May 27, 2016

CHAT - Nitin Sethi - SUBJECT: Does the rot in Indian food safety system spread beyond breads and buns?

Senior Associate Editor, Business Standard

For exporting foods to developed world, Indian producers face stiff quality standards, often face rejection of lots. However, is there a similar stringent check on imports? We can see so many processed/semi-processed foods in Indian shops, (often even without details of mfg plant).
Ujjwal, you got it spot on. We are supposed to test exports and imports of food products, both. Our quality testing on exports is lax and our quality testing for imports is far worse. The govt recently appointed more than 100 unqualified customs officers as food safety officers at ports to check food imports. Anywhere else this would have been a scandal. We have never invested in building the food safety regulatory system and the government is now in a phase of further diluting the limited capacities.

Are we reactionary in how we look at food safety in India rather than being preventive?
Ravi our preventive capacities are near zero at the moment. A general lack of confidence that govt is ensuring food safety leads to the over-blown reactions i think at time.

Could you please give examples of how the government is now in a phase of further diluting the limited capacities of our food safety regulatory system? Also, what are the major areas that we need to urgently invest on to build a robust system?
The NDA government has shelved the earlier plans of expanding food safety enforcement systems. Initially it had proposed Rs 1,800 cr plan to do so across the country. Now the food safety authority, FSSAI is proposing that it shall not be involved in enforcement of the food safety law across the country at all! It has already wound down two of its offices, one in UP and another in Punjab. It plans to let pvt sector labs get in the business - and we all know how problematic that can be. It is willing to let even state officers enforce the food safety law as an additional duty and not as a full time task, which means we wont have trained officers doing it but just another official. Oddly, all this is being done in a rather hush hush manner. On what we should be doing: bring transparency to the system. Put all testing results, recalls etc online for consumers to know. Enhance our enforcement capacities for centre and state - train people and give them jobs as regulators. set up our independent labs across regions to test food products - especially processed food. To put it simply, we got a new law in 2011 but we were only at the verge of implementing it when the govt has instead began to shrink the enforcement ability of the regulator

In food safety, it is always said that our traditional home cooked food is the best and consumption of processed food should be limited, if not possible to avoid. But, regarding the most basic ingredients of cooked food i.e. water and vegetables, I have doubts about their being consumable and uncontaminated. And if there exist an already remedial mechanism, how do one go ahead if these basic ingredients are contaminated with pesticides and heavy metals
Varun, Our bodies are capable of taking different unsafe chemicals to some extent. This is how the food safety systems work. Experts assess what kind of foods we get our nutrition from - say rice, bread, lentils, meants etc - in a way what makes up your average food intake. Separately the assess how much of each dangerous chemical human body in different conditions can be ok with. Based on that they set up standards on what should be the maximum level of these bad substances can be permitted in different foods so that overall in a day we dont consumer more than the dangerous level. So i would say this, while our traditional foods will contain some harmful materials as well, i would rather have that than the harmful materials from processed food because at least i am getting a healthy diet that keeps my immune system working and body fit. Of course there are some dangerous chemicals that should not be present at all in our foods and the govt sets standards demanding so. The case of finding bromate in bread by CSE is one such example. The chemical should have been simply banned to begin with. I hope i answered your query

Consumer awareness on matters of safety of packaged foods is quite low and people are just not motivated enough to actually mobilize on this issue. This is also because there is no confidence in the safety standards set. Do people even know which ministry and which minister is supposed to deal with food safety. Why don' the concerned ministries don't speak up often enough?
Harsha, the concerned ministry is the Health and Family Welfare ministry. The food safety authority under it is FSSAI (http://www.fssai.gov.in/). Unfortunately the two have been extremely lax in actually doing much with transparency. Being a specialised area the onus on the authority should be much higher to act transparently and pro-actively. But that has not been the case. I would say the pressure from processed food industry is pretty high on most times. People would be more than motivated, I am sure, if the FSSAI began informing public of all the tests they are doing and what they are finding. Other countries such as US does this transparently and that brings awareness in public as well as mobilised people for public health.

When we have street vendors selling food, disregarding all standards of hygiene and safety, when can we truly have safe and healthy food standards?
This is the way I see it: There is a larger problem of hygiene and safe water etc that is wide-spread. The govt cant/wont guarantee that at the moment. The street vendors are provided no economic or other support to do any better and operate at very low margins. There are issues of hygiene and safety consequently. On the other hand are large profit-making businesses of processed and manufactured foods that have no excuse for not providing safe food products to consumers. Their desire to cut corners and serve cheap and dangerous additives or untested or unhealthy contents or making spurious claims of health impacts of their products should be unpardonable. I would treat the latter with a much more stringent set of norms while investing in the marginal and small vendors to help them provide better foods

Recently we saw that the govt. shut two regional FSSAI offices (in Lucknow and Chandigarh). Given that these offices were involved in the run-in with Patanjali and Nestle, do you think this was due to corporate influence? And how harmful is to the food regulatory regime to send this kind of message?
The shutting down of the two offices has a bad smell about it. There is no proof that i can quote to make an accusation though. Regardless of whether there was direct influence or not, the fact that the two offices were shut down should set off alarm bells. Why? Because under Indian food safety laws only these regional centres of the FSSAI can license food businesses and manufacturers of certain categories. If they are not there in the field then who is checking all these manufacturing facilities before giving the licenses? Say, any manufacturer that has units producing in more than two states can only be governed by the central authority. that would mean most of the big food manufacturers. you are right, it sends a very bad signal to consumers and a very positive signal to bad businesses.

I have another question. Isn't this issue similar to the car air bag issue where consumers are more price conscious than safety conscious. Is health/safety really an issue for people here. There was more outrage at Maggi's ban rather than the presence of lead in it. As opposed to this, the consumer rights scene is much more developed and many fight pro actively to enforce their rights. Couldn't there be or shouldn't there be greater synergy between consumer affairs ministry and HFW in this matter?
we are unfortunately being pushed in to a direction towards self-regulation for food safety of products as well just as it often happens in the automotive industry in India. and that is dangerous. Yes, you are right there should be more synergy between the two.

Do Indian central and state regulators have the man-power to monitor food safety standards closely? What steps would you propose?
Ankita, to put it simply: NO. Worse still, the govt is now proposing to whittle down the existing man-power further. Take a look at my answer to Kanika here for what needs to be done.

Advertising watchdog raps Patanjali ad claims

The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has rapped yoga guru Baba Ramdev's Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. for "false and misleading" advertisements that also "denigrate" rival products.
The Consumer Complaints Council (CCC) of the ad watchdog, which has released a statement on the complaints it dealt with in March, also found three of Patanjali's product advertisements indulging in "ambiguity" and making claims that were described as "gross exaggeration".
The CCC received 156 complaints against ads during the month, and upheld 90 - including those by Patanjali - under categories such as "education", "healthcare and personal care", "food and beverages" and others.
Under the "healthcare and personal care" category, the CCC pulled up the ad for Patanjali Kesh Kanti Natural Hair Cleanser & Oil, describing as "false and misleading by ambiguity" and "gross exaggeration" its claim that "mineral oil is carcinogenic in nature and may cause cancer".
In the "food and beverages" segment, it found that the ad for 'Patanjali Kachi Ghani Mustard Oil' made claims that were "misleading" and "not substantiated".
The ad had claimed that, "Other than Kacchi Ghani process most of the other edible refined oils and mustard oil are made using neurotoxin Hexagon solvent extraction process. To make profits at the cost of consumers' health many companies mix cheap palm oil in mustard oil".
The CCC ruled that the ad "unfairly denigrates other oils/mustard oil".
The ad had prompted the edible oil industry body, the Solvent Extractors Association of India (SEAI), to file complaints with the food regulator, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and ASCI.
In its letters to FSSAI and ASCI, the SEAI requested the regulators to "take action" against Patanjali, and alleged that the company's ad for 'Kacchi Ghani Mustard Oil' was not in good taste.
The CCC also found issues with the ad for 'Patanjali Herbal Washing Powder, Cake and Dishwash Bar', which claimed they were used by "millions of housewives". The watchdog said the claim was "not substantiated".
It further said that there was little evidence of the cleaning benefit of its professed ingredients, and declared the claim as "misleading by ambiguity".
The CCC also said that "the claim, 'Dish wash bars made with chemicals do clean the utensils but they end up damaging the hands', was not substantiated and unfairly denigrates dish wash bars directly".
Patanjali's ads have come in for criticism in the past. In a recent article, Pushpa M. Bhargava, former vice chairman of the National Knowledge Commission, made a detailed critique of the claims made by a Baba Ramdev ad about treatments for high blood pressure and diabetes.
Bhargava, who founded the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, described as "scientifically absurd" the "implication in the ad that blood pressure and diabetes are caused by viruses".

Toxic chemical test result of Goa’s pão  on Monday

PANAJI: Goans will know for sure by Monday whether the bread they eat is free from poisonous, cancer causing chemicals. Director of Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Bambolim, Salim Veljee said that the laboratory report on the presence of potassium bromate and potassium iodate in bread and bakery products is expected to be out on May 30. The report will reveal whether the local bread is safe for consumption, he said.
“Since May 23, when news broke out that bread in New Delhi contained potentially harmful chemicals, our food inspectors have collected bread samples from various bakers, patisseries, cafes and grocery stores in the state. The analysis of the samples will be out on Monday,” said Veljee.
There was no instruction from FDA Bhavan or higher authorities in the government to check the safety of local bread but our office is doing it anyway, said Veljee.
Meanwhile, members of the All Goa Bakers Association (AGBA) said that none of them use any harmful additives to make bread.
President of AGBA Agapito Menezes said, “Our ‘poders’ have not even heard of these chemicals. The cost of ‘pao’ is only Rs three. How can they afford these chemicals?” “Goan bakers – ‘poders’ and local bakeries – bake bread traditionally and do it two or three times a day. They don’t need to use chemical preservatives because they do not have excess production,” he pointed out.
There are about 1,200 bakers in Goa of which about 300 are members of AGBA, but Menezes said that he was confident that bread in the state is healthy and free from toxic chemicals. Ravindra Gaitonde, partner, Café Central, Panaji, said that their bread is absolutely natural and free from any preservative. “We need to file a defamation suit against the report because it cannot generalise on quality and create doubt in the minds of people,” he said.
An owner of a Panaji-based pastry chain said that the only ingredients that go into the making of bread are yeast, flour, salt, oil and sugar. No harmful chemicals are used, she said. A commercial sandwich bread manufacturer said that even large bakers do not use any chemicals in production.
New Delhi’s Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a research organisation, released a study that found potassium bromate – a possible cancer-causing chemical – in 38 samples of popular bread brands in the national capital city. The study also found the presence of potassium iodate, a thyroid inducer. Both chemicals are used as additives to soften bread.
Usage of chemical is permitted up to limits of 50 ppm (parts per million) of bromate in bread. However, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has now decided to remove potassium bromate from the list of additives and is studying the usage of potassium iodate.

Bread manufacturers withdraw use toxic chemicals, cite public controversy

Centre also tested and found residues of the chemicals in buns and pizza bases in major fast food chains
Under a harsh spotlight after a damning report on carcinogenic toxins in bread, the All India Bread Manufacturers Association announced they were 'voluntarily withdrawing' the use of the chemicals potassium bromate and iodate. This comes on the heels of both the central government and the Food safety and standards authority of India (FSSAI) taking serious note of the report put out by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).
The CSE report that came out on May 23, found that 84 per cent of the 38 commonly available brands of pre-packaged breads, and pavs and buns, contained potassium bromate and iodate. The Centre also tested and found residues of the chemicals in buns and pizza bases in fast food chains such as Domino's, McDonald's, Subway.
President of the AIBMA Ramesh Mago, told the press on Thursday that they were withdrawing the these chemicals due the public controversy. However the association said that the FSSAI had so far permitted the use of potassium bromate/iodate as food additives till the limit of 50 parts per million (ppm). The CSE report found all resides to be below the limit. Adil Hassan, MD of Harvest Gold, and member of All India Bread Manufacturers' Association, said, "Potassium bromate and potassium iodate are considered safe and legal and also approved for widespread use by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India and even the USFDA. However, given that potassium bromate has become a controversial subject and causing confusion among consumers, we have decided to voluntary withdraw use of the additives in the products."
However, the report had called on the FSSAI to ban the chemicals altogether, as they had been in many countries, such as across the European Union and Canada, as potassium bromate/iodate have known to be potentially carcinogenic since the 1990s.
Taking serious note of the study, the union health ministry on May 23 itself asked the FSSAI to probe the issue and submit a report. FSSAI too soon recommended a ban on potassium bromate/iodate as food additives.
Industry representatives are not happy with CSE however. In a statement, ASSOCHAM said,"NGOs are free to be watchdogs, but they must realise that their reports and findings should not be targeted only at the industry... While the government is trying to move towards ease of doing business by relaxing the inspector raj, the NGO policing may harm many times."
CSE welcomes AIBMA's decision The CSE welcomed the bread manufacturers' decision to stop the use of potassium bromate and potasium iodate as additives, saying this will reduce public health risk from cancer-causing chemicals.
"We have heard what the bread-making association has announced. We are happy that they have decided to stop using potassium bromate and potassium iodate within two-three days. This will reduce public health risk from these chemicals," Deputy Director General, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), Chandra Bhushan, said. CSE researchers had pointed out that potassium bromate can possibly cause cancer and use of potassium iodate in bread- making can lead to excess intake of iodine which could affect thyroid functions.

A long-term route to organic farming


Govt. opts for long-term route to switch over to organic farming
The government is embarking on a programme to bring down the use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers, under plans to enhance agricultural production and tap the export market. Agriculture Minister V.S. Sunil Kumar told The Hindu here on Thursday that the government would prefer the long-term route to switch over to organic farming.
Outlining the government’s objective to make Kerala a pesticide-free State, the Minister said a research and development programme would be taken up by the Agriculture Department and Kerala Agricultural University. “Branded organic products would help us tap a greater share of the export market and fetch a higher price for our produce.” A project initiated by the previous UDF government to convert Kerala into a fully organic State by 2016 had been bogged down after the pilot phase was implemented in Kasaragod last year. The United Arab Emirates had recently imposed tighter controls on the import of mango, cucumber, and chilli peppers from India. The country has made it mandatory for Indian exporters to produce a pesticide residue analysis report for import of these items. The latest report of the pesticide residue analysis lab under the KAU has revealed that most of the vegetables sold through markets stalls in Thiruvananthapuram, Pathanamthitta, and Kasaragod pesticide residue-free.
While curry leaves, mint leaves, and coriander leaves showed pesticide residue higher than the safe level prescribed by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, sambar chilli and green chilli were found to contain pesticide residue lower than the safety limit.
V.S. Sunil Kumar says an R&D programme would be taken up by the Agriculture Department and KAU.

DINATHANTHI NEWS


தர்மபுரியில் விற்பனை செய்யப்பட்ட மாம்பழ ஜூஸ் பாட்டிலில் பல்லி? உணவு பாதுகாப்பு அதிகாரிகள் விசாரணை

தர் ம புரி, மே 27:
தர் ம புரி பேருந்து நிலை யத் தில் உள்ள டீக் க டை யில் விற் பனை செய் யப் பட்ட மாம் பழ ஜூஸ் பாட் டி லில் இறந்த பல்லி மிதந் த தாக புகார் எழுந் தது குறித்து உணவு பாது காப்பு அதி கா ரி கள் விசா ரணை நடத்தி வரு கின் ற னர்.
தர் ம புரி சத் தி ரம் மேல் தெருவை சேர்ந் த வர் சீனி வா சன். இவர் நேற்று காலை தர் ம புரி புற ந கர் பேருந்து நிலை யத் தில் உள்ள ஒரு டீக் க டை யில், பிர பல தனி யார் நிறு வ னத் தின் மாம் பழ ஜூஸ் பாட் டிலை வாங் கி னார். பாட் டி லுக் குள் ஜூஸ் சு டன் இறந்த பல்லி போன்ற ஒரு பொருள் மிதப் பது தெரிந் தது. இத னால் அதிர்ச்சி அடைந்த சீனி வா சன் தர் ம புரி உணவு பாது காப்பு துறை அதி கா ரி க ளுக்கு தக வல் கொடுத் தார். அதன் பேரில் தர் ம புரி வட் டார உணவு பாது காப்பு அலு வ லர் கோபி நாத் மாம் பழ ஜூஸ் விற் பனை செய் யப் பட்ட கடை யில் ஆய்வு நடத் தி னார். பின் னர் அந்த பாட் டிலை பறி மு தல் செய்து எடுத்து சென் றார்.
இது குறித்து உணவு பாத காப்பு அலு வ லர் கோபி நாத் கூறு கை யில், ஆய் வுக்கு பின் னர் தான் பாட் டி லில் இருப் பது என்ன என் பது தெரி யும். முறைப் படி ஆய் வுக்கு அனுப்பி அறிக்கை கிடைத்த பின் சம் பந் தப் பட்ட குளிர் பான நிறு வ னத் திற்கு விளக் கம் கேட்டு நோட் டீஸ் அனுப் பப் ப டும். இது தொடர் பாக முறை யான நட வ டிக்கை எடுக் கப் ப டும் என் றார்.

DINAMANI NEWS


FSSAI needs to step up and do its job proactively


Bakers' half-baked vow of safety

Kolkata: Alarmed by the sharp drop in sales, bakeries in the state attempted to assure consumers that the bread they manufactured was safe, but admitted that harmful additives could be present in either the flour or the bread improver added to the dough. 
Speaking at a hurriedly convened press conference on Thursday, representatives of bakers said potassium bromate and potassium iodate, if present, were within the limit prescribed by food safety regulator FSSAI. They, however, acknowledged that the claim was not based on test reports but faith. 
The two chemicals have been banned in EU for being possibly carcinogenic, but are allowed in India in measured quantities. 
"We have not checked the level of the two chemicals in the bread we make, but I am confident it is not beyond the permissible limit. Moreover, there is no conclusive proof that bread has caused cancer or thyroid ailments in anyone here. The report published by an environment action group in Delhi is alarmist and misleading. We believe it is a conspiracy hatched by a corporate to corner the bread market by driving small and medium manufacturers out of business on the pretext of safety," said Idris Ali, a Trinamool Congress MP and secretary of the largest forum of bakers in the state. 
In an emotional appeal, Ali urged consumers to continue having bread as the industry would otherwise collapse and drive lakhs out of jobs. "Sales have already dipped by 30%. The situation will become grim if sales continue to drop," he said. 
However, other bakers present, including Sk Ismail Hossain who represents another bakers' forum, admitted most bakeries did not have chemists or laboratory facilities to test the chemical composition of ingredients. "We do quality checks, but that does not involve chemical analysis. We have no way of knowing if the chemicals are present beyond the permissible limit in the flour or the improver," he said. 
Bakers in Bengal: 4,000 (3,500 small; 450 medium; 50 big) 
Daily production: 10-12 lakh pounds
No of consumers: 40-48 lakh 
Consumption in Kolkata: 5 lakh pound
No of consumers in Kolkata: 20 lakh

FSSAI lauds bread makers decision on controversial chemicals

New Delhi, May 26 (PTI) Welcoming bread makers decision to stop using controversial chemicals in their products, food regulator FSSAI today said it will remove all apprehensions in public mind and shows that bread manufacturers are committed to public health.
The All India Bread Manufacturers Association (AIBMA), which represents over 90 organised bread manufacturers sich as Harvest Gold and Britannia has announced that they will stop using potassium bromate and potassium iodate voluntarily from tonight itself.
"... this decision will remove all apprehensions in public mind that have arisen with the findings of the CSE report. It shows that the bread manufacturers are responsible food businesses committed to public health and food safety," Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) CEO Pawan Agarwal told reporters here. On May 23, the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), while releasing a study had claimed that the bread samples of top brands in Delhi contained cancer-causing chemicals -- potassium bromate and potassium iodate. While appreciating that the CSE highlighted issue relating to use of potassium bromate in bread but Agarwal pointed that removal of potassium bromate has already been decided by the food authority based on the report of scientific panel. "It would have helped if the CSE had shared the findings of its reports with the FSSAI so that a necessary panic among public at large could have been avoided," he added.