May 31, 2019

No online food order in Punjab without hygiene rating

Setting three months deadline, the Punjab Government on Thursday directed all the online food order and supply companies to display the hygiene ratings of all the Food Business Operators registered or affiliated with them.
Moving ahead on the quality food assurance agenda of Tandrust Punjab Mission, the directions were issued by the state Health and Family Welfare Minister Brahm Mohindra giving them three months for compliance. The Minister said that after 90 days of issuance of formal communiqué in this regard, “no online food order is to be delivered in the State without hygiene rating”.
Giving details, the state Food and Drug Administration Commissioner-cum-Tandrust Punjab Mission director KS Pannu said that Online Food Order and Supply Companies take online orders from the consumers for the supply of food and deliver the same after procuring it from the food business operators (FBO's) associated with them.
“Under the normal circumstances, the consumer directly approaches the FBOs and therefore, through primary contact, the consumer is aware about the quality of food and the hygienic condition under which food is prepared or served,” he said adding that the online order and delivery mechanism of food supply has created a physical disconnect between the consumer and the food maker.
“Hence, the onus of ensuring the quality of food and the hygienic condition under which food is prepared, has shifted to the intermediate food delivery mechanism. It is in this context that it has been decided on the directions of Health Minister that all the online food orders or delivery companies shall ensure that FBOs registered or affiliated with them have their hygiene rating done from the FSSAI empanelled companies,” he said.
Pannu, divulging into the details of the rating mechanism, said that hygiene rating on a scale of five smilies is undertaken as per the guidelines of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
The National Food authority has empanelled 23 companies to conduct the audit and hygiene rating of FBOs.
A meeting has been held with the representatives of major Online Food Order and Supply Companies operational in Punjab like Zomato, Swiggy, Uber Eats and Food Panda and they have been sensitized on the issue.
“Commissionerate has issued a formal letter to them wherein they have been directed to get the hygiene rating done of all the FBOs registered with them and only those operators who are at higher level of hygiene rating (bearing three or more smilies), should be allowed to supply food under the online food orders or delivery mechanism,” he said.
Pannu added that they have also been told that the website of their companies should contain the details regarding hygiene rating of the food establishments registered with them so that consumer is empowered to take informed decision before placing the online order for food delivery.
Date of rating or inspection is also to be mentioned in the page containing details about the food making unit on the company’s website or portal or App. Besides, the periodical inspection of their registered or affiliated FBOs is to be ensured so that they continue to follow hygiene standards in food preparation and service practices.
It has been mandated that the packaging, in which delivery of food is done to the consumer by the Online Food Order and Supply Companies, should bear prominent information with regard to the status of hygiene rating of the unit supplying the food for delivery to the consumer, said Pannu.

Food Safety Department keeps an eye

At a meeting convened by Tamil Nadu Commissioner of Food Safety by Beela Rajesh, Designated Officers of Food Safety and Drug Administration Department were instructed to conduct inspections at packaged drinking water units across the State.
S Chithra, Designated Officer, Food Safety and Drug Administration, Tiruchi, said that the inspections would begin on Friday and would go on for a week. “There are around 5 units within the city and over 30 across the district. The inspections are meant to ensure supply of clean drinking water,” she said.
All water packaging units supplying bubble top water cans must have four certificates. An Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) certificate, a Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) number, a Food Safety and Drug Administration Department certificate and in case they are sourcing their water from groundwater resources, a certificate was needed for that too. “All certificates must be in order for the unit to function. Without them, the unit will be forced to shut down,” said Ms. Chithra.
There have been violations in the past, Ms. Chithra added.
Samples which will be collected at all units will be sent for quality testing. The samples fall into four categories — unsafe, sub-standard and complied to standards and, genuine. “There are some units, especially near Cauvery river who have dug up borewells and are supplying tankers and drinking water. These will have to be checked,” she said.

Mumbai: Food chains get 83-point hygiene checklist, two months to comply

MUMBAI: Some of the city's top food chains have been handed over a checklist of 83 points related to hygiene, food safety, transportation of food and personal hygiene. They are expected to comply within the next two months. 
On Tuesday, the state Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials met representatives from Burger King, KFC, McDonalds, Faasos, Mainland China, Wok Express, Barbeque Nation, among many others, and gave them a checklist comprising norms laid down under schedule 4 of the Food Safety Act.
"All these chains are popular and see massive footfall. While most have hygiene practices of their own, we wanted uniformity and compliance under the Act," said Pallavi Darade, FDA commissioner. Most of these chains have 350-400 outlets across the state. "Targeting them for hygiene would mean we are reaching out to a big number," she said.
Among the requirements are updated Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) licence, prominently displayed in the restaurant premises. The internal structures and fittings have to be made of non-toxic and impermeable material. Walls, ceilings and floors should be free from flaking paint. The checklist also calls for proper segregation of raw material and cooked food as well as vegetarian and non-vegetarian food. An official said that failure to comply with the norms could also mean suspension or cancellation of licence for that outlet.
"We have given the chains two months, following which we will conduct surprise checks," said Darade. When asked if the action was prompted by complaints of unhygienic food, she said, "We get sporadic complaints which we investigate from time to time. But this initiative is to ensure maximum reach"

5,700kg of spurious ghee recovered in Shahdara, Khanpur

The raid was conducted following complaints from dairy brand Milkfood, which led to the seizure of 330 cartons of 15kg each filled with fake brand labels.
A joint raid by the Delhi food safety department and Delhi Police on Wednesday led to the seizure of at least 5,700kg of counterfeit ghee from two wholesale shop in Shahdara and Khanpur. 
A joint raid by the Delhi food safety department and Delhi Police on Wednesday led to the seizure of at least 5,700kg of counterfeit ghee from two wholesale shop in Shahdara and Khanpur. The seized ghee were spuriously packaged under labels of popular ghee brands.
The raid was conducted following complaints from dairy brand Milkfood, which led to the seizure of 330 cartons of 15kg each filled with fake brand labels. During the raid, food safety officers also found fake ghee labelled under the ‘Gowardhan’ brand.
“The police had one complaint from Milkfood, but when our inspectors took a look at the other products in the store, they also found the fake Gowardhan ghee. We had seized at least 1,000kg fake ghee with the same batch number two weeks ago. Laboratory analysis confirmed that the previous samples were unsafe and hence the officers decided to confiscate the 44 cartons, each with 18 jars of ghee of one kilogram each,” a senior official from the food safety department said.
“We collected samples for lab analysis, and saw that the ghee was solid even though the temperatures are high. Ghee is semi-solid at room temperature in summer. Additionally, the colour was also paler than ghee. The smell was consistent, but that could be from essence. The samples that we had picked up earlier were rancid,” Ranjit Singh, designated officer, Delhi’s food safety department, said.
The food safety department on Thursday started a four-day campaign to test ghee samples in Delhi after huge quantities of fake ghee had been unearthed.
The earlier batch of counterfeit Gowardhan ghee, upon laboratory analysis, was found to be unsafe. “The accused had been arrested under the copyright violations case and are currently on bail. Another case under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, has been filed in court,” said an official from the food safety department, on the condition of anonymity.
“We received complaints that counterfeit ghee under our brand name was being sold in Delhi, so we registered a complaint with the police. The Agmark serial number of the products seized during the raid did not match our ongoing series of numbers, and was from the 2017 series,” said Dhanraj Singh Negi, assistant vice-president of Milkfood Limited.
“We realised there was a problem when we came to know that our ghee was being sold at ₹100 less than our market price. We also received complaints from some customers that the quality of the ghee was bad,” said Dinesh Bhatnagar, head, corporate affairs at Parag Milk Food, the company that manufactures Gowardhan ghee had said.

Commissioner FSO fines bakery unit in Srinagar

Commissioner, Food Safety Organisation for J&K Vinod Sharma Thursday inspected food establishments in Srinagar City.
The team inspected various Bakery and Confectionary Units within Srinagar City to check the quality of bakery and confectionary items available for the consumption of general public.
During inspection a bakery Unit namely JeeEnn Sons, Polo View, Srinagar, was fined an amount of Rs 20,000 on spot for not maintaining sanitary and hygienic conditions in the processing unit.
Various Dhabas including M/S Krishna Dhaba, M/S New Krishna DhabaDalgate were also inspected and the in-charges of the establishments were impressed upon to strictly follow the sanitary and hygienic requirements of Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006 Rules & regulations made there under.
Meanwhile, after taking cognizance of a video circulated on social media regarding quality of ‘Dairyland’ Dahi manufacture at Lasipora, Pulwama, the team of Food Safety Officers from Pulwama swung into action and sealed the manufacturing unit in the interest of public health. Team also seized 434 Dahi cups and lifted samples of same for analytical purpose.

Mokokachung relaxes ban on sale, import of fish

Dimapur, May 30 (EMN): The Mokokchung administration has relaxed the ban on the sale and import of fish in the district. The authorities have listed a number of conditions for fish businesses to comply with, or face action.
The government’s publicity agency, the department of Information and Public Relations (IPR) issued a press release to the media on Thursday informing about an order from the authorities informing about the change. 
Mokokchung’s Additional Deputy Commissioner W Manpai Phom informed that the sale and import of fish and fish products into the district ‘will’ be partially relaxed, the IPR stated. The decision to relax the ban partially was made during on May 1. The new order comes with a number of conditions.
The district administration has ordered that no sale or distribution of fish shall be allowed unless a sample of the consignment has been tested for presence of formalin or other harmful chemical preservatives that have been prohibited under relevant sections of the Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006 (FSSA).
Testing shall be done through the ‘formal route’ of the Food & Safety officer’s establishment.
Again, samples may be obtained from a particular consignment regularly or at random, ‘subject to reasonable suspicion.’ If needed, the already tested consignment may be put to test again on case-to-case basis, the IPR stated of the administration’s order.
“It shall be the duty of the wholesalers to inform the district administration and Food & Safety officer about arrival of fresh consignment, failing which shall be considered a wilful criminal intent to eclipse (sic) the information,” the updates stated.
“Unless the consignment does not get a clearance from the administration or Food & Safety officer, the fish products shall be considered deemed to be prohibited for sale and distribution.”
The administration has warned that failing to comply with the order and its terms shall be an offence under section-59 of the FSSA of 2006.
Traders are advised to maintain proper invoices and receipts so that in case of sample being tested positive of formalin and other harmful chemical preservatives the case may traced.
The administration and all line departments are directed to strengthen surveillance activities and carry out inspection, checking and testing from time to time, the IPR added.

May 30, 2019

Eating out frequently? 80% eateries in India don't have food safety licence

Out of the 2.49 million food business operators (FBOs) in India, only 467,000 or nearly 20% have a food safety licence
New Delhi: It may leave a bad (read unhealthy) taste in your mouth if you are eating out frequently! Out of the 2.49 million food business operators (FBOs) in India, only 467,000 or nearly 20% have a food safety licence, says 'NRAI India Food Services Report 2019'. The study covered restaurants, eateries, dhabas and kiosks, among other channels.
Findings of the study have compelled the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India to speed up registration of small food businesses, the Economic Times said in a report.
According to the ET report, last week, FSSAI asked the Food and Drug Administration across states to issue licences within two months of an application being filed if no inadequacy is found. The food safety authority also said that petty food businesses can start operations if registration is not granted or denied.
This means if an inspection is not ordered within a week or no decision is communicated within a month, small food businesses may start their business, according to FSSAI’s letter to commissioners of food safety of all states and union territories. A copy of the letter was reviewed by ET.
"FSSAI has received representations from food business operators regarding non-issuance or nonprocessing of their licence and registration within a stipulated timeframe. This causes undue inconvenience and delays in commencing food businesses by FBOs,” the business daily quoted the letter as saying and FSSAI CEO Pawan Kumar Agarwal also confirmed the details to ET.
Worth mentioning here is India's food service sector generates nearly Rs 4.2 lakh crore revenue annually with 65% coming from unorganised businesses. NRAI expects the share of this unorganised segment to drop to 57% by 2023. “These unorganised establishments are not registered under FSSAI or GST, and do put public health and tax at risk. With consumer awareness, FSSAI’s vigilance and delisting by aggregators, we see this tilt towards a much-needed formalisation of the sector,” the business daily quoted Rahul Singh, president of NRAI as saying. In fact, nearly half the licensed eateries are in just two states-—Tamil Nadu with 116,000 FBOs and Maharashtra with 90,530 FBOs.

Only 4.67 lakh eateries have FSSAI licence: Report

The food industry is vast in India and generates business worth Rs 4.23 lakh crore every year.
Only 4.67 lakh of the 24.9 lakh food business operators (FBOs) in India have a food safety licence, according to the NRAI India Food Services Report 2019. This means only one in five eateries in the country has a licence by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
The FSSAI ordered the Food and Drug Administration last week to grant licences to restaurants within two months if they are found to be compliant with the rules. The food regulator also said in a letter to commissioners of food safety across India, that small businesses that were not granted registration or faced a delayed process, can start operations. Also, if the body does not order inspection within a week of registration, or there is no communication for a month, restaurants or outlets may start serving food.
"FSSAI has received representations from food business operators regarding non-issuance or non-processing of their licence and registration within a stipulated time frame. This causes undue inconvenience and delays in commencing food businesses by FBOs," the letter read, as per a report in The Economic Times.
The food industry is vast in India and generates business worth Rs 4.23 lakh crore every year. But, more than half of it is still unorganised, and as per the NRAI, that will shrink by 2023.
Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra have the most number of licenced food outlets (1.16 lakh and 90,530 respectively).

May 29, 2019

Tea adulteration


FDA has slapped Maganlal Chikki with a fine of ₹5L

Three different adjudications filed against the sweet makers for violating food safety norms
The state Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has slapped a fine of Rs 5 lakh on Lonavala-based Maganlal Food Products, manufacturer of Maganlal Chikki, on Monday after the latter was found guilty of violating the food safety norms. The agency has initiated an adjudication against the century-old chain of sweet manufacturers for violating the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, and Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011. Earlier the maker of the traditional Indian sweet was ordered to shut down production and sale of chikkis and even issued an improvement notice. Three different adjudications were filed against the manufacturer for the alleged violations, officials said.
In December last year, the FDA had conducted a surprise visit at the famous chikki-manufacturing unit of Nangargaon, in Lonavala, only to find the makers flouting health and hygiene norms as set by the FDA. More shockingly, despite conducting business for the past 100 years, the unit was found to not get the raw materials, food products checked according to the food safety rules. Consequently, Maganlal Food Products was issued an improvement notice and even asked to halt production and sale of its famed product. Co-owner and business partner Ashok Agarwal was present when the unit was raided.
Suresh Deshmukh, joint commissioner, FDA, Pune, said, “We have fined the manufacturer to the tune of Rs 5 lakh for the three different adjudications — violations of food safety and hygiene norms, missing veg logo in advertisements and usage of synthetic colour above permissible limit in the strawberry chikki. A sum of Rs 1 lakh, Rs 1.5 lakh and Rs 2.5 lakh, respectively, were levied.”
Deshmukh said, “Earlier they were asked to halt their business and given an improvement notice. Only after the criteria were met, they were allowed to commence business after 15 days. We have given them a one-month time to pay the sum towards the fine.”
Talking about the violations, Agarwal said, “We have made necessary changes and will soon pay the penalty amount. In future too, Maganlala Chikki will function as per the food safety norms.”


In December 2018, FDA officials had conducted a raid at Nangargaon unit

Of 127 food samples, none fails quality test

Health Department launched mobile food testing van in district on May 16
Residents get food samples checked on the food safety van in Patiala on Monday. 
Patiala, May 27
Out of 127 food samples collected by a mobile food testing van, none of the sample has failed quality test. The food testing van was flagged by the Health Department on May 16.
Of these, 85 were of milk and milk products while 40 samples were of khoya. The department had tested 29 samples in Patiala city, 36 in Rajpura, 15 in Nabha, 12 in Bhadson, 20 in Bahadurgarh and 15 in Samana.
The health officials informed that the food testing lab would be available in the district until May 31. The officials said the food testing van was fully equipped to conduct tests for adulteration in milk, water, edible oils and other items.
District Health Officer (DHO) Satinder Singh said, “So far, all food samples have passed the quality test. The main aim of the van is to check food adulteration. The results are positive because we had instructed food handlers in the district to follow the FSSAI food safety standards.”
He said in case a sample fails the quality test, the department would send it to the state food lab in Kharar to get the complete report. Based on the state lab report, fine would be decided, he added.
The DHO said the lab on wheels would visit different areas of the city and residents could avail the facility to know the quality of food products being used at their homes. He said people would have to pay a fee of Rs 50 per sample for getting it tested. The van is funded by the Central Government and follows the guidelines of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). 
He said, “The mobile testing van was an initiative to ensure that residents eat hygienic food as per the food safety guidelines. Milk, milk products, tea leaves, spices and condiments, sugar, water and other edibles can be tested.”

May 27, 2019

Meat of matter: Veg only again at food street

Chandigarh: Availability of only vegetarian food, charges similar to those at canteens of PGI and Panjab University (PU), Rs 10,000 penalty in case of overcharging and Rs 1 lakh reserve price of each kiosk per month are some of the key features the municipal corporation (MC) has incorporated in its MoU (memorandum of understanding) to be signed with eligible bidders for the Night Food Street, Sector 14, opposite PGI.
It will be for the first time the civic body will be holding e-tendering for the project. Earlier, kiosks were either given through the draw of lots or bidding system.
The MoU will be placed before members of the general house during the monthly house meeting of the civic body on Thursday. The Night Food Street has been shut since the last three months.
Under vegetarian food, Indian, Chinese, continental, south Indian, fast food, juices and cold drinks will be allowed at the kiosks. However, egg-based dishes would be allowed to be sold in the kiosks. The MoU clarified cooking would not be allowed in the kiosks and they would only sell food items.
According to the MoU, the reserve prices of each kiosk would be Rs 1 lakh per month with GST. Initially, the shops would be given for an year but will be extendable to a maximum of three years, subject to satisfactory performance and increase of 10% of last payable licence fee.
The applicant should have valid food licence under Food Safety Act issued by a competent authority. In the case of non-payment of the licence fee or non-use of such kiosks by the due or extended date not exceeding 60 days or breach or non-observance by the licencee of any of the conditions of the licence, it shall be lawful to terminate the licence.
Back after 3 months
The civic body had used the period of two-and-a-half months of the model code of conduct period owing to the Lok Sabha elections to prepare a MoU for the Night Food Street, which is all set to open after a gap of three months.
Rate list
The MoU clearly mentioned that the licence shall display the rate list of the eatable items at a place visible to all customers. The licencee shall keep kiosks and its surroundings in a clean and hygienic condition and no sale of tobacco would be allowed. Polythene bags shall not be allowed for packing of food items. Inspection of kiosks and food items and its charges are the key segments of the MoU.

Beware! The milk you are drinking might have detergent in it

01/7Packaged milk contains detergent and starch!
Come summer and demand for milk and milk products increases. The vast gap between demand and supply gives the market players a scope to play around with unfair means in order to make a profit. A recent raid in the dairy plant has revealed that the packaged milk is basically a concoction of milk, white paint and detergent. In case you are buying the packaged milk, there are chances you are consuming detergent in the name of milk.
02/7Dairy plant raid in Varanasi
Recently, a huge dairy plant was raided in Varanasi by the state's Food Department and over ten thousand litres of spurious milk, mixed with detergent was seized. Run by Pure Dairy Solutions, the plant had been marketing milk by the brand name Kashi Sanyog. During the raid, it was discovered that milk contained detergent, urea and starch.
03/7Why detergent and starch are added?
During the raid, it was revealed that most of the dairy plants in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and Punjab usually use these unfair means during summers when there is an acute shortage of milk.
04/7Patiala case
Last year during the summer season, a huge dairy plant in Patiala was raided and over seven thousand litres of adulterated milk, mixed with detergent powder was recovered. Around 323 bags (of 50 kg each) of skimmed milk using chemicals were also recovered from this plant.
05/7Delhi Food Safety Department report
Between January 2018 and April 2019 the milk test conducted by Delhi Food Safety Department reflects that all the milk products are sub-standard. During this period around 477 samples were tested in the Delhi-NCR region.
06/7AWBI guidelines
According to Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) 68.7 per cent of milk and milk products sold in India are not as per the standards laid down by Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI). The research report says that the adulterated milk and related products have 45-60 percent detergents, caustic soda, glucose, white paint and refined oil in them.
07/7Verdict
It is recommended to buy fresh milk from the local milkman, as it is safer compared to packaged milk. Also, try to visit the cattle farm and buy milk after checking the purity of milk.

May 26, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


Food safety dept to crack the whip on illegal masala units

Madurai: After cracking the whip on adulteration in cooking oil, ghee and a range of flours, food safety department officials from the district have now set their eyes on substandard masala powders widely used in various types of foods. The move has been necessitated after it has come to light that many of the units producing masalas are running their business without obtaining licence, which is mandatory under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
Meanwhile, officials have asked the residents not to buy readymade masalas, available in packets. They have instead asked them to purchase raw materials and prepare the masalas at home, which would not only be cost-effective but also ensure the best ingredients go into cooking.
“After grinding the masala, banned artificial colouring additives and flavour enhancers are used to make them appealing. Using such masalas can result in health problems in the long run. It is always safe to prepare masala at home,” designated officer for food safety, Madurai district, Dr M Somasundaram .
Somasundaram said that they found sub-standard materials in an illegal masala production unit during an inspection carried out recently. The ingredients were infested with insects and fungal matters. Rampant adulteration was also found. They suspect that it could be the scenario in all illegal units.
“There are no numbers available on the exact number of units manufacturing masalas because many are run illegally without licence. We have estimated that there could be more than 200 units. Inspections will be conducted area-wise to ensure quality products are supplied to people,” an official from the food safety department said.

How do you know your organic food is really organic?




Shankar Langati at his farm in Belagavi district; a farmer at Hanumantaraju’s organic fruit and vegetable collection centre in Nelamangala. 
As the organic food market expands, fruit and vegetable suppliers are under pressure to supply more, and some of them are taking shortcuts. The principles of organic farming are difficult to follow when the volumes are big, trade insiders say.
“The demand is growing exponentially. Retailers want volume and variety and growers are forced to use chemicals and pass off their products as organic,” a major supplier to organic stores in Bengaluru told DH.
It happens with a range of products. Take organic rice. Recent entrants to the trade buy paddy from random growers, have it milled, and sell it as organic to big supply chains. “All they need is a transaction certificate in an organic farmer’s name, and they sometimes get it even without the farmer’s knowledge,” said B N Nandish, an organic farmer in Shivamogga district. “This trend worries genuine organic farmers.”
Some retail chains in Bengaluru cheat, too. “They approach us for organic produce and ask for a copy of our organic certification. They place orders for a couple of weeks and then stop, only to use our name to sell products sourced from elsewhere,” said Ravi K, chief executive officer of a Regional Cooperative Organic Farmers’ Association Federation, facilitated by the state’s agriculture department.
The more genuine traders are worried about the authenticity of what they get. “I had to check at least 50 sources before getting a genuine organic food supplier,” said Shodhan Kumar, proprietor of an organic food import and export firm.
Champions of the movement are concerned that the primary objectives of organic farming are being compromised. Currently, neither the farmer nor the consumer reaps the benefits of organic farming.
Pioneer problems
In 2004, Karnataka became the first state in India to get an organic farming policy. The area under organic certification increased from 2,500 hectares in 2004 to one lakh-plus hectares in 2018, and certified production is estimated at three lakh tonnes.
The market is growing faster, and the growth comes with its own problems.“As the supply chain grows longer, there is a greater disconnect and it becomes nearly impossible for a consumer to trace the producer,” said Vishala, who works with farmers and runs an organic store in Bengaluru.
She calls for a regulation with a decentralised approach to sustain the movement.
Her apprehensions are valid: it is estimated that about 80% of the organic food market is controlled by a few big players.
DH visited some organic stores in Bengaluru and asked the storekeepers whether they were aware of where their supplies were coming from. In eight out of 10 shops, they didn’t have a clear answer.
“In any organic trade fair, you see every item available at every stall. There’s no clarity about the source. Even the farmers’ federations, instead of selling what they produce, display a wide range of products,” said V Gayathri of the Institute for Cultural Research and Action, a pioneering organic farming initiative in the state.
The federations should market region-specific products. That will help local farmers, she observed.
The state has 15 organic farmer federations and 576 organic villages. These villages were declared organic under the state government’s organic scheme. They have now lost motivation for want of guidance and supervision.
What should have been a movement of farmers is now driven by industry. As a result, it has moved away from the basic principles of sustainable livelihood, ecological responsibility, and food safety.
“Farmers do want to take up organic farming, but they need skills, resources and continuous support. Even when it comes to government support — in the form of research or subsidies — organic farming gets a smaller share than chemical farming,” said Dr K Ramakrishnappa, former additional director, Department of Horticulture.
The aim should be to replace chemical farming with organic farming, he said.
Hanumantaraju, who supplies fruits and vegetables to about 80 organic outlets in Bengaluru, works with 400 farmers, two-thirds of whom are certified.
Though his four field workers randomly visit the farms, he finds it difficult to check if the product is genuine.
“Getting them tested for chemical residues in a lab approved by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) is expensive. I have to shell out about Rs 10,000 for each sample,” he told DH.
A state-run lab in Bengaluru does the tests for free for farmers, but not many know about it. Also, the lab is not yet approved by NABL or the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority.
Testing organic food is not something an individual consumer thinks about, even when she is paying a premium. There should be a place for farmers to deposit their produce, from where samples can be checked for residues, many felt.
Saraswati, who works with about 40 farmers and supplies organic produce to shops in Bengaluru, believes the boom of organic produce has resulted in an influx of players with no idea about the spirit of organic farming.
Who pockets premium?
“We see new stores opening every day. Even if a few go against ethics, it hampers the entire organic movement that has evolved on passion, integrity and trust,” said K Srinivas Aithal, in the business for 10 years. Organic produce is priced at 25% to 200% more than chemically grown produce. But sadly, the money the consumer pays doesn’t go to the farmer.
A study commissioned by the Karnataka Agricultural Price Commission (KAPC) shows the imbalance: traders make way more money than growers.
“Organic farming should be made profitable for farmers. We have proposed the formulation of an Organic Price Policy,” said KAPC Chairman T N Prakash Kammaradi.
The word ‘organic’ is used extensively now. Words such as ‘natural’ and ‘herbal’ are used without any basis. “If I see bright, attractive, uniform and unseasonal fruits and vegetables on the shelf, I know the store is not dedicated to organic food,” said Ashu, a consumer, told DH. Her advice: Consumers should ask questions, observe and only then buy a product.
Most stores have their own labels for organic grocery, and they claim they get their supplies from farmers or aggregators they know. With so little clarity about certification, how do you make out whether the ‘organic’ label is genuine?
Branding tricks
“Many a time, we are misled by glib talk and the ambience of the shop. The word ‘organic’ is the main driver,” said Jayashri, who regularly buys organic. Misrepresentation and misbranding are two major concerns that need to be addressed as the market grows exponentially.
On April 2, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) issued a direction regarding Food Safety and Standards (Organic Foods) Regulations, 2017. It has made it mandatory for all organic food business operators to get the Jaivik Bharat logo, the FSSAI organic logo, to distinguish their products from non-organic ones. 
FSSAI permits small organic producers, with an annual turnover of less than Rs 12 lakh, to sell their produce to end-consumers without certification.
Also exempted are aggregators with an annual turnover of less than Rs 50 lakh, selling directly to end-consumers. They need not procure only from certified organic farmers. Growers say the exemptions make no sense.
“Certification is meant to provide quality assurance. Why would a farmer, even if her turnover is more than Rs 12 lakh, need certification if she sells directly and when the consumer obviously knows her? Also, aggregators can’t sustain the business if the turnover is less than Rs 50 lakh. It has to be at least Rs 2 to 3 crore for them to break even,” said Kavitha Kuruganti of The Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA).
Along with other organisations, ASHA has taken growers’ concerns to the FSSAI. Further, the regulation, which is notified under the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, is ultra vires Section 18 (3) of the Act that excludes farmers from the provisions of the Act.
Consumers pay a premium for organic products because they believe they are safe and healthy. “When people are misguided into eating chemical-laced food as organic food, it could have negative health consequences,” said K C Raghu, a food expert, who runs an organic food business.
According to a study conducted by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, the lack of a nodal agency is hampering the growth of the industry. 
Brijesh Kumar Dikshit, commissioner for agriculture, Karnataka, agrees. “There has to be convergence to streamline the growing organic trade,” he said. 
Climate change is for real. Organic farming is the way forward. Farmers need sustainable cultivation and continuous market support to tide over the economic and ecological crisis they are facing.
Consumers want products that are safe, healthy and environment-friendly. The future of the organic movement lies in connecting these two crucial stakeholders.

Food Safety team raids illegal wholesale units of Momos

Momos found kept in unhygienic and insanitary conditions at a residential house in Gorkha Nagar, Jammu during a raid of Food Safety team.
JAMMU, May 25: Consequent upon the receipt of numerous complaints regarding quality of veg and non-veg Momos available in the market, a team of Food Safety headed by Commissioner of Food Safety, J&K Government, Vinod Sharma paid a surprise visit at Gorkha Nagar, where these momos are cooked on whole sale and distributed to various food vendors.
During the inspection, it was found that almost all the cooking premises were mainly established in the residential houses of the people at Gorkha Nagar, Jammu, wherein samples of prepared momos, sauces and raw materials used for preparations of Momos were lifted and sent to the Food Testing Laboratory for detection of adulteration.
Commissioner directed the food business operators to obtain licenses of their food establishments from FSSAI, improve the infrastructure and maintain hygiene at all levels to avoid cross contamination. Further, he warned all the food vendors not to prepare unhealthy Momos otherwise legal action shall be initiated against them.
He directed concerned officers to deal with violators stringently as per norms laid down under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, not to compromise on unhygienic conditions and maintain sanitation in and around the cooking premises. He also advised public to check each and every eatable before consuming.
Later, the team also inspected the food establishments situated at Gole Market and Gandhi Nagar and passed the directions to food vendors to improve the basic infrastructure as well as hygiene level. The team also inspected food vendors at Miran Sahib, lifted samples of bakery and pastries to the Food Testing Laboratory for detection of adulteration.
The team was comprised of Assistant Commissioner, Food Safety, Municipal Limits Jammu, Dr Parvesh Kumar and other Food Inspectors.

May 25, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


FSSAI discontinues 14 state food testing labs which do not have NABL accreditation

New Delhi, May 24 (KNN) The Foods Safety & Standard Authority of India (FSSAI) has decided to discontinue as many as 14 State Food Testing Laboratories which do not have NABL accreditation.
The National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) is a Constituent Board of Quality Council of India. Laboratory accreditation is a procedure by which an authoritative body gives formal recognition of technical competence for specific tests/ measurements, based on third party assessment and following international standards.
In a notification, FSSAI said, “In the last 2 years, FSSAI has repeatedly requested States/ Union Territories for initiating NABL accreditation process and submit an undertaking in this regard..”
The food watchdog had warned that in case the laboratories fail to do so, “respective laboratories shall be discontinued as food laboratories under Section 98 of FSS Act, 2006.

May 23, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


Food Safety Check



Avoid adulterated edible oil, says food safety dept

Trichy: The food safety and drug administration department has warned consumers not to fall prey to poor quality edible oil just because it is sold on the cheap, saying it is mostly made without following prescribed norms . 
Random searches by food safety officials on some of the oil mills manufacturing edible oils revealed traces of malpractice of adulterating sesame oil and groundnut oil with palmolein oil.
“Palm oil is mixed with sesame oil and groundnut oil. Unaware of the adulteration, people buy them because it’s cheap. People should avoid inferior and unhealthy products and obtain oils from reputed mills because palm oil will cause several health complications particularly heart related ones,” designated officer (DO), food safety and drug administration department Dr R Chithra told ToI on Wednesday.
Acting on a tip-off, the team led by Chithra visited an oil mill in Musiri on Tuesday. The team found packets filled with adulterated sesame and groundnut oil. The adulterated sesame oil or groundnut oil will have 70 % of palm oil, said DO Chithra. The violators add an essence to the palm oil to give the flavour of sesame oil and groundnut oil.
The food safety department has no idea as to what is the name of the essence. Food safety officers say that the traders are well aware of the loopholes to bypass the rules. A food safety officer said he had seen a private oil mill misbranding the oils in Musiri in 2018.
Instead of selling the adulterated oils in the name of sesame oil or coconut oil, they cheat consumers using small fonts on the pack. They print cooking oil in bold letters on the packet while say they have mixed it with palm oil in small fonts which cannot be easily noticed.
In Tamil, they print Nalla Ennai instead of Nallennai for sesame oil. For groundnut oil, they use picture of the groundnut without mentioning the name. Though they have been receiving complaints, they are yet to take a full-blown action on them.
Though mixing palm oil in other oil is permitted in FSSAI, the manufacturers deliberately avoid mentioning the ratio of blending on the label to sell oils for high price. Whatever may be the rules, the doctors suggest avoiding the use of palm oil in any quantity.
Interventional cardiologist Dr Kader Sahib Ashraf at Apollo Speciality Hospitals in Trichy was of the view that any oil consumed in excess quantity will take its toll on the cardiac system. “I would suggest intake of mustard oil and olive oil which won’t be harmful if taken in limited quantity. In general, the consumption of adulterated oil will no way good for heart,” he said on Wednesday.

51 Quintals of Mango Destroyed At Fancy Bazar Fruit Market In Guwahati, 2 Nabbed

GUWAHATI: The sleuths of the Food Safety Wing seized 51 quintals of mango and destroyed them at Fancy Bazar Fruit Market in Guwahati on Tuesday, besides nabbing two West Bengal-based traders. Three other traders, however, fled the scene.
It looks like an ordinary incident, but it is not as the crime involved in it has a direct bearing on human health, involving dreaded diseases like cancer.
The mangoes seized were artificially ripened ones. Ripening agents, when pricked to fruits, speed up the process of their ripening. These agents are particularly unsaturated hydrocarbons like acetylene, ethylene, etc. However, a chemical known as calcium carbide (CaC2) is the most commonly used one for artificial ripening of fruits. This chemical is only allowed for industrial use. The use of calcium carbide in fruits is banned in accordance with the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006. The Act is to consolidate the laws relating to food and to establish the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India for laying down science-based standards for articles of food and to regulate their manufacture, storage distribution, sale and import etc.
Consumption of artificially ripened fruits may lead to diarrhoea and vomiting. Prolonged consumption of fruits ripened by calcium carbide may lead to cancer in the alimentary canal.
The two nabbed West Bengal-based traders – Niranjan Roy and Sheikh Nurul Islam – have been handed over to Fancy Bazar police outpost.

May 22, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAMANI NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


Street Food Checked


Sweets firm under health dept lens

Jaipur: A sweets and snacks producing firm’s manufacturing unit at MD Road and retail unit at Raja Park were raided by the food safety wing of health department on Tuesday, wherein it was found that they were using tanker water for preparing the edible items. The food safety team also found that the food items were being prepared in unhygienic conditions. 
However, the major offence of the firm was that it was functional without procuring any licence from the health department. “The owner was preparing sweets and namkeens (snacks) at the MD Road unit and he was selling it from his outlet at Raja Park. But, when we demanded food licence from him, we found that he did not procure it. For producing and selling food items, one should have food licence. If anyone is doing so without a licence, it is a violation of the Food Safety and Standards Act,” said Dr Sunil Singh, nodal officer, food safety, health department.
They have also served notice to the firm for improvement. The firm has been served with a notice under section 32 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 for improvement and for not producing food items until it improves and obtains a licence. 
Besides, the food safety team also found that the firm was allegedly using sodium hydro sulphite, which is a non-edible item, in preparation of snacks and sweets.
Also, the team found ingredients’ packets such as coriander powder, which were past their expiry dates. The floor of the kitchen was broken and there were spider webs on walls of the kitchen, making it an unhygienic place for preparing food.

May 21, 2019

DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


DINAMANI NEWS


DINAKARAN NEWS


FSO imposes fine of Rs 2.32 lakh

JAMMU, May 20: Food Safety Organisation (FSO), J&K has imposed fine of Rs 2,32,500 on the violators of different provisions of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Rules and Regulations, 2011 in Srinagar district.
Prosecutions have also been sanctioned against the various Food Business Operators of the State which include M/S Delhi Special Eating Point, Udhampur, M/S Future Retail Ltd., Talab Tillo Jammu, M/S Shubham Goldiee Masala Pvt. Ltd, Kanpur, U.P., M/S Raja Kiryana Retail Shop, Sunderbani Rajouri, M/S Jai Bua Datti Enterprises, Sunderbani Rajouri and M/S Bikanervala Foods Pvt. Ltd., Greater Noida for selling, manufacturing, storing, distributing articles of food which have been declare as unsafe by the various food testing laboratories.

Sell organic produce without certification till 2020, don't use 'Jaivik Bharat logo': FSSAI tells farmers

The Jaivik Bharat logo is an identity mark to distinguish organic products from non-organic ones
Food safety regulator FSSAI has permitted small organic producers, having an annual turnover of over Rs 12 lakh, to sell their produce directly to end consumers without certification till April 2020, but will not be able to use 'Jaivik Bharat logo' on their products, a latest report says.
The Jaivik Bharat logo is an identity mark to distinguish organic products from non-organic ones.
A similar relaxation has been given to 'aggregators' having an annual turnover of Rs 50 lakh. However, the organic food retail firms have to comply with the certification norm.
Under the 2017 organic regulation, sale of organic produce directly to end consumer has been allowed only with the certification of the National Program for Organic Production (NPOP) and Participatory Guarantee System (PGS) India.
In its latest order, the Food Safety and Standards Authority (FSSAI) said the norms were relaxed after it examined several representations regarding challenges faced in the implementation of regulations by organic food business operations including small original producers.
"One of the challenges is that there are a large number of producers and producer organisations in the country who are not certified under any of the two systems of certification. Efforts are currently underway for simplification of PGS-India to make it small producer friendly," it said.
To build confidence in small producers, the regulator has said "...these regulations may be considered as 'enabling regulations' and not be considered for prosecution particulary for small original producers and producer organisations during initial phase of its implementation till April 2020".
The self certification of turnover of small organic producers and aggregators will be considered, the FSSAI said.
However, the state food safety officers have been asked to see if the limits of contaminants and insecticide residue as per the regulations are being followed. They have also been asked to see any misuse of this provision.