Mar 8, 2012
9 months on, not a single meet yet
The highest decision-making body of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has not met once for past nine months due to the absence of nominated members.
This has held up many important decisions such as those related to safety norms on labeling and claims, food supplements and imported food safety among others.
Reflecting its apathetic attitude towards the important issues related to food safety, the Health Ministry, which is the administrative Ministry for the FSSAI, has not even bothered to initiate the procedure to nominate the members of the apex panel also called as the Authority.
One third of the total members (22) have either resigned or completed their tenure in this period. Presently, the Authority is represented by seven members at the joint secretary level from Agriculture, Consumer Affairs, Food Processing, Commerce and Micro and Small and Enterprises (MSME) Ministries. The Authority is headed by the FSSAI Chairperson.
“The present format does not represent full Authority,” sources told The Pioneer.
The last meeting of the Authority was held in June last year under the chairmanship of the then Chairperson P Suvarathan... Every quarterly a meeting is mandatory. However, lackadaisical attitude to nominate the members and subsequent no meeting of the Authority has led to the piling up of many important files, the sources added.
As several regulations including those on neutraceuticals, claim assessments, antibiotics in honey and trans-fatty acids awaits approval, the unscrupulous elements in the food sector are having a field day as they throw rules out of the window at the cost of the health of the consumers.
Moreover, as the food industry has recently transitioned into a new regime under the integrated Food Law in last August, the regular meeting of the members would only streamline the process.
But the food watchdog has fallen victim to utter negligence — the minutes of the meetings held in the past shows that even joint secretary rarely bothered to attend all of them.
“Food is an important issue as it relates to all. But the Ministry has made mockery of the food regulator. First, it was without chairperson for months, now the post for CEO is yet to be filled up. When the members will be nominated, only the Ministry can tell,” the sources added.
This has held up many important decisions such as those related to safety norms on labeling and claims, food supplements and imported food safety among others.
Reflecting its apathetic attitude towards the important issues related to food safety, the Health Ministry, which is the administrative Ministry for the FSSAI, has not even bothered to initiate the procedure to nominate the members of the apex panel also called as the Authority.
One third of the total members (22) have either resigned or completed their tenure in this period. Presently, the Authority is represented by seven members at the joint secretary level from Agriculture, Consumer Affairs, Food Processing, Commerce and Micro and Small and Enterprises (MSME) Ministries. The Authority is headed by the FSSAI Chairperson.
“The present format does not represent full Authority,” sources told The Pioneer.
The last meeting of the Authority was held in June last year under the chairmanship of the then Chairperson P Suvarathan... Every quarterly a meeting is mandatory. However, lackadaisical attitude to nominate the members and subsequent no meeting of the Authority has led to the piling up of many important files, the sources added.
As several regulations including those on neutraceuticals, claim assessments, antibiotics in honey and trans-fatty acids awaits approval, the unscrupulous elements in the food sector are having a field day as they throw rules out of the window at the cost of the health of the consumers.
Moreover, as the food industry has recently transitioned into a new regime under the integrated Food Law in last August, the regular meeting of the members would only streamline the process.
But the food watchdog has fallen victim to utter negligence — the minutes of the meetings held in the past shows that even joint secretary rarely bothered to attend all of them.
“Food is an important issue as it relates to all. But the Ministry has made mockery of the food regulator. First, it was without chairperson for months, now the post for CEO is yet to be filled up. When the members will be nominated, only the Ministry can tell,” the sources added.
HC rejects food panel’s claims of fool-proof pesticide checks
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday rejected the claims of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) that there is a well-established system to monitor presence of pesticides in fruits, vegetables and other food items in the country. The court noted that on many occasions impermissible pesticides have been found in vegetables sold in Delhi and NCR.
A bench of Justices S K Kaul and Rajiv Shakdher also dubbed the “tall claims” of the FSSAI as “surprising” after perusing their affidavit, which informed the court that there were 68 state pesticide testing laboratories, besides regional and the referral central insecticides laboratory for monitoring food products in the country.
“We find these pleadings surprising because the material brought on record shows a picture which is far from what is painted in the affidavit. Impermissible pesticides have been found in the vegetables in the National Capital Territory (NCT),” said the bench.
The court was adjudicating the matter after taking suo motu notice of reports, stating impermissible pesticides were found in vegetables and fruits, especially in those sold in Delhi.
On the question of the presence of Endosulfan in food items, despite the pesticide being banned, the FSSAI submitted in court that though the ban was in place, the pesticide content already mixed with groundwater and soil could contaminate fruits and vegetables for many more years.
Another affidavit by the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, highlighted that it was necessary to check the presence of pesticides before fruits and vegetables reached the market. Keeping a tab on the farmers would help check this, the report said.
The bench said: “The burden is sought to be passed on by observing that the usage of pesticides is required to be tackled at the farmer-level.”
“We must note that in pursuance to our last order, we have called for a Joint Report only to ensure that there is a coordinated approach rather than different departments having their say. We find absence of such a report,” said the court while holding that there must be a comprehensive policy to check the presence of pesticides in food items.
“We, therefore, direct that authorities concerned hold a joint meeting to draft a policy, to be placed before us,” said the bench.
A bench of Justices S K Kaul and Rajiv Shakdher also dubbed the “tall claims” of the FSSAI as “surprising” after perusing their affidavit, which informed the court that there were 68 state pesticide testing laboratories, besides regional and the referral central insecticides laboratory for monitoring food products in the country.
“We find these pleadings surprising because the material brought on record shows a picture which is far from what is painted in the affidavit. Impermissible pesticides have been found in the vegetables in the National Capital Territory (NCT),” said the bench.
The court was adjudicating the matter after taking suo motu notice of reports, stating impermissible pesticides were found in vegetables and fruits, especially in those sold in Delhi.
On the question of the presence of Endosulfan in food items, despite the pesticide being banned, the FSSAI submitted in court that though the ban was in place, the pesticide content already mixed with groundwater and soil could contaminate fruits and vegetables for many more years.
Another affidavit by the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, highlighted that it was necessary to check the presence of pesticides before fruits and vegetables reached the market. Keeping a tab on the farmers would help check this, the report said.
The bench said: “The burden is sought to be passed on by observing that the usage of pesticides is required to be tackled at the farmer-level.”
“We must note that in pursuance to our last order, we have called for a Joint Report only to ensure that there is a coordinated approach rather than different departments having their say. We find absence of such a report,” said the court while holding that there must be a comprehensive policy to check the presence of pesticides in food items.
“We, therefore, direct that authorities concerned hold a joint meeting to draft a policy, to be placed before us,” said the bench.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)