Pizza Hut and Subway. 
According to the tests conducted by CSE’s Environment Monitoring Laboratory (EML), levels of salt are much higher than the threshold set by industry body — FSSAI. The EML is known for its earlier findings on food products consumed in India (pesticide in soft drinks), potassium bromate in bread, antibiotics in honey and chicken. 
CSE director general Sunita Narain said: “The industry is opposing the notification of draft regulation because then we will know how bad their food is. We have found dangerously high levels of salt and fats in all packaged food and fast food samples that we tested. Consumers have the right to know what is contained in the package. But our food regulator, the FSSAI, is dragging its feet and has not notified its own draft labelling regulation. This is clearly because of pressure from the powerful food industry. This is not acceptable. This is compromising our right to know and our right to health.”
“Expert group made recommendations six years ago, but the draft regulation that has emerged is severely diluted. Even this much-diluted draft has not been notified,” the CSE said, calling for urgent notification of labeling laws and RED warning label on food items that cross the healthy threshold.

Regular monitoring for heavy metals in soil-food crops soon

Delhi The country’s apex food safety regulator, Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), along with the Ministry of Agriculture, will soon start regular monitoring for presence of heavy metals in soil–food crops. Tests are likely to be conducted for the presence of heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury.
“The presence of heavy metals, especially four big ones such as lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury, in produce is an area of concern that we aim to check through regular monitoring, like in case of pesticides,” FSSAI CEO Pawan Agarwal said.
In a recently released result of the food and beverages samples analysed last year, the FSSAI found that nearly 4% of the 1,00,000 samples analysed by states and union territories were unsafe.
In another survey of raw and processed milk being sold across the country, the food regulator found about 6% of the milk samples to contain Aflatoxin M1, a liver-toxic micro-contaminant, also known as carcinogen.
The food safety regulator has commissioned another pan-India survey to understand the extent of the problem regarding the presence of heavy metals in soil-food crops. The survey was conducted on vegetables to know the contamination pattern across India and its possible sources. The data is still in the process of being collated, and is likely to be released next week.
“The regulator wanted to get a sense of the problem since there have been talks of crops from various riverbeds being mainly contaminated. There are also experts suggesting that air pollution is resulting in our produce getting contaminated with harmful metals such as lead. The matter was taken up with the ministry of agriculture,” said Agarwal.
According to experts, prolonged exposure to these heavy metals could even damage organs.
“A person would usually suffer from chronic condition rather than symptoms related to acute metal toxicity,” said Dr Suranjit Chatterjee, senior consultant, internal medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital. “The focus should be to prevent contamination so that experts can look at how best to minimise the effect. The idea is to create a safe food ecosystem in the long run.”

‘Build wall to stop sale of junk food near schools’

Noida: All schools should impose restrictions on the sale of junk food within a 100-yard radius, just like they do with cigarettes, stated environmentalist and founder of the Centre for Science and Environment, Sunita Narain. A CSE study based on laboratory tests conducted by them between July and November, 2019 found levels of salt, fat and sugar much higher than thresholds set by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) in such food. 
In a press conference held by Narain on Tuesday at India Habitat Centre, the CSE chief said, most packaged food and fast food items being sold in India contain “dangerously” high levels of salt and fat in them. She added that a lack of upfront labelling to alert consumers of this high content of sugar, salt and fat, fails to dissuade parents from stopping children from consuming junk food.
“The target of the junk food industry are children and each day, if a child has just a packet of chips or a bowl of instant noodles, he or she exhausts the entire day's quota of salt or sugar intake,” Sunita Narain said.

Dec 18, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


Fast food quality sets alarm bells ringing




Junk food monster: Food, safety, standards: a progressive onslaught


Junk food monster: Misleading labels on trans fat


Junk food monster: Mark junk food red How all the 33 tested products would look if the proposed red marking rule is applied to high fat and salt foods


Junk food monster: Communicating diseases

A lab study by the Centre for Science and Environment has found extremely high levels of salt, fat and trans fat in junk foods responsible for obesity and non-communicable diseases like hypertension, diabetes and heart ailments. 
Think before you open the next pack of Haldiram's Classic Nut Crackers or dig into a regular Non Veg Supreme Pizza from Domino’s. Only 35 grams of the scrumptious nut crackers would finish up around 35 per cent of your daily permissible salt intake and 26 per cent of the allowed fat consumption. And four slices of that cheesy pizza would make you consume 99.9 per cent of the day’s allowed salt and 72.8 per cent of fats.
Consumption of these junk foods, that are high in salt, fats and trans fats can have deadly impacts. Doctors say they are an open invitation to non-communicable diseases like diabetes, hypertension, heart ailments and even cancer.
“These diseases are difficult to manage if manifested early in life,” says Ambrish Mithal, head of the endocrinology and diabetes division, Medanta Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana. A 2016 report by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) shows a worrying trend — disease burden due to unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol and being overweight has increased from 10 per cent to 25 per cent since 1990. And the victims, many a time, were ill-informed and unsuspecting consumers.
It never bothered Manjeet Singh, an advocate in Delhi, that her 11-year-old son gorged on packaged and fast foods every day. It kept him full and happy, and saved her a lot of time and trouble. Not until the boy started complaining of double vision and headaches. Manjeet was shocked when doctors said he had high blood pressure. “They strictly advised him to reduce weight, not eat junk food and adopt a low-salt diet, else he would be under the risk of cardiac problems and diabetes,” she says. Manjeet could have helped her son had she known, upfront, what was inside those ultra-processed food packs.
The fine print declaring the amount of nutrients is not of much help. “With my vision, I would be spending the entire day buying food if I start reading them,” says Ashok Gulati, a 64-year-old retired professional. It’s impossible for 22-year-old Parvesh Sinha, a departmental store worker who never went to school, to know what he eats.
The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a Delhi-based research and advocacy non-profit, had shaken up the country in 2012 when it found high amounts of salt, fat, trans fat and carbohydrate in foods people love to eat. Seven years later, where exactly do we stand?
To understand this, between July and October 2019, CSE’s Environment Monitoring Laboratory again tested their content in 33 popular packaged and fast foods marketed by Indian and multi-national companies and available across the country.
The samples were collected from grocery stores and fast food outlets in Delhi. The lab used internationally accepted testing methods listed by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Carbohydrate in these foods was tested by the widely used colorimetry method.
The lab results were used to understand how much of each nutrient contributes to the recommended dietary intake for the Indian population. It corelated the results with the serving size or weight of the products to understand the actual intake. The results, to say the least, were shocking.
Chips and namkeens had way more salt and fat than one should consume in a snack. Instant noodles and soups had too much salt.
The analysis was based on the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), derived after reviewing the recommendations of World Health Organization (WHO), National Institute of Nutrition-India, ICMR and the scientific expert groups of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
The RDA for salt was reached at 5g, 60 g fat and 300 g carbohydrate for one person in a day. The trans fat limit was 2.2 g. The calculations were made taking into account the accepted 2,000 kilocalorie that a healthy person requires in a day.
Considering we have three meals in a day and two snacks, our mealtime consumption of these nutrients should not be more than 25 per cent of RDA, and the two main snacks of the day must not add more than 10 per cent of RDA. Now take a look at what the CSE lab tests found. 

Chips and namkeens
What’s advertised by Indian cricket captain Virat Kohli as a healthy and “Smart option for smart snacker” is, in fact, unhealthiest in terms of salt. Of all the chips packets tested, Too Yumm Multigrain Chips had the maximum salt — 1 g in 30 g of chips.
In other words, 30 g of this gives double the day’s allowance of salt from a snack. And even a healthy green vegetable or a leafy salad becomes a source of extra salt. So think again before grabbing on the second snack of the day if you have already munched on Too Yumm Multigrain Chips.
In fact, all the chips tested either had high salt or high fat, or both. Lay’s India’s Magic Masala, Uncle Chipps Spicy Treat and Haldiram’s Chips Pudina Treat exceeded 10 per cent RDA of both salt and fat. One-fifth of the day’s fat RDA gets blown away if one consumes one serve of Haldiram’s Chips Pudina Treat.
Worse, there are chips packets that mention 30 g as the serving size — the amount allowed for consumption — but are not available in that size only. For instance, the Rs 20 pack of Lay’s American Style Cream and Onion that weighs 52 g, mentions 30 g as its serving size.
In effect, it offers more chips than one can consume in one go. So before relaxing on the sofa with a packet of chips, read the fine print and do the mental math to know exactly how many can be enjoyed without getting worried about health.
Haldiram’s Chips Pudina Treat does not even mention the serving size. In fact, it attracts consumers by offering them extra chips. Too Yumm Multigrain Chips gives vague information on the serving size. It says: “Image is a pictorial reference of serving suggestion”. While the picture shows only four-five chips, that's definitely not how much children stop with.
Eating chips frequently results in dental problems, a common ailment otherwise left ignored. “Chips are sticky and remain in the oral cavity for long hours. Soon, they start to ferment resulting in tooth decay and cavities,” says Praveen Chaudhary, senior dentist and head of the department at Jaypee Hospital in Noida, Uttar Pradesh.
CSE’s lab tested four varieties of namkeens. All but one had high salt and fat content, but Haldiram’s Classic Nut Cracker had criminally high salt, exhausting almost 35 per cent of RDA — much higher than one should consume in one full meal. It mentions the 35-g serving size only on its website. Checking this online before tearing the pack open is a difficult proposition.
Haldiram’s Aloo Bhujia exhausts more than 21 per cent of the salt RDA. But there’s no way consumers can know how much salt they consume from these namkeens and chips.
Of the 14 packed foods CSE tested, 10 declare sodium in their products, not salt, which leaves the consumer misinformed. Three don't declare sodium or salt. Only one declares salt. Manjeet, for instance, carefully read the nutritional information of the chips her son regularly munches on, but could not tell how much salt he consumes.
Clearly, food companies are complicating facts. One should consume not more than 2 g sodium in a day, but companies give the information in mg. Now do the mental math one more time. 

Instant noodles and soup 
Akshat, a 13-year-old school student, eats Nestle Maggi Masala instant noodles twice or thrice a week. It’s easily available in his school canteen. But a 70-g pack of this puts 2.6 g salt into our body.
Patanjali, which promotes its Atta Noodles Chatpata with the punchline ‘Jhatpat Banao, Befikr Khao’, contains 2.4 g salt in one pack. Remember, 5 g is all that is allowed through the day.
Ching’s Secret Schezwan goes a step further. It labels less than half the amount of what it actually contains, according to CSE’s lab results.
Similarly, instant soup is popular in winters, but is definitely not a healthy option. Just one serve of Knorr Classic Thick Tomato soup can exhaust over one-fourth of the daily salt limit.
And people love to have it as a starter before meals. So, even a healthy meal afterwards can shoot up your daily salt intake, that too within a short period. As consumers misconstrue these as fresh food for the cooking it involves, the industry makes hay. 
Burgers and fries 
Advertisements affect people’s senses and stimulate responses such as craving to eat. In the long run, this becomes a habit, says Uday Sinha, a professor at the Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences, Delhi.
In a recent full-page newspaper advertisement, McDonald’s made a disparaging comment on freshly cooked home food. It said: “Stuck with Ghiya-Tori again? Make the 1+1 combo you love.” Even FSSAI called it an irresponsible advertisement as it was against the national efforts to promote the right eating habits, especially among children. Read along to know how healthy McDonald’s combo is. 

Eat one Chicken Maharaja Mac and your daily permissible salt intake is almost over in one go. It has 4.6 g salt, leaving only 10 per cent, or 0.4 g more for the entire day. The fat content is over half the prescribed daily limit for a meal.
A medium McDonald’s fries accounts for almost one-fifth of the daily fat need. The combo has an astounding 103 per cent salt, 72 per cent fat, 13 per cent trans fat and 33 per cent carbohydrate. 
Unsuspecting vegetarians are not any luckier. A vegetarian Cheese Whopper from Burger King will leave you with just over a fourth of the daily salt quota and less than half of that for fat. As its regular fries accounts for almost one-fifth of the daily fat need, adding it to a combo meal, stuffs you with just too much nutrients.
Burger, fries and fried chicken from KFC’s 5-in-1 classic zinger box would give 20 per cent more fat than the day’s quota along with very high levels of salt and trans fat.
“Food companies know that India is a naive market for junk food. A large population is unaware of nutrition and good food. Junk food is being made and sold in a manner that it is addictive,” says Vandana Prasad, a community paediatrician. So think twice before you choose that combo meal over home-cooked food.
Smaller burgers are cheap and attract people. But their contribution to RDA is big. KFC’s Veg Zinger with cheese can exhaust up to three-fourths of the daily salt brink and 45 per cent of the fat limit. Its Chicken Classic Zinger with cheese finishes over 80 per cent of fat and over 60 per cent of salt threshold. Burgers with cheese have more trans fats. 

Pizza, sandwich and wrap 
Pizza is considered a healthy fast food meal option because of the vegetables it comes with, but CSE lab results found it is loaded with salt and fat, and has high levels of trans fat.
It tested vegetarian and non-vegetarian pizzas from Domino’s and Pizza Hut along with one sachet of oregano seasoning it comes with. These were regular or personal pizzas meant to be consumed by one person.
Domino’s Non Veg Supreme has about 5 g salt, while Peppy Paneer cheese burst has only slightly less. So, no more space for salt from any other food, if these pizzas are consumed.
Non-veg Supreme also exhausts about three-fourths of the permissible fat. This also provides high levels of unhealthy trans fat — about one-third of the limit. Pizza Hut’s Chicken Supreme has more salt than one needs for the day.
Even the humble Classic Tomato Margherita from Pizza Hut can add over 50 per cent of the daily salt intake, 25 per cent of fat and about one-fourth of the trans fat limit. Excessive trans fat content in all pizzas that were tested is a cause for concern.
CSE lab tests also examined sandwiches, often perceived as healthy food for the raw vegetables it uses. But the result was disturbing. Salt, fat and trans fat content in sandwiches are as high as in pizzas.
 6-inch Subway Chicken Seekh Kabab sandwich has about 5 g salt, 39 g fat and 0.62 g trans fat. This is not just the amount of salt one can have in an entire day but also adds up to 65 per cent of the recommended fat levels and 28 per cent of trans fats.
Its vegetarian option, the Paneer Tikka sandwich, is not any healthier and exhausts over three-fourths of salt and fat limits, and one-fourth of trans fat limit. McDonald's Big Spicy Paneer Wrap will give you about 4 g of salt and 45 g of fat. 
Facts on trans fats 
Trans fats are deadly. Their intake must be avoided to prevent heart diseases. CSE found that most food companies either do not disclose or give more than the amount they declare.
Haldiram’s Classic Nut Cracker, for instance, had 4.6 times trans fat it claims to have. Fast food companies Domino’s and Subway do not mention trans fats at all on their website.
But all four of their samples that CSE tested had high trans fats. Burger King and KFC mention 0 g, suggesting no trans fats. That's not the case. Trans fats found in two pizza samples of Pizza Hut were higher than what the company declared.
“A diet high in trans fat can increase the risk of heart disease,” says Mithal of Medanta Hospital.
Clearly, companies are not bothered.
(Names of consumers have been changed to protect their identity)
Study by Mrinal Mallik, Arvind Singh Sengar and Rakesh Kumar Sondhiya Analysis by Amit Khurana and Sonal Dhingra

Fast food safe? Take it with pinch of salt

‘Dangerously high’ salt and fat content in samples
Samples of some food products, including chips, snacks and fries, contain amounts of transfat — a type of fat with detrimental health effects and not essential in diet — higher than their labelled values, the CSE also claimed.
Many packaged snacks and fast food products sold across the country have salt and fat levels higher than thresholds proposed by India’s food safety regulator, the non-government Centre for Science and Environment claimed on Tuesday, calling for red warning labels on them.
The CSE, which released its findings of salt and fat content in limited samples of several products, including burgers, French fries and noodles, has also alleged that the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has diluted labelling rules to favour the industry.
Samples of some food products, including chips, snacks and fries, contain amounts of transfat — a type of fat with detrimental health effects and not essential in diet — higher than their labelled values, the CSE also claimed.
“We have found dangerously high levels of salt and fat in the samples of packaged and fast food we tested,” Sunita Narain, the CSE’s director-general, said in a media release. “Consumers have a right to know what is contained in the package, but the FSSAI is dragging its feet and has not notified its own draft labelling regulation.”
The analysis, which tested 14 samples of packaged food and 19 samples of fast food, for instance, has found that salt levels in chips ranged from roughly two to five times the FSSAI’s proposed threshold of 0.25g per 100g. Samples of other packaged products tested contained two times to seven times the salt threshold.
Samples of burgers contained up to 1.5 times salt levels while fat levels ranged from 1.1 to 2.4 times the threshold value of 8g per 100g. A paneer tikka sandwich tested had 1.6 times salt and 2.3 times fat thresholds.
The CSE has claimed that the FSSAI, which had released draft regulations for food labelling in July 2018, has since then diluted labelling rules in fresh draft regulations released earlier this year.
The FSSAI did not immediately respond to a query from The Telegraph seeking reactions to the CSE’s claims.
The new draft regulations have replaced salt with sodium, total fat with saturated fat, and total sugar with added sugar. The CSE said salt was easier to understand than sodium, saturated fat addresses only one part of the problem, and added sugar made the threshold weaker.
“We’ve been waiting for the FSSAI to notify the regulations — it’s over 18 months since the 2018 draft,” said Amit Khurana, director for food safety at the CSE. It has also pointed out that the draft regulations do not specify the size and placement of the warning labels.
The CSE has called on the FSSAI to introduce red warning labels in line with “global best practices” on such snacks and fast food products whose salt or fat levels exceed the threshold values.

Fast food putting you at risk of heart attack

New Delhi: Most of the snacks, noodles and fast food items sold in the market contain higher than permissible limit of salt. In some cases, a study conducted by the Centre for Science and Environment showed, the salt content is three to five times the threshold set by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.
High salt intake, experts said, is a known cause for high blood pressure, which causes 57% of heart attack and 40% of stroke cases. “A small amount of salt on a daily basis — WHO recommends less than 5 grams per day per person — is essential for nerve and muscle function. But it is seen in India that people consume eight to nine grams of salt daily,” said an expert. 
FSSAI norms — drafted recently, but not notified yet — permit 0.25 gram of sodium per 100 grams of savoury snacks and instant noodles. For soups and fast foods, the threshold of salt is 0.35 gram per 100 grams.
CSE said tests showed one of the popular chips brands had 1 gram of salt content in 30 gram of chips. Among namkeens, one brand had salt content seven times the recommended threshold. Dr Sunita Narain, director of CSE, said they tested salt, fat, transfats and carbohydrates in 33 popular junk foods, which included 14 samples of chips, namkeen, instant noodles and soups and 19 samples of burgers, fries, fried chicken, pizza, sandwich and wraps.
The CSE director general said consumers have a right to know what is contained in the package, but FSSAI has not notified its own draft labelling regulation. Her comment refers to the delay in notifying the draft Food Safety Standards, (Labelling and Display) Regulations, which has been in preparation since 2013.
“The recommended dietary allowance of salt and fat is five grams and 60 grams respectively daily. However, we found that eating one burger sold by major brands exhaust anywhere between 62% to 82% of the recommended salt intake for the day and 82% to 120% of the recommended fat intake,” said Amit Khurana, programme director, food safety and toxins at CSE.
FSSAI said in a statement that it has been taking up the junk food regulations seriously and has already put up the draft notifications in public for comments.

Packaged foods breach safe limits of salt, fat: CSE study

Agency tested salt, fat, trans-fat and carbohydrates in 33 popular ‘junk foods’
An array of packaged snacks and fast foods breach safe limits of salt and fat content, says a laboratory analysis by the Centre for Science and Environment.
The agency tested salt, fat, trans-fat and carbohydrates in 33 popular “junk foods”, which consisted of 14 samples of chips, salted snacks, instant noodles and instant soup, and 19 samples of burgers, fries, fried chicken, pizzas, sandwiches and wraps. The samples were collected from grocery stores and fast food outlets in the city.
Daily ceiling
To calculate how unsafe the foods tested were, the organisation relied on the concept of the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) — a daily ceiling on the amount of salt, fat, carbohydrates and transfats. The RDA is based on scientific consensus and has been agreed upon by expert bodies such as the World Health Organisation, and the National Institute of Nutrition in India. It says that, ideally, no more than 5 gm of salt, 60 gm of fat, 300 gm carbohydrate and 2.2 gm of transfat should be consumed by an adult every day. Further, the RDA from each breakfast, lunch and dinner should be no more than 25%, and that from snacks no more than 10%.
The CSE found that given the size of the servings and the amount of nutrients per 100 gm, a single packet of packaged nuts, soup or noodles ended up having these salts and fats well over the recommended limits. For instance, Haldiram Aloo Bhujia, a popular savoury snack, with a serve size of 231 gm, had the equivalent of 7 gm of salt and 99 gm of total (saturated and unsaturated) fat. A single serving of the Nestle’s Maggi Masala (70 gm) exhausted 50% of the composite RDA for a snack, and a serving of Haldiram’s nut cracker exhausted 35% of the salt RDA and 26% of the fat RDA, the CSE analysis found.
Need to declare
According to the proposed draft Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations, packaged food companies will need to declare nutritional information such as calories (energy), saturated fat, trans-fat, added sugar and sodium per serve on the front of the pack. The food labels are also required to declare, per serve percentage contribution to RDA on the front of the pack. Though under discussions since 2015 and several drafts — the latest one came out in in July — these rules have yet to become law, and to be operationalised.
‘Red Octagon’
The CSE took the values prescribed in the drafts for their calculations and concluded that all of the popular snacks and fast foods ought to be displaying a ‘Red Octagon’, a warning symbol employed in packaged foods in Chile and Peru. The Red Octagon, which should be printed on the front of the pack, has a number and the name of the food component within that indicates how widely off the RDA a particular ingredient is. Thus a Red “3.1, Salt” on a pack of Lay’s India’s Magic Masala by PepsiCo indicates that the salt it contains is 3.1 times the RDA for snacks.
“What we have seen is that all of the packaged foods of the various brands we tested would be in the red. This is why the powerful food industry is opposing the notification,” said Sunita Narain, director general of CSE, at a press conference. The regulations, as they now stand, don’t apply to fast foods such as burgers and pizzas, even though they were included in the CSE analysis.

Packaged water bottles without expiry dates seized

Trichy: Food safety department staff seized four packaged drinking water cans that were found without expiry date in Pudukottai district on Tuesday.
Al-Hajee Aqua, a Pudukottai-based packaged drinking water company, which was supplying the cans, was booked under food safety and standards Act, 2006, for not registering their vehicle with the food safety department.
Every vehicle used for transporting foods material need to be registered with the food safety department. Officials from the food safety department intercepted the vehicle when they were supplying drinking water in the collector office premises on Tuesday. Designated officer from food safety department, Pudukkottai R Ramesh Babu said that the vehicle was summoned to the food safety office after it was found to be having cans without expiry dates.
“A total of four bubble top can with a capacity of 20liters were found without expiry dates. We have taken legal samples from those cans. A case was booked under section 58 of food safety and standards act, 2006 for registering the vehicle with food safety department,” he said.
Action will be initiated against the company if the water quality was not found within safety standards, he added.

Banned tobacco products, rotten fruits seized

Officials of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) conducted surprise checks in shops at Singanallur and seized banned tobacco products, rotten fruits and artificially coloured food products worth around ₹ 1.89 lakh late on Monday.
K. Tamilselvan, Designated Officer of FSSAI in Coimbatore, and food safety officers conducted simultaneous checks in 67 shops.
According to food safety officials, banned tobacco products of 100.5 kg were found in six shops during the raids. Notices were served on the owners of the shops.
The officials said that 16 out of the 67 shops inspected had not obtained the licence or the registration certificate from the food regulator.
Around 120 kg of rotten fruits, artificially coloured food products, expired packaged food products and banned plastic products worth ₹ 74,000 in total were also seized from the shops during the raids.
Warning
FSSAI warned that stringent action would be taken against those selling banned tobacco products in the vicinity of schools and colleges.
Licence and registration certificates of shops that were found selling or stocking banned tobacco products would also be suspended, the officials added.

Crackdown on shops selling unsafe food

Coimbatore: Food safety department officials on Monday seized expired and spoilt food from 16 eateries in the Singanallur bus stand. They also found six shops selling banned tobacco products.
The officials had checked petty shops, bakeries and restaurants located in and around the bus stand following the collector’s order. They seized 100.5kg banned tobacco products, including chewable tobacco, worth Rs 1,15,000 from six shops. 
“We also checked the quality of food sold by the eateries. We checked the use of plastic, artificial colouring agents and whether they were selling or using expired products,” said designated food safety officer K Tamilselvan.
The team found 16 shops flouting food safety norms. “Some shops were found selling chilli chicken that had banned colouring agents. Some were selling rotting fruits, artificially-ripened fruits including banana, spoilt halwa and chips. A few were found using plastic bags and straws,” Tamilselvan said.
The officials issued notices to the shops and warned of cancelling licenses if they repeat the offence.
The district administration will cancel the license of shops found selling tobacco products within 100 yards of educational institutions, sources added.

Awareness programme for food business operators held

‘There are around 6,000 licensed food operators in Madurai’
MADURAI
Food Safety Department organised a programme to create awareness of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2011, among food business operators (FBOs), here on Tuesday.
M. Somasundaram, Designated Officer for Food Safety, Madurai district, addressed the FBOs on the importance and ways of procuring a licence under the Act. “Currently, there are around 6,000 licensed food operators in the city. Through such programmes we are sensitising them that obtaining licences for their businesses is mandatory under the Act,” he said.
Over 100 FBOs from across various sectors took part in the programme. There was widespread use of used cooking oil by hotels and eateries across the district and this issue had to be addressed, said Mr. Somasundaram. The department had launched an initiative, Repurpose Used Cooking Oil (RUCO), to recover used oil from vendors and the food industry. The department was also paying ₹25 for every litre of used oil. The oil purchased this way will be used for the production of biodiesel,” he said.
He also said that edible oil, which was not packed, was prohibited for sale under the Act. Packing toys or gifts with food products for infants was also not permissible.
“The cold press oil produced in the city has not been meeting the standards prescribed under the Act. So, the manufacturers must collectively petition the Chief Executive Officer in the department for a solution,” he said.
During an interaction with the Designated Officer, the participants discussed their problems. “Most of the FBOs in the district don’t understand the Act and are unconsciously violating the law. These programmes provide a platform to address this issue,’ he said.

Dec 17, 2019

DINAMALAR NEWS


DINAMALAR NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAMALAR NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


Bengaluru: Central Jail inmates could soon be given safe and hygienic food


BENGALURU: No excess sugar, salt or oil. Fresh, healthy food with plenty of veggies and sprouts. Central Jail at Parappana Agrahara could soon become an Eat Right campus certified by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). 

Eat Right is a training and audit mechanism to ensure food produced and consumed is safe, hygienic, sustainable and healthy. A campus selected under this initiative must meet four parameters (see box) and the same is rated on a five-star mechanism.
If certified, the state's largest jail, which houses several VIP inmates, will be the second prison complex in India to earn the title after Tihar, where the certification process is under way. "FSSAI chairperson Rita Teaotia who recently visited Bengaluru, discussed the Eat Right programme with various stakeholders, including representatives from Central Jail. Jail representatives said it was heartening to note that prisons too were being considered as potential campuses as jail inmates are usually neglected. They said 5,000 inmates from low socio-economic background could benefit from this initiative. Since then, we have been working on the licensing/registration process. We will soon begin training, followed by an audit framework," said Ruchika Sharma, media coordinator, FSSAI. 
We've had an initial round of talks. While the area of food preparation is somewhat streamlined, our challenge is at the consumption level. With the jail having a floating population, there is no proper process to make the inmates aware of healthy eating habits. As most of them are from under-privileged background, they do not understand the importance and value of a balanced and nutritious diet. All these concerns need to be addressed," said Dr Uma M, chief medical officer, central prison, Bengaluru.
According to FSSAI, in May-June 2019, 950 inmates at Tihar jail were trained in these healthy food practices. While the department of food safety, New Delhi, has made it mandatory to deploy a food safety supervisor in its prison complex, it has also proposed to build a food-safety testing laboratory in future. Tihar jail houses 32 kitchens and two manufacturing units which prepare food for almost 40,000 people.

FSSAI intervenes as dispute over denition of ice cream heats up

Kollam: A dispute over the denition of ice cream has risen between two camps of sweet and dessert manufacturers in Kollam district of Kerala. Though the matter was dragged into a court here, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has intervened as it remained unresolved. The central food safety regulator is all set to dene an ice cream and explain what all goes into or doesn't go into its making. 
The feud was triggered after a group of companies demanded that frozen desserts should also be allowed to be labelled as ice creams. However, the rival group is contending that products which are not made by using dairy fat should not put under the ice cream category. 
Ice cream is prepared by using primary ingredients milk or milk solid, sugar, and ice crystals. Dairy fat would be added to these. However, some companies add vegetable fat instead of dairy fat. Their demand is to include desserts that use vegetable oil also in the category of ice cream. However, the companies that make ice cream using dairy fat have objected to this. 
Thus, the FSSAI has intervened to resolve the dispute. An expert committee was formed to dene the ice cream. Though the committee met, its members have sought more time to take a final decision.
As per the norms frozen sweets should have a label, clearly making the dairy fat, vegetable oil and protein products.

Dec 15, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


Government waives fee for food adulteration test

  • Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has authorised credible voluntary consumer organisations (VCOs) to assist consumers in getting such tests done
  • To overcome the problems, the FSSAI has said, testing fees will now be reimbursed, even if the consumer sample does not fail

New Delhi: Doubtful about quality of a food product? You can now get the sample checked in government designated food laboratories free of cost.
The apex food regulator, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has authorised credible voluntary consumer organisations (VCOs) to assist consumers in getting such tests done.
Currently, in India food safety law provides for reimbursement of testing fees only if a consumer sample fails. According to the government, this provision has however never been used due to some practical difficulties.
To overcome the problems, the FSSAI has said, testing fees will now be reimbursed, even if the consumer sample does not fail.
The food regulator has authorised 80 VCOs to facilitate the testing process.
The VCOs will create a nationwide network of consumer organisations for food safety and nutrition (NetCOFaN) with the support of FSSAI.
“The tests will be done only through pre-selected consumer organisations and limited numbers. We will try it with a few credible consumer organisations first and then scale it up," Pawan Agarwal, CEO, FSSAI told Mint.
“Consumer organisations will be linked to identified labs and tests will only be done at those labs," he said.
NetCOFaN will initially work in three specific areas, i.e. awareness and training, mobilization of small and petty food businesses for various schemes, and food testing and surveillance.
The network will also use content on food safety and nutrition by FSSAI with their ground level contacts for awareness and training programmes by localizing it.
On-ground presence of VCOs will help reach the messages to local areas across the country. Support of VCOs will also be taken to mobilize small and petty food businesses to participate in hygiene rating, cluster certification and food safety training and certification (FoSTaC) programmes.
VCOs will be provided with ‘Food Safety Magic Box’ that has over 100 simple do-it-yourself tests for common adulterants and a kit for testing in mid-day meal scheme.
“Creation of network would help to build synergies amongst them and is very innovative way of FSSAI in reaching out to the consumers across the country," said Pushpa Girimaji, an expert on consumer issues.
Starting the process, FSSAI has partnered with Delhi-based Consumer Voice to check safety and quality of milk products in Delhi NCR, for which it has collected samples of paneer, khoya and desi ghee and other milk products.
These samples were coded by Consumer Voice and tested in FSSAI’s National Food Laboratory at Ghaziabad. The results of this surveillance would be compiled soon and shared with concerned stakeholders. Preventive and corrective action, if needed, would then be initiated jointly by Consumer Voice and the State food authorities.
Evidence based point system has been put in place to monitor work of VCOs and they would be provided token funding based on of activities to ensure sustainability and continuity.
FSSAI had earlier asked top-200 food companies to appoint nodal persons for consumer grievances. These persons have been trained for effective consumer grievance redressal. FSSAI is now looking at ways of using services of VCOs in effective redressal of consumer grievances.

Now, food quality can be tested in government-designated laboratory free of cost

NEW DELHI: Unsure about quality of your food? You can now get the sample tested in a government-designated food laboratory free of cost.
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has authorised voluntary consumer organisations (VCOs) to assist consumers in getting such tests done and also waive the existing fee for it.
At present, the food safety law provides for reimbursement of testing fees only if a consumer sample fails. However, the regulator feels the fees is a factor why consumer hesitate to bring samples for testing.
FSSAI said provisions have now been introduced to reimburse testing fees even if the consumer sample does not fail.
The food regulator has authorised 80 VCOs to facilitate the testing process. These organisations will create a nationwide network of consumer organisations for food safety and nutrition (NetCOFaN) with the support of FSSAI. These consumer organisations will be linked to identified labs and tests will only be done at those labs, the regulator said.
The network will also use content on food safety and nutrition by FSSAI with their ground level contacts for awareness and training programmes by localizing it.
On-ground presence of VCOs will help take messages to local areas across the country. Support of VCOs will also be taken to mobilize small and petty food businesses to participate in hygiene rating, cluster certification and food safety training and certification programmes, FSSAI said.

Dec 14, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAMANI NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


Food or drug? Government to take a call soon

 
NEW DELHI: Is a multivitamin preparation a drug or just plain old food? And what about pick-me-ups like Revital or supplements like Ferradol? Given the confusing proliferation of products, the government is looking to arrive at an answer by changing the regulatory framework. 
It appears the solution will be broadly along these lines: If the ingredients of a particular product are below that determined as the daily dosage, or 1RDA (Recommended Dietary Allowance), then it will be deemed ‘food’ and regulated by the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), according to people with knowledge of the matter and documents that ET has seen. Anything above that will be a ‘drug’ and regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics (D&C) Act. 1RDA is defined as the level of nutrients to be consumed daily to meet all the requirements of a healthy individual. At a recent meeting between the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) and the FSSAI, which administers the FSSA, it was decided that multivitamin preparations containing vitamins in a strength lower than 1RDA would be excluded from the D&C Act. The Act will be amended so that vitamins and minerals below 1RDA for prophylactic purpose are deleted from Schedule V. 
“Prophylactic levels of vitamins and minerals equal to or less than 1 RDA as specified by ICMR, may be regulated under FSSA and its rules,” FSSAI told the DCGI in a November 21letter, asking it to make the necessary amendments in the D&C Act. 
Most companies prefer to position their products as health supplements under the FSSA to avoid the more onerous D&C Act regime, which could also invite price controls. The ambiguity stems from multivitamin preparations being covered by both the D&C Act and by the FSSA. Taking advantage of this overlap, companies had started seeking approval of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to circumvent price controls and tighter regulation. “There is an apparent regulatory overlap of FSSA and D&C Act since multivitamin composition of certain products are, in fact, used for both prevention of diseases as well as providing health benefits,” said a senior government official on condition of anonymity.
For example, Abbott’s product Limcee Plus, which was approved by FSSAI in January 2018 in the health supplement category, costs Rs 60 for a strip of 15 tablets. On the other hand, its chewable vitamin tablet Limcee, on the national list of essential medicines since 2013, costs Rs 14 for a strip of 15 tablets. The company says Limcee Plus contains amino acids and thus doesn’t just target patients who suffer from vitamin C deficiency. 
The DCGI and FSSAI had earlier this year approached the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) to review prophylactic doses mentioned under Schedule V and Schedule K of the D&C Act vis-a-vis the doses prescribed under the FSSA with an intent to avoid confusion. 

VACB finds Food Safety staff-hoteliers nexus

Officers reluctant to register complaints, violations never reach trial stage
The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) on Friday said endemic corruption in the Food Safety wing had brought the State to the brink of a public health crisis.
The agency, which conducted a surprise inspection of Food Safety offices in the State, said that inspectors accepted bribes and rarely sent food samples collected from outlets for chemical examination. They appeared reluctant to register complaints from the public or record them in registers and give acknowledgement receipts to petitioners. Citizens who sought information on action taken on their appeals were turned away harshly.
Director General, VACB, Anil Kanth had ordered the inspections code-named Operation Jeevan after a family was laid low recently consuming stale food from a popular latenight eatery here.
Investigators said that Food Safety inspectors routinely buried damning food safety analysis reports to save favoured hoteliers in exchange of sizeable backhander payments.
In many cases, food safety officials did little to remove banned food products from supermarket shelves.
The agency said corrupt officials ensured that food safety violation never reached the trial stage. They saved the accused by letting them off with minor fines.
Records fudged
Food safety officials who detected persons responsible for food contamination rarely prosecuted them. They fudged records and accepted bribes to protect the offenders.
In many cases, officials laid down a smokescreen by conducting make-believe inspections at predictable places and timings.
They often saved violators by insulating them from criminal prosecution and restored the food permits secretly days after they annulled them publicly.
In Varkala, the VACB found that inspectors had only sent eight out of the 101 stale food samples seized from various outlets for food safety tests.
The office had taken no action on 23 complaints received from tourists about food sold in the tourist resort area.
In Thiruvananthapuram, the VACB found that the Assistant Commissioner, Food Safety, had taken no action on 78 complaints. The situation was the same in food safety offices in other districts.
An investigator said hoteliers paid food safety inspectors to inform them earlier about food safety raids.

FSSAI mulls cattlefeed norms to curb animal food contamination

Animal feed and fodder are turning out to be a major source of contaminant of foods of animal origin - The Hindu
For now, feed/fodder to conform to BIS standards
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is looking at bringing in standards for animal feed so as to curb contaminants, pesticides and heavy metals finding their way into foods of animal origin through feed and fodder.
Till the time these regulations are finalised, the FSSAI has directed that cattlefeed materials must conform to norms set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS).
Six-month breather
“In order to address the issue on an interim basis, it has been decided that commercial feeds/feed materials intended for food producing animals shall comply with the relevant BIS standards and shall not be manufactured, imported, distributed and sold except under the Bureau of Indian Standards certification,” the directive said. Stakeholders have been given six months to comply with the directive, which will come into force in June.
Noting that animal feed and fodder are turning out to be a major source of contaminants of foods of animal origin, it said, “regulatory control to ensure quality and safety of animal feed and silage is urgently needed.”
According to the findings of the National Milk and Quality Survey, 2018, traces of contaminants such as Aflatoxin M1 have been found not just in raw milk supplied by unorganised players but also in processed milk supplied by organised players; feed and fodder are the cuiprit. The food safety authority had said that the presence of Aflatoxin M1 residues beyond permissible limits in processed milk is a serious concern.
In its action plan for safe and quality milk and milk products, the FSSAI believes that “regulatory values or recommendations through legislation can limit animal exposure through feed ingestion against the presence of residues of mycotoxins in animal-derived products.”
The regulator has also said that it will be putting in systemic efforts to improve animal husbandry practices to address safety and quality concerns over milk.
The FSSAI, in collaboration with the Ministry of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries along with the National Dairy Development Board, will work towards enhancing awareness on improved animal husbandry and farm practices among small dairy farmers.

FSSAI inks MoU with Nasscom to prevent food wastage

New Delhi, Dec 13 (KNN) Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Nasscom foundation to develop an app and set up a 24×7 helpline number to connect donors with surplus eatables with food distribution organisations.
“India will soon have access to a common help-line and a mobile application ‘Food Donation in India’ to donate food to the needy. FSSAI and NASSCOM Foundation have signed a MoU today to jointly build a technology platform for Food Donation in India,” FSSAI said in a statement.
The platform will also facilitate registration of surplus food distribution organisations, and initially, the network of 81 such organizations across PAN India, known as the Indian Food Sharing Alliance (IFSA) will be a part of this platform, it said. The solution, FSSAI said, will provide an easy accessible platform that will cater to different stakeholders like food businesses, hoteliers, caterers, individuals etc and facilitate food donations in any part of the country.
FSSAI CEO Pawan Agarwal said that this would definitely provide a recognition to the organisations involved in surplus food distribution and would help in reducing the wastage of food in the country through food donation.
On the other hand, Ashok Pamidi, CEO, Nasscom Foundation said the collaboration is a significant step in the direction of leveraging tech for solutions and the foundation hopes more such engagements in future.

Visible food safety violations to attract spot fine from now on

Visible violations by Food Business Operators (FBOs) are expected to see a decline with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) all set to start levying spot fines.
As per a new directive, Designated Officers of the FSSAI in each district can now impose spot fine on FBOs who are found with certain visible violations.
While violation for the first and second time attracts fine, repetition of the same violation for a third time will attract a higher amount of fine and cancellation of the registration certificate issued by the food regulator.
The spot fine is also expected to have an impact on the sale of banned products like gutka as seizure of any such item for a third time will attract cancellation of registration certificate and a spot fine of ₹ 25,000, the highest fine among all violations.
K. Tamilselvan, Designated Officer of FSSAI for Coimbatore, said that the spot fine system was expected to have a deterrent effect on FBOs that repeatedly flouted food safety norms.
“The new directive empowers Designated Officers to levy spot fine when a food is found containing extraneous matter, FBOs failing to comply with directions of food safety officers, unhygienic or unsanitary processing or manufacturing and sale of food items,” he said.
FBOs, who are slapped with a spot fine, will have to pay the amount at the treasury and food safety officers cannot collect the penalty as cash. If the FBOs fail to pay the penalty within the stipulated time, the Designated Officer can suspend the registration certificate of the FBO until the penalty is paid.
According to Dr. Tamilselvan, misbranding, label violations, possession of banned food products and adulteration in certain food items are among the common visible violations found in Coimbatore.
“The spot fine applies to the possession of banned food item like gutka when the seized quantity is less than that of the sample quantity. Sample quantity means the quantity required to lift four separate samples of the same item for laboratory analysis. Now, even if a vendor is found with two or three sachets of different gutka, spot fine can be levied,” he explained.
Stating that levy of spot fine would have a deterrent effect on violators, Coimbatore-based lawyer and consumer rights activist V.P. Sarathi said that the food safety officers should also strictly implement other provisions of the FSSAI Act to bring down other violations by FBOs.
Citing an incident wherein he found worm in a packaged drinking water a year ago, sample of which was subsequently found “unfit for human consumption” in a laboratory analysis, Mr. Sarathi said that the food regulator only served a ‘caution notice’ to the manufacturer.
“Such offences should have seen a logical end of prosecution by the court and heavy fine should have been imposed on the violator,” he opined.
A meat stall owner with whom spoke to said that the spot fine would not affect traders, who sold quality meat to customers, but would help buyers understand those who sold sub-standard items.