Jul 14, 2014

Adulteration in Food Items

The primary responsibility of the enforcement of the Food Safety and Standards Act lies with the State / UT Governments. As per the information received from the State/UT Governments, 46283 food samples including milk/milk products, edible vegetable Oil, spice etc. were analysed. Out of these, 9265 food samples were found to be adulterated and misbranded during the year 2013-14. The State wise details showing the number of cases registered / challenged and cases in which prosecution has been launched and the number of convictions for the last three years is given below:

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT REGARDING NUMBER PROSECUTION LAUNCHED AND CONVICTIONS/PENALTIES DURING LAST THREE YEARS
S. No.
Name of the State/U.T
2011-12
2012-2013
2013-2014

No. of Prosecution
Launched (Criminal/
Civil)

No. of Convictions/ Penalties

No. of Prosecution
Launched (Criminal/
Civil)

No. of Convictions/ Penalties

No. of Prosecution
Launched (Criminal/
Civil)

No. of Convictions/ Penalties

1
Andhra Pradesh
342
56
286
49/Rs.5,50,000
0
18/ Rs. 14500
2
A & N Islands
0
0
0
0
617
39,94,385
3
Arunachal Pradesh
6
4
11
2/ Rs 3100
9
9/Rs. 6,33,000
4
Assam
N.A
N.A
31
16/ Rs.2,45,000
26
0
5
Bihar
251
0
249
3
90
14/Rs. 2,26,000
6
Chandigarh
64 (PFA)
124 (PFA)
7
0
11
3
7
Chhattisgarh
39
15
111
41
56
7/ Rs. 3,49,000
8
Dadra & N.H.
0
0
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A.
9
Daman & Diu
4
0
0
2
N.A
N.A
10
Delhi
70
0
PFA- 6
FSSA- 44
62
61
15,73,000
11
Goa
13
0
14
1/Rs. 20,000
15
2/Rs. 27000
12
Gujarat
92 (PFA)
0 (FSSA)
13 (PFA)
0 (FSSA)
46
7/Rs. 97500
N.A
N.A.
13
Haryana
N.A
N.A
131
60
260
166/ Rs.26,61,800
14
Himachal Pradesh
437
25
53
13
23
7/ Rs 7 lakh
15
Jammu & Kashmir
126
12
488
288/ Rs. 1.82,47,685
N.A
N.A.
16
Jharkhand
53
0
91
0
99
8/Rs 22,07,000
17
Karnataka
35
3
29
85
N.A
N.A.
18
Kerala
N.A
N.A
0
Rs. 1,63,280
5
43/ Rs. 4,89,500
19
Lakshadweep
0
0
N.A
N.A.
N.A
N.A.
20
Madhya Pradesh
1948
415
1183
844
N.A
N.A.
21
Maharashtra
677
74
114
888/Rs. 82,99,485
2557
66/Rs. 4176500
22
Manipur
N.A
N.A
N.A.
0
N.A
N.A.
23
Meghalaya
0
0
N.A.
N.A.
6
N.A.
24
Mizoram
There is no Food Laboratory
25
Nagaland
N.A
N.A
0
0
N.A
N.A.
26
Orissa
N.A
N.A
0
0
N.A
N.A.
27
Puducherry
0
0
N.A
N.A.
N.A
N.A.
28
Punjab
N.A
N.A
304
92
203
80
29
Rajasthan
N.A
N.A
0
295
N.A
N.A.
30
Sikkim
FSO is not appointed to collect the samples.
31
Tamil Nadu
0
0
48
2
48
16/ Rs. 659800
32
Tripura
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A.
N.A
N.A.
33
Uttar Pradesh
5026
453
2551
1010/Rs 3,70,96,600
2930
1919/ Rs.4,47,84, 400
34
Uttarakhand
53
14
134
55/Rs. 22,44,001
122
Rs. 5,06,489
35
West Bengal
0
0
N.A.
N.A.
N.A
N.A
36
Telangana
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
 Source: State/UT Governments N. A= Not Available
Some cases of food- borne disease out- breaks have been detected. The Government of India has initiated Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) with the aim to detect and respond to disease outbreaks. Further, the regular surveillance, monitoring & sampling of food products is undertaken by State /UT Governments under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 to curb the problem of food adultretation. Instructions in this regard are issued by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India from time to time. Random Samples of food items are drawn by the State Food Safety Officers and sent to the laboratories recognised by FSSAI for analysis. In cases where samples are found to be not conforming to the provisions of the Act and the Rules & Regulations made thereunder, penal action is initiated against of offender.
The Health Minister was replying to a question in the Lok Sabha here today.

No comments:

Post a Comment